The Impact of Social Exclusion in Residential Segregation: A gipsy Neighbourhood Fevzi Pasa in Turkey

Abstract

In this article, residential segregation of a gypsy group is analyzed as ethnicity-based and in relation to social segregation (through the Canakkale - Fevzi Pasa Gypsy Neighborhood). The aim of this analysis is to define the conditions under which and areas in which this type of segregation provides (dis)advantages. As a result, residential segregation can be explained through three basic reasons as external factors and obligations, internal factors and willingness, and the circular interaction between these two factors. When these factors and their interrelations are evaluated, with specific attention paid to the location and the ethnic group and in a fashion respecting multiculturalism and differences possibilities of reaching urban unification or the undivided city can be achieved.

 

Key Words: Residential Segregation, Social Exclusion, Urban Space, Gipsy Neighbourhood.

 

Keywords

• -

References

1. Özüekren, Ş., Van Kempen, R., “Housing Careers of Explanations and Prospects”, Housing Studies, 17(3): 365-379 (2002). Experiences, Urban Affairs, 27(3): 331-348 (2005).
2. Bolt, G., Hooimeijer, P., Van Kempen, R., “Ethnic
3. Segragation in The Netherlands: New Patterns, New Policies?”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Social Geography, 93(2): 214-220 (2002).
4. Rex, J., “Ethnic Minorities in the Modern Nation State: Working Papers”, the Mc Millan Company, London, 3-11 (1996).
5. Ratcliffe, P., “Housing Inequality and ‘Race’: Some Critical Reflections on the Concept of ‘Social Exclusion”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(1):1-22 (1999).
6. Özüekren, A.Ş., Van Kempen, R., “Explaining Housing Positions, Turks in European Cities: Housing and Urban Segregation”, European Research Center on Migration and Ethnic Relations, Utrecht, 12- 29 (1997). Housing Market
7. Wilder, M., “Race, Ethnicity and Class: Facing the Limits of
8. Community-based Development”,

9. Danish Building and Urban Research/EURA
10. Conference (presented paper) Copenhagen,
11. http://www.sbi.dk/eura/workshops/papers/worksho
12. p4/wilder.htm (2001).
13. Bolt, G., Van Ham, M., Van Kepmen, R.,
14. “Immigrants on the Housing Market: Spatial Segregation and Relocation Dynamics”, ENHR International Slovenia, ljubljana.uirs.si/publish/W10_Bolt.pdf (2006). http://enhr2006
15. Ratcliffe, P.R., “Housing and Social Exclusion”, Housing Studies, 13(6): 807-818 (1998).
16. Kearns, A., Forrest, R., “Social Cohesion and Multilevel Urban Governance, Urban Studies, 37(5-6): 995-1017 (2000).
17. Kogan, I., “Last Hired, First Fired? The Unemployment Dynamics of Male Immigrants in Germany”, European Sociological Review, 20(5): 445-461 (2004).
18. Foggo, H., “Romanlar Hala Şüpheli Şahıs”, Uluslararası Roman Sempozyumu, Edirne, http://www.cingene.org/semp05/tr/hacer.pdf (2005).
19. Webber, R., “The Relative Power of Type of Neighbourhood Vis a Vis Person and Household Level Demographic Variables as Discriminators of Consumer Behaviour”, ESRC Economic and Social Glasgow http://www.neighbourhoodcentre.org.uk/contact.ht ml (2004). CNR- paper:22 Bristol,
20. Internet: The European Roma Rights Centre ERRC,http://www.errc.org/cikk.php?cikk=2254&a rchiv=1 (2008).
21. Kolukırık, S., “Dünden Bugüne Çingeneler”, Ozan Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 33-45 (2009).
22. Yin, R.K., “Case Study Research: Design and Methods”, Sage Publication, London, 6-9 (1998).
23. Asseo, H., “Çingeneler-Bir Avrupa Yazgısı”, YKY Genel Kültür Dizisi, İstanbul, 9-21 (2004). [18] Alpman, N., “Trakya Romanları Sınırda Yaşayanlar”, Bilişim Yayınları, İstanbul, 5-18 (2004).
24. Martinez, N., “Romanlar”, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, 3-6 (1994).
25. Fraser, A., “Avrupa Halkları Çingeneler”, Homer Yayınları, İstanbul, 5-11 (2005).
26. Andrews, P.A., “Türkiye’de Etnik Gruplar”, Ant Yayınları, İstanbul, 18-26 (1992).
27. Söylemez, H., Özden, T., “Abe bi Kimlik Veresin”, Aksiyon, İstanbul, 546: 21-26 (2005).
28. Kolukırık, S.,”Türk Toplumunda Çingene İmgesi ve Önyargısı”, Journal of Sociological Research, 2(8): 52-71 (2005).
29. Berger, H., “Roman Mitolojisi”, Ayraç Yayınları, İstanbul, 16-24 (2000).
30. Internet: Çanakkale Municipality, http://www.burasicanakkale.com (2009).
31. Internet: Journal of National Geographic, http://www.nationalgeographic.com.tr (2009).
32. Gültekin, N., Güzey, Ö., Kırsaçlıoğlu, O., Aksoy, E., Ataç, E., “Urban Transformation, Partnerships And User Participation: Çanakkale Roman District”,48th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Liverpool, Paper Number: 61 /Entry: 1054 (2008).
33. T.C. Başbakanlık Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, “2005 Gelir Dağılımı Sonuçları”, TÜİK, Haber Bülteni, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri (2006). Ankara,
34. Marushiakova, E., Popov, V., “Gypsies in the Ottoman Empire”, University of Hertfordshire Press, Hatfield, 96-98 (2001).
35. Gellner, E., “Return of Native”, Political Quarterly, 67(1): 4-13 (1996).
36. Yoshino, K., “Globalisation and Ethno-Cultural Differences”, Ethnicity, Eds: Hutchinson, J., Smith, A.D., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 24- 27 (1990).