A Comparative Investigation of Spatial Organization and Industrial Location Interaction in Context of the Automotive Industry

Abstract

Otomotive industry has an important role as one of the locomotive sectors of the economy in the world due to the leadership of technological development. Today, as a strategic industry, it draw attention from all countries, rapidly globalization and competition is hardly exist. In recent years, Turkey has been an important peripherial region for European otomotive geography as a result of desantralization policies and development strategies towards new regions of European otomobile industry since second part of the twentieth century. Strength points of otomotive industry in Turkey in terms of competition are low labour cost, powerful capital structure, joint venture, strong first tier suppliers, proximity to developed European markets and developing regional markets. In this study, first, an introductry brief about the subject was given, following the literature review on the technological development and industrial space interactions specifically automotive industry. Then, case studies were example of otomotive industry regions regarded as successful within the European otomotive geography were presented and Kocaeli otomotive industry region is investigated comparatively. Finally, general conclusions are drawn.

 

Keywords: Spatial Organization , Industrial Location, Otomotive Industry

 

Keywords

• Spatial Organization , Industrial Location, Otomotive Industry

References

1. Tekeli, İ., Şenyapılı, T., Güvenç, M., “Ankara’da Sanayi Üretiminin Tarihsel Gelişim Süreci”, Milli Prodüktüvite Merkezi Yayınları, Ankara, 31-36 (1991).
2. Nuur, C., “Cluster dynamics and industrial policy in peripheral regions”, PhD, Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, İsveç, 27-36 (2005).
3. Meardon, S., “Modeling agglomeration and dispersion in city and country: Gunnar Myrdal, Francois geography”, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 60: 25-57 (2001). the new economic
4. Copus, A. K., “From core-periphery to polycentric development: concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality”, European Planning Studies, 9(4): 539-552 (2001).
5. Fujita, M., Thisse, J.F., “The Formation of Economic Agglomerations: Old Problems and New Perspectives”, in Huriot, J.M., Thisse, J.F.(eds.), “Economics of Cities”, Cambridge University Press, 3-73. (2000).
6. Raines, P., “The cluster approach and the dynamics of regional policy making”, The European Policy Research Centre, Regional and Industrial Policy Research Paper No:47, Glasgow, 11-13 (2001).
7. Porter, M.E., “The Competitive Advantage of Nations”, The Macmillan Press Ltd., London and Basingstoke, 148-152 (1990).
8. Morrosini, P., “Industrial clusters, knowledge integration and performance”, World Development, 32(2): 305-326 (2004).

9. DPT, “Türkiye’de Otomotiv Sanayii Gelişme Perspektifi”, Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı, Yayın No: 2660, Ankara, 2-13 (2002).
10. Fasenfest, D., Jacobs, J., “An anatomy of change and transition: the automobile industry of southeast Michigan”, Small Bussiness Economics, 21: 153- 172 (2003).
11. Hudson, R., “New production concepts, new production geographies? Reflections on changes in the automobile industry”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 19(3): 331-345 (1994).
12. Lecler, Y., “The cluster role in the development of Thei car industry”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(4): 799-814 (2002).
13. Lung, Y., “The Changing Geography of the European Automobile System”, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales, report no.2003-10, Bordeaux/Toulouse, France, 12-23 (2003).
14. Lung, Y., “The Challenges of the European Automotive Industry at the Beginning of the 21st Century”, Auto Industry Symposium: The 2003 RIETI - HOSEI - MIT IMVP Meeting, Hosei University, Japan, (2003).
15. DPT, “9. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, Bölgesel Gelişmede Temel Araçlar ve Koordinasyon Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu”, Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı, Ankara, 35-38 (2006).
16. Agiplan., “Cluster Building and Networking: Analysis of Transnational Technology Networking between Existing Clusters of SMEs and one or more Technology Directorate General Enterprise Report (1998). http://circa.europa.eu/irc/sme/euroinformation/info/d ata/sme/en/library/agiplan.doc (2008) Commission
17. Internet: ACSTYRIA website, http://www.acstyria.com/english/default.htm (2008).
18. Internet: EC, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/automotive/pagesback ground/competitiveness/cars21_hearing/acicae.pdf (2008)
19. Şenlier, N. ve Salihoğlu, T., “Endüstri Kümelerinde Değişim: Otomotiv Endüstrisi”, Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Rapor no: 2008-A-22, Kocaeli, 172-182 (2009).
20. DPT, “İllerde Öne Çıkan Sanayi Sektörleri Araştırması”, Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı, Ankara, 330-336 (2006).
21. TAYSAD, “29. Olağan Genel Kurul Faaliyet Raporu”, TAYSAD, Kocaeli, 21-43 (2007).