Comparison of Classical PD and Fuzzy PD Controller Performances of an Aircraft Pitch Angle Control System
Abstract
Aircraft dynamics are in general nonlinear, time varying, and uncertain. A control system (classical control systems) designed for a flight condition, may not provide the desired stability and performance characteristics in case of deviation from the equilibrium point. There are numerous studies regarding flight control in the literature. One of them is fuzzy flight control system Fuzzy Logic Controllers (FLCs) from their inception have demonstrated a vast range of applicability to processes where the plant transfer function is not defined but the control action can be described in terms of linguistic variables. FLCs are also being used with improved performance instead of “classical" controllers where the plant transfer function is known. Most of the applications about the design of fuzzy flight control are in simulation level. In this study, the design of classical and fuzzy PD controller for the pitch angle control system is analyzed and the results are compared for a very large, four-engine passenger jet aircraft.
Key Words: Aircraft, Classical PD controller, Flight control,
Fuzzy PD controller.
Keywords
References
- [1] Kahvecioglu, A., ”Flight control system design using multi-model approach and genetic algorithm”, Phd. Thesis, University of Anadolu, Eskisehir, (2000).
- [2] Savran, A., Tasaltin, R., Becerikli, Y., “Intelligent adaptive nonlinear flight control for a high performance aircraft with neural networks”, ISA Transactions, 45(2): 225–247 (2006).
- [3] Verbruggen, H.B., Zimmerman, H.J., Babuska, R. , “Fuzzy Algorithms for Control”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts, U.S.A, (1999).
- [4] Robust Flight Control, A Design Challenge, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Springer Berlin-Heidelberg, (224/1997).
- [5] Aström, K.J., Wittenmark, B., “Adaptive control”, Addison Wesley, Lund Institute of Technology, U.S.A, (1989).
- [6] Experience with the X-15 adaptive flight control system, http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/87785mai n_H-618.pdf
- [7] Enns, D.F., “Robustness of dynamic inversion vs. Mu synthesis: Lateral-directional flight control example”, Proceedings of the AIAA Conference on Guidance, Navigation, and Control, Portland, Oregon, (1990).
- [8] Hayes, J.R., Bates, D.G., “LFT-based uncertainty modeling and mu-analysis of the HIRM+RIDE flight control law”, Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control Systems Design (CACSD’02), Glasgow, 242–247, (2002).
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
December 16, 2011
Submission Date
November 4, 2010
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2011 Volume: 24 Number: 4