Planners’ Attitudes toward the Spatial Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies

Abstract

Information and communication technologies have evidenced a swift development recently, and the effects of these technologies on space have been discussed since the 1980s. Even though there is no consensus about what spatial effects are, all authorities and academics are of the opinion that information technologies play an important role in changing spatial structures. These developments will affect both spatial development and spatial planning. This article aims to offer an insight into the impacts of information technologies on urban

spatial structure and development. Within this context, in order to discuss the spatial effects of information technologies, the basic factor on which spatial change is based should be defined. Studies of the changing meanings of space, distance and time have shown that these factors will not be a negative factor in relation to information networks and communication. Information and the need for qualified people are important elements in production, and become determinants in the location decisions for activities. The expected spatial changes are various. In general, future studies will be needed to focus on the spatial effects of information technologies. The article discusses the effects of ICTs on spatial and urban change and to examine the needs that arise and opportunities to be met in terms of the city and regional planning discipline. With that purpose in mind, the aim is to make suggestions in the light of opinions discussed in the relevant literature and to realize a field study in order to evaluate the opinions of urban and regional planners who are deciding the future of cities. The results of the field survey indicate that urban and regional planners are of the similar opinion as experts and academics in the field in supporting that ICTs are an important element that should be considered in spatial planning.

Keywords: information and communication technologies, urban development, spatial change, planning, urban

and regional planners

Keywords

• information and communication technologies, urban development, spatial change, planning, urban and regional planners

H. Filiz ALKAN MEŞHUR1,♠

Abstract

References

1. Graham, S., “Telecommunications and the Future of Cities: Debunking the Myths”, Cities, 14, 1, 21–29, (1997).
2. Castells, M., “The Internet Galaxy, Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society”, Oxford: University Press, (2001).
3. Graham, S. and Marvin, S., “Splintering Urbanism”, London, Routledge, (2001).
4. Geyik, M. and Coskun, R., “The Importance of Knowledge in Competition between Cities”, III. National Knowledge, Economy and Management Congress, Administrative Sciences, Eskisehir, (2004). University Faculty of
5. Bell, D., “The Coming of Post-Industrial Society”, London: Heinemann, (1974).
6. Masuda, Y., “The Information Society as Post- industrial Society”, USA: World Future Society, (1981).
7. Castells, M., “The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture”, Vol. 1, The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford: Blackwell, (1996).
8. Toffler, A., “The Third Wave”, USA: Collins, (1980).

9. Naisbitt, J., “Megatrends”, New York: Warner Books, (1984).
10. Weiner, E. and Brown, A., “Insider’s Guide to the Future”, USA: Boardroom, (1997).
11. Talvitie, J., “The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Urban and Regional Planning”, Department of Surveying Institute of Real Estate Studies, Helsinki, (2003a). of Technology
12. Harris, B. and Batty, M., “Locational Models, Geographic Systems”, NCGIA (National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis), (1992). Planning Support
13. Klosterman, R., “Planning in the Information Age”, The Practice of Local Government Planning (2000).
14. Velibeyoglu, K., “Institutional Use of Information Technologies in City Planning Agencies: Implications from Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department: City and Regional Planning, Major: City Planning, Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir, Turkey, (2004). A Molitor,
15. Communications, The Futurist, September- October, 5 2001, 32-37. USA: World Future Society, (2001). Talvitie,
16. Communication on Land Use Planning” FIG Working Week 2003, Paris, France, (2003b). http://www.fig.net/pub/fig_2003/TS_10/TS10_4_Talvit ie.pdf (Accessed January, 2013). of Mobile Sachs-Jeantet, C.,
17. Transformations in Cities: A Challenge to Social Sciences”, MOST Phase I UNESCO site, Discussion Paper No.2, 7 (2003). “Managing Social Towns and Cities,
18. Ercoskun, O.Y., “Ecological-Technological (Eco- Tech) Design for a Sustainable City: A Case Study on Güdül, Ankara, Ph.D. Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Science and Technology, Ankara, (2007).
19. Odendaal, N., “Information and Communication Technology and local governance: understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies”, Computers, Environment Urban Systems, (27) 6:585-607 (2003).
20. Ercoskun O.Y. and Karaaslan S., “Ecological and Technological Cities of the Future”, Megaron, YTÜ Arch. Fac. E-Journal, Volume 4, Issue 1, p.54-67, (2009).
21. Ercoskun, O.Y. “Comparison between Turkish & Scandinavian Housing and Key Strategies for Eco-tech Design”, ITU A /Z, Vol.5, No.1, 74–96, (2008).
22. Yigitcanlar, T. and Velibeyoglu, K., “Knowledge- Based Urban Development: The Local Economic Development Path of Brisbane, Australia”, Local Economy 23(3), pp.195-207, (2008).
23. Castells, M., “The Informational City: Information Technology Economic Restructuring and the Urban Regional Process”, Oxford: Blackwell, (1989).
24. Castells, M., Space of Flows, Space of Places: Materials for a Theory of Urbanism in the Information Age, in: S.Graham ed. “The Cybercities Reader”, New York: Routledge, (2004).
25. Gaspar, J. and Glaeser, E.L., “Information Technology and the Future of Cities”, Journal of Urban Economics, 43, 136–156, (1998).
26. Panayides, A. and Kern, C.R., “Information Technology and the Future of Cities: An Alternative Analysis”, Urban Studies, 42(1), 163–167, (2005).
27. Maeng D.M. and Nedovic-Budic, Z., “Urban Form and Planning in the Information Age: Lessons from Literature”, Spatium, Vol. 17–18, 1–12, (2008).
28. Hall, P., “Towards a General Urban Theory”, in J. Brotchic et al. ed., Cities in Competition: Productive and Sustainable Cities for the 21st Century, Sydney: Longman, Australia, 3–32, (1995).
29. Hall, P., “The Future of Cities”, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23, 173–185, (1999).
30. GU J Sci, 26(3):473-487 (2013)/ H. Filiz ALKAN MEŞHUR
31. Kotkin, J., “The New Geography, How the Digital Revolution is Reshaping the American Landscape”, New York: Random House, (2000).
32. Kotkin J. and Devol, R.C., “Knowledge-Value Cities in the Digital Age”, Santa Monica, CA: Milken Institute, (2001).
33. Garreau, J.,” Edge City: Life on the New Frontier”, New York, Doubleday, (1991).
34. Sassen, S., “Global Cities and Global City Regions: A Comparison”, in: A. J. Scott ed. Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2001).
35. Cohen, H., “Invisible Cities”, The Industrial Standard, 180–184, (2000).
36. Webber, M., “Order in Diversity: Community without Propinquity” in Cities and Space: The Future of Urban Land, ed., Lowdon Wingo, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, (1963).
37. Webber, M., “The Urban Place and the Nonplace Urban Realm”, in: J. M. Dyckman, D. L. Foley, A. Z. Guttenberg, W.L.C. Wheaton, and C. B. Wurster ed., Explorations into Urban Structure, Philadelphia, (1964).
38. Pascal, A., “The Vanishing City”, Urban Studies, 24, 597–603, (1987).
39. Atkinson, R., “The Rise of the Information Age Metropolis”, Futurist, 41–46, (1996).
40. Gillespie, A., “Digital Lifestyles and the Future City”, in: N. Leach (Ed.) Designing for a Digital World, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, (2002).
41. Moss, M.L., “Technology and Cities”, Cityscape, 3:3, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, (1998).
42. Gordon, P. and Richardson, H.W., “Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal?”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, 1, 95–106, (1997).
43. Tayyaran, M.R. and Khan, A.M. “The Effects of Telecommuting and Intelligent Transportation Systems on Technology, 10(2), pp. 87-100, (2003). Journal of Urban Gottmann, J. and Megalopolis: The Urban Writing of Jean Gottmann”,
44. Baltimore, The John Hopkins University Press, (1990). Harper, R.A. “Since
45. Hawley, A.H., “Human Ecology: A Theoretical Essay”, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (1986).
46. Graham, S. and Marvin, S., “Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places”, London, Routledge, (1996).
47. Atkinson, R., “Technological Change, Service Employment and the Future of Cities”, Mimeo, Washington: Office Technology Assessment, (2001).
48. Fathy, T.A., “Telecity: Information Technology and its Impact on City Form”, New York: Praeger, (1991).
49. Mitchell, W.J., “E-topia: Urban Life, Jim-But Not as We Know It” Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 32, (1999).
50. Horan, T.A., “Digital Places: Building Our City of Bits”, Washington D.C.: Urban Land Institute, (2000).
51. Kasarda, J.D., “New Logistics Technologies and Infrastructure for the Digital Economy”, Chapel Hill: Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise, University of North Carolina, (2000).
52. Castells, M., Grass Rooting the Space of Flows, in: J. O. Wheeler and Y. Aoyama, ed. “Cities in the Telecommunications Geographies”, New York: Routledge, (2000). The Fracturing of
53. Mitchell, W.J., “City of Bits: Space, Place and the Infobahn”, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, (1995).
54. Segal, Howard P., “Technological Utopianism in American Culture”, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, (1985).
55. Winner, L., “The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology”, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, (1986).
56. Pitkin, B., “A Historical Perspective of Technology and Planning”, Berkeley Planning Journal 15, 32-55, (2001).
57. Fishman, R., “Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Le Corbusier”, New York, Basic Books, (1977).
58. TMMOB, The Chamber of City Planners, http://www.spo.org.tr (Accessed March, 2010).
59. Kopomaa, T., “The City in your Pocket: Birth of the Mobile Information Society”, Helsinki, Gaudeamus, (2000).