The Effects of Anchor Configurations and Field Characteristics on Anchored Diaphragm Walls

Year 2020, Volume: 33 Issue: 4, 719 - 733, 01.12.2020

Anu James , Babu Kurıan

https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.557776

Abstract

Diaphragm walls are the ideal solution for productive utilisation of underground space to meet modern-day demands of infrastructural developments. Selection of appropriate wall and support configurations has substantial impact on economy, time and performance of diaphragm wall projects. Unsatisfactory implementation of such retaining systems during or after construction may cause heavy causalities such as loss of life and damage to adjacent infrastructures. Practical significance of excavation induced deformations is large due to its potential damage to adjacent structures. Hence, reliable estimates of excavation related responses are vital for construction and implementation of embedded diaphragm walls. This paper presents results of parametric analysis performed on anchored diaphragm walls evaluating the effects of anchor configurations and field characteristics. Numerical studies are carried out to comprehend the influence of factors like ground conditions, excavation geometry and anchor characteristics. Walls embedded in cohesive and non-cohesive soils with varying ground water locations are considered for analysis. Anchor features including length, inclination and axial prestress are varied in combination with the above parameters. The effects of these factors and their combined influence on the deformation, flexural strength and axial capacity of diaphragm walls are determined and evaluated. Numerical analyses are carried out using finite element simulations with Plaxis 2d. Comparative charts are drawn to demonstrate the variations of wall responses with different combinations of influencing factors. Optimal configurations of diaphragm wall and anchor system for different ground conditions can be perceived from the result charts.

Keywords

Diaphragm wall, Parametric analysis, Anchor configuration, Anchor prestress, Design guidelines

References

• Boscardin, M. D., and Cording, E. J., “Building response to excavation induced settlement”, J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 115(1): 1–21, (1989).
• Clough, G., and Tsui, Y., “Performance of Tied-Back Walls in Clay”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division , 10 (12):1259-1273, (1989).
• Goh, A.,” Assessment of basal stability for braced excavation system using finite element method”, Comput Geotech, 10 (4): 325-338, (1990).
• Garvin, R., and Boward, J., “Using slurry walls to protect a historic building: a case study. Slurry walls: Design, Construction, and Quality Control”, ASTM Special Topic Publication, 1129: 117-127, (1992).
• Winter, E., Skep, N., and Tallard, G., “ Slurry wall performance Adjacent to Historic Church. Slurry wall: Design, Construction, and Quality Control”, ASTM STP, 1129: 164-171, (1992).
• Ou, C., Hsieh, P., and Chion, D., “Characteristics of ground surface settlement during excavation”, CAN GEOTECH J, 30 (5): 758-767, (1993).
• Wong, I., Poh, T., and Chuah, H., “Analysis of case histories from construction of the Central Expressway in Singapore”, CAN GEOTECH J, 33 (5): 732-746, (1996).
• Yajnheswaran, B., Ranjan, H. S., and Rao, S., "Analysis of the effect of anchor rod on the behavior of diaphragm wall using plaxis 3d" ,Aquatic Procedia 4: 240-247, (2015)
• Yajnheswaran, B., Akshay, P. R., Rajasekaran, C. and Rao, S., “Effect of stiffness on performance of diaphragm wall”, Procedia Engineering, 116: 343-349,(2015).
• Bose, S. K. and Som, N. N., “Parametric study of a braced cut by finite element method”, Comput Geotech, 22(2): 91-107,(1998).
• Zhang, W., Goh, A. T. C. and Xuan, F., “A simple prediction model for wall deflection caused by braced excavation in clays”, Comput Geotech, 63: 67-72, (2015).
• Hashash, Y. M. A. and Whittle, A. J., “Ground movement prediction for deep excavations in soft clay”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122(6): 474-486, (1996).
• Conti, R. and Viggiani, G. M. B., “A new limit equilibrium method for the pseudostatic design of embedded cantilevered retaining walls”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 50: 143-150, (2013).
• Goh, A. T. C., Zhang, F., Zhang, W. and Chew, O. Y. S., “Assessment of strut forces for braced excavation in clays from numerical analysis and field measurements”, Comput Geotech, 86: 141-149, (2017).
• Chowdhury, S. S., Deb, K. and Sengupta, A., “Estimation of Design Parameters for Braced Excavation: Numerical Study”, International Journal of Geomechanics, 13(3): 234-247, (2013).
• Chowdhury, S. S., Deb, K. and Sengupta, A., “Estimation of Design Parameters for Braced Excavation in clays”, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 35(2): 857-870, (2017).
• Hsiung, B. C. B., Yang, K. H., Aila, W. and Hung, C., “Three-dimensional effects of a deep excavation on wall deflections in loose to medium dense sands”, Comput Geotech, 80: 138-151, (2016).
• Abdallah, M., “Numerical modeling of various support systems to stabilize deep excavations”, International Journal of Geological and Environmental Engineering, 11(7): 609-614, (2017).
• Lewandowska, A. S. and Czajewska, M. M., “Design of diaphragm walls according to EN 1997-1:2004 Eurocode 7”, Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 291-296, (2007).