Research Article

A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey

Volume: 8 Number: 1 March 31, 2020
EN

A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey

Abstract

Knowledge is one of the most significant resources of our era. Usage and management of it provides formation and development for organizational memory. The knowledge that contains as tacit form in firms, gains the characteristics of easily transferable and even documentable by turning into explicit form.

Knowledge management is now a core practice for gaining an advantage in competitive market conditions used by organizations. That practice can be used for collecting, transferring, safely keeping and managing knowledge. Managing knowledge has importance within the architecture industry where project knowledge needs to be used and delivered effectively. That’s because the architectural design is knowledge-centric planning based on why and how to do a job, how to reach the perfect solution. Moreover, it provides lots of information and knowledge for other disciplines.

The implementation of knowledge management has various degrees in every organization. Knowledge management maturity is recognized as determining the level of companies at managing knowledge. This study aims to review literature for works about these terms and propose a scaling system for knowledge management maturity levels for architecture companies of Turkey in the consideration of information received. Knowledge management maturity models are scaled at 4 to 6 levels in various reviewed works. Based on these exercises it is proposed that from 0 to 5 there are 6 levels of knowledge management maturity levels for architecture companies of Turkey depending on usage of knowledge management applications. 

Keywords

References

  1. Egbu, C.O. and H.S. Robinson, "Construction as a knowledge-based industry". Knowledge management in construction. 4: 31-49. (2005)
  2. Carneiro, A., "How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness?". Journal of knowledge management. 4(2): 87-98. (2000)
  3. Sheehan, T., et al., "Strategies and business case for knowledge management". Knowledge management in construction. 50-64. (2005)
  4. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press. (1995)
  5. Udeaja, C.E., et al., "A web-based prototype for live capture and reuse of construction project knowledge". Automation in Construction. 17(7): 839-851. (2008)
  6. Roberts, J., "From know-how to show-how? Questioning the role of information and communication technologies in knowledge transfer". Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 12(4): 429-443. (2000)
  7. Davenport, T.H. and L. Prusak, Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press. (1998)
  8. Boahene, M. and G. Ditsa, Conceptual confusions in knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Clarifications for better KMS development, in Knowledge management: Current issues and challenges. IGI Global. 12-24. (2003)

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Architecture

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 31, 2020

Submission Date

November 7, 2019

Acceptance Date

April 11, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 8 Number: 1

APA
Bayraktarlı, Ö. F., & Topraklı, A. Y. (2020). A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 8(1). https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN
AMA
1.Bayraktarlı ÖF, Topraklı AY. A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey. GUJSPB. 2020;8(1). https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN
Chicago
Bayraktarlı, Ömer Faruk, and Abdurrahman Yağmur Topraklı. 2020. “A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning 8 (1). https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN.
EndNote
Bayraktarlı ÖF, Topraklı AY (March 1, 2020) A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning 8 1
IEEE
[1]Ö. F. Bayraktarlı and A. Y. Topraklı, “A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey”, GUJSPB, vol. 8, no. 1, Mar. 2020, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN
ISNAD
Bayraktarlı, Ömer Faruk - Topraklı, Abdurrahman Yağmur. “A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning 8/1 (March 1, 2020). https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN.
JAMA
1.Bayraktarlı ÖF, Topraklı AY. A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey. GUJSPB. 2020;8. Available at https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN.
MLA
Bayraktarlı, Ömer Faruk, and Abdurrahman Yağmur Topraklı. “A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, vol. 8, no. 1, Mar. 2020, https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN.
Vancouver
1.Ömer Faruk Bayraktarlı, Abdurrahman Yağmur Topraklı. A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey. GUJSPB [Internet]. 2020 Mar. 1;8(1). Available from: https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN