A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey
Abstract
Knowledge is one of the most significant resources of our era. Usage and management of it provides formation and development for organizational memory. The knowledge that contains as tacit form in firms, gains the characteristics of easily transferable and even documentable by turning into explicit form.
Knowledge management is now a core practice for gaining an advantage in competitive market conditions used by organizations. That practice can be used for collecting, transferring, safely keeping and managing knowledge. Managing knowledge has importance within the architecture industry where project knowledge needs to be used and delivered effectively. That’s because the architectural design is knowledge-centric planning based on why and how to do a job, how to reach the perfect solution. Moreover, it provides lots of information and knowledge for other disciplines.
The implementation of knowledge management has various
degrees in every organization. Knowledge management maturity is recognized as
determining the level of companies at managing knowledge. This study aims to
review literature for works about these terms and propose a scaling system for
knowledge management maturity levels for architecture companies of Turkey in
the consideration of information received. Knowledge management maturity models
are scaled at 4 to 6 levels in various reviewed works. Based on these exercises
it is proposed that from 0 to 5 there are 6 levels of knowledge management
maturity levels for architecture companies of Turkey depending on usage of
knowledge management applications.
Keywords
References
- Egbu, C.O. and H.S. Robinson, "Construction as a knowledge-based industry". Knowledge management in construction. 4: 31-49. (2005)
- Carneiro, A., "How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness?". Journal of knowledge management. 4(2): 87-98. (2000)
- Sheehan, T., et al., "Strategies and business case for knowledge management". Knowledge management in construction. 50-64. (2005)
- Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press. (1995)
- Udeaja, C.E., et al., "A web-based prototype for live capture and reuse of construction project knowledge". Automation in Construction. 17(7): 839-851. (2008)
- Roberts, J., "From know-how to show-how? Questioning the role of information and communication technologies in knowledge transfer". Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 12(4): 429-443. (2000)
- Davenport, T.H. and L. Prusak, Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press. (1998)
- Boahene, M. and G. Ditsa, Conceptual confusions in knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Clarifications for better KMS development, in Knowledge management: Current issues and challenges. IGI Global. 12-24. (2003)
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Architecture
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
March 31, 2020
Submission Date
November 7, 2019
Acceptance Date
April 11, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2020 Volume: 8 Number: 1