Araştırma Makalesi

A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey

Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 31 Mart 2020
PDF İndir
EN

A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey

Öz

Knowledge is one of the most significant resources of our era. Usage and management of it provides formation and development for organizational memory. The knowledge that contains as tacit form in firms, gains the characteristics of easily transferable and even documentable by turning into explicit form.

Knowledge management is now a core practice for gaining an advantage in competitive market conditions used by organizations. That practice can be used for collecting, transferring, safely keeping and managing knowledge. Managing knowledge has importance within the architecture industry where project knowledge needs to be used and delivered effectively. That’s because the architectural design is knowledge-centric planning based on why and how to do a job, how to reach the perfect solution. Moreover, it provides lots of information and knowledge for other disciplines.

The implementation of knowledge management has various degrees in every organization. Knowledge management maturity is recognized as determining the level of companies at managing knowledge. This study aims to review literature for works about these terms and propose a scaling system for knowledge management maturity levels for architecture companies of Turkey in the consideration of information received. Knowledge management maturity models are scaled at 4 to 6 levels in various reviewed works. Based on these exercises it is proposed that from 0 to 5 there are 6 levels of knowledge management maturity levels for architecture companies of Turkey depending on usage of knowledge management applications. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Egbu, C.O. and H.S. Robinson, "Construction as a knowledge-based industry". Knowledge management in construction. 4: 31-49. (2005)
  2. Carneiro, A., "How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness?". Journal of knowledge management. 4(2): 87-98. (2000)
  3. Sheehan, T., et al., "Strategies and business case for knowledge management". Knowledge management in construction. 50-64. (2005)
  4. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press. (1995)
  5. Udeaja, C.E., et al., "A web-based prototype for live capture and reuse of construction project knowledge". Automation in Construction. 17(7): 839-851. (2008)
  6. Roberts, J., "From know-how to show-how? Questioning the role of information and communication technologies in knowledge transfer". Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 12(4): 429-443. (2000)
  7. Davenport, T.H. and L. Prusak, Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press. (1998)
  8. Boahene, M. and G. Ditsa, Conceptual confusions in knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Clarifications for better KMS development, in Knowledge management: Current issues and challenges. IGI Global. 12-24. (2003)

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Mimarlık

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Mart 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

7 Kasım 2019

Kabul Tarihi

11 Nisan 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Bayraktarlı, Ö. F., & Topraklı, A. Y. (2020). A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 8(1). https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN
AMA
1.Bayraktarlı ÖF, Topraklı AY. A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey. GUJSPB. 2020;8(1). https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN
Chicago
Bayraktarlı, Ömer Faruk, ve Abdurrahman Yağmur Topraklı. 2020. “A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning 8 (1). https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN.
EndNote
Bayraktarlı ÖF, Topraklı AY (01 Mart 2020) A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning 8 1
IEEE
[1]Ö. F. Bayraktarlı ve A. Y. Topraklı, “A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey”, GUJSPB, c. 8, sy 1, Mar. 2020, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN
ISNAD
Bayraktarlı, Ömer Faruk - Topraklı, Abdurrahman Yağmur. “A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning 8/1 (01 Mart 2020). https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN.
JAMA
1.Bayraktarlı ÖF, Topraklı AY. A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey. GUJSPB. 2020;8. Available at https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN.
MLA
Bayraktarlı, Ömer Faruk, ve Abdurrahman Yağmur Topraklı. “A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, c. 8, sy 1, Mart 2020, https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN.
Vancouver
1.Ömer Faruk Bayraktarlı, Abdurrahman Yağmur Topraklı. A Literature Review for Knowledge Management Maturity Scale for Architecture Firms of Turkey. GUJSPB [Internet]. 01 Mart 2020;8(1). Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA83AF66MN