Evaluation of Courthouse Buildings within the Scope of Quality Function Deployment: Gaziantep Annex Courthouse Case

Year 2019, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 443 - 457, 30.09.2019

Abdurrahman Yağmur Topraklı

Abstract

In this article, the
application of Quality Function Deployment method in courthouse buildings is
examined through the design of Gaziantep Annex Courthouse Building. The Quality
Function Deployment method is defined as a method of product or service
development, taking into account user requests, including the manufacturer and
supplier. Despite the emergence in the 1960s, the use of this method in Turkey
began in 1990, mainly limited practices in production industry are seen in the
construction industry. With the Quality Function Deployment method applied
during the design process of the Gaziantep Additional Courthouse Building,
which is still under construction, the current building users’ problems analyzed
in this building. The parking problem in the current building, the request of
the judges for a working environment free from noise, meeting and conference
rooms according to user requests are considered during design phase and the
design was advanced in this direction. When the Quality Function Deployment
method is applied from the design stage, it is seen that it improves the
quality of the building and ensures that the building has a user-friendly
design and it is recommended to be used in the design of the courthouse
buildings. The QFD is recommended to be used in the design of courthouse
buildings.

Keywords

Quality Function Deployment, Gaziantep Annex Courthouse, Courthouse Design

References

• [1] S. Bazaati, S. Bayrmi, E. Oral, Kalite Fonksiyonu Yayılımı ve İnşaat Sektöründe Bir Uygulama Quality Function Deployment and an Application in Construction Sector, Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimar. Fakültesi Derg. 29 (2014) 53–61.
• [2] N. Esin, Y. Olcay, Toplu Konut Üretiminde Kullanıcı Tatmini Yönelimli Bir Veri Toplama Modeli: Kalite Fonksiyon Yayılımı, İTÜ Derg. 9 (2010) 71–82.
• [3] F. Çebi, R. Sattarov, Kalite Fonksiyon Yayılımında Bulanık Mantık Yaklaşımı: Beyaz Eşya Sektöründe Bir Uygulama, İTÜ, 2008.
• [4] M. İnceoğlu, A. Aytuğ, Kentsel Mekanda Kalite Kavramı, Megaron. 4 (2009) 131–146.
• [5] L. Sui Pheng, L. Yeap, Quality Function Deployment in Design∕Build Projects, J. Archit. Eng. 7 (2001) 30–39. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2001)7:2(30).
• [6] P. Roberts, ed., Quality Function Deployment, in: Prod. Excell. Using Six Sigma, Warwick Manufacturing Group School of Engineering, Coventry, 2007: pp. 1–62.
• [7] K.E. Bampton, E. Aspinwall, D.J. Degrado-Hernandez, Quality Function Deployment in Construction, Constr. Manag. Econ. June (2007) 597–609.
• [8] S. Natee, S.P. Low, E.A.L. Teo, Quality Function Deployment for Buildable and Sustainable Construction, Springer, Singapore, 2016.
• [9] A. Bolar, S. Tesfamariam, R. Sadiq, Management of Civil Infrastructure Systems: QFD-Based Approach, J. Infrastruct. Syst. 20 (2014) 4013009. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000150.
• [10] N. Eldin, V. Hikle, Pilot Study of Quality Function Deployment in Construction Projects, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. - J CONSTR ENG Manag. 129 (2003). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:3(314).[11] N. Singhaputtangkul, S.P. Low, A.L. Teo, B.-G. Hwang, Knowledge-based Decision Support System Quality Function Deployment (KBDSS-QFD) tool for assessment of building envelopes, Autom. Constr. 35 (2013) 314–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.017.
• [12] E. Güllü, Y. Ulcay, Kalite Fonksiyonu Yayılımı ve Bir Uygulama, Uludağ Univ. J. Fac. Eng. 7 (2002) 71–91. doi:10.17482/uujfe.18930.
• [13] I. Dikmen, M.T. Birgönül, S. Kızıltas, Strategic Use of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in the Construction Industry, Build. Environ. 40 (2005) 245–255.
• [14] N. Esin, Y. İnceoğlu, Konut Yapım Sektöründe Toplam Kalite Yönetimi: “Kalite Fonksiyon Yayılımı” Metodolojisinin Sektöre Uyarlanması, İTÜ, 2004.
• [15] A.Y. Topraklı, A. Adem, M. Dağdeviren, A Courthouse Site Selection Method Using Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set: A Case Study for Turkey, Procedia Comput. Sci. 102 (2016) 603–610. doi:10.1016/J.PROCS.2016.09.449.
• [16] A.Y. Topraklı, ed., Mahkeme Sisteminin Güçlendirilmesi Ortak Projesi-Adliye Mimarisi Rehber İlkeleri, Council of Europe, 2013.
• [17] A.Y. Topraklı, ed., Adliye Tasarımında Güncel Yaklaşımlar Farklı Ülke Uygulamaları, Council of Europe, 2013.