Investigation of Different Superplasticizers Effect on Workability and Strength Parameters in Ultra High Performance Concretes

Abstract

The use of ultra-high performance concretes (UHPC) in the modern construction industry is increasingly widespread. UHPCs are a type of concrete that provides advantages in solving many engineering problems. UHPCs have superior properties compared to conventional concretes in terms of workability, self-settling, as well as high strength and durability. However, although UHPCs have many advantages, achieving the desired workability is one of the biggest challenges of the production procedure, since they contain high amounts of powder materials. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the most suitable superplasticizer (SP) additive in terms of workability and strength by using different SP additives in UHPC mixtures. In this study, workability and strength parameters were tested on UHPC mixtures using 8 different SP additives. First of all, the spreading diameters of the obtained mixtures were measured. For each mixture, compressive strength, density, ultrasound velocity, Schmidt hammer rebound and Leeb hardness measurements were performed on 70x140 mm sized cylindrical samples taken on days 2, 7 and 28. Since SPs have a working principle at the interfaces of particles in the internal structure of concrete, different behaviors were observed on workability, even if a little. All the results obtained have been compared with the literature and it has been proven that they meet the UHPC specifications.

Keywords

• UHPC
• superplasticizer
• compressive strength
• workability
• ultrasound velocity

References

1. [1] A. TOPBAS, F.Ö. TULEN, M. MARASLI, B. KOHEN, A Prefabricated GFRC-UHPC Shell Pedestrian Bridge, IASS Annual Symposium 2019 – Structural Membranes. (2019).
2. [2] A. TOPBAS, T. Ateser, F.O. TULEN, M. MARASLI, B. KOHEN, Physical Modeling and Design Development of Precast UHPC Shell Bridge, Proceedings of the IASS Annual Symposium 2020/21 and the 7th International Conference on Spatial Structures. (2020).
3. [3] J. Xue, B. Briseghella, F. Huang, C. Nuti, H. Tabatabai, B. Chen, Review of ultra-high performance concrete and its application in bridge engineering, Construction and Building Materials. 260 (2020) 119844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119844.
4. [4] ASTM C1856/C1856M-17, Standard Practice for Fabricating and Testing Specimens of Ultra-High Performance Concrete, American Society for Testing and Materials. (2017).
5. [5] P. Richard, M. Cheyrezy, S.D. Bouygues, S. Quentin, (Refereed) (Received January 5: in final form April 12.1995), 25 (1995) 1501–1511.
6. [6] J. Li, Z. Wu, C. Shi, Q. Yuan, Z. Zhang, Durability of ultra-high performance concrete – A review, Construction and Building Materials. 255 (2020) 119296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119296.
7. [7] M. Ghous, R. Kahraman, N. Al, B. Gencturk, Durability characteristics of high and ultra-high performance concretes, Journal of Building Engineering. 33 (2021) 101669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101669.
8. [8] N. Roux, C. Andrade, M.. Sanjuan, Experimental study of durability of reactive powder concretes, (1996) 1–6.

9. [9] H. Dehghanpour, S. Subasi, S. Guntepe, M. Emiroglu, M. Marasli, Investigation of fracture mechanics, physical and dynamic properties of UHPCs containing PVA, glass and steel fibers, Construction and Building Materials. 328 (2022) 127079. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127079.
10. [10] O.R. Abuodeh, J.A. Abdalla, R.A. Hawileh, Assessment of compressive strength of Ultra-high Performance Concrete using deep machine learning techniques, Applied Soft Computing Journal. 95 (2020) 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106552.
11. [11] M. Pourbaba, E. Asefi, H. Sadaghian, A. Mirmiran, Effect of age on the compressive strength of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete, Construction and Building Materials. 175 (2018) 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.203.
12. [12] R. Duval, E.. Kadri, Influence of silica fume on the workability and the compressive strength of high-performance concretes, 28 (1998) 533–547.
13. [13] S.J.B.J. Lataste, T. Parry, S.G. Millard, M.N. Soutsos, Assessment of fibre orientation in ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete and its effect on flexural strength, (2010) 1009–1023. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-009-9562-3.
14. [14] D. Yoo, H. Shin, Y. Yoon, Ultrasonic Monitoring of Setting and Strength Development of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete, Materials. (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9040294.
15. [15] M. Kazemi, R. Madandoust, J. de Brito, Compressive strength assessment of recycled aggregate concrete using Schmidt rebound hammer and core testing, Construction and Building Materials. 224 (2019) 630–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.110.
16. [16] D.A. Mishra, A. Basu, Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength of rock materials by index tests using regression analysis and fuzzy inference system, Engineering Geology. 160 (2013) 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.04.004.
17. [17] C. Schrö, M. Gruber, J. Plank, Cement and Concrete Research Preferential adsorption of polycarboxylate superplasticizers on cement and silica fume in ultra-high performance concrete ( UHPC ), 42 (2012) 1401–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.08.013.
18. [18] B.J. Olawuyi, W.P. Boshoff, Influence of SAP content and curing age on air void distribution of high performance concrete using 3D volume analysis, Construction and Building Materials. 135 (2017) 580–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.128.
19. [19] W.P. Boshoff, C.J. Adendorff, Effect of sustained tensile loading on SHCC crack widths, Cement and Concrete Composites. 37 (2013) 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.11.009.
20. [20] J. Kruger, G. Van Zijl, An investigation into the porosity of extrusion-based 3D printed concrete, Additive Manufacturing. 37 (2021) 101740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101740.
21. [21] R. Asiaban, H. Khajehsaeid, E. Ghobadi, M. Jabbari, New magneto-rheological fluids with high stability : Experimental study and constitutive modelling, Polymer Testing. 87 (2020) 106512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106512.
22. [22] K. Voit, T. Zimmermann, Characteristics of selected concrete with tunnel excavation material, CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING MATERIALS. 101 (2015) 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.016.
23. [23] J.D. Ríos, H. Cifuentes, C. Leiva, S. Seitl, Analysis of the mechanical and fracture behavior of heated ultra-high- performance fi ber-reinforced concrete by X-ray computed tomography, Cement and Concrete Research. 119 (2019) 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.02.015.
24. [24] I. Kalkan, I. Demir, S. Bakirci Er, O. Sevim4, Influence of Shrinkage Reducing Admixtures on the Mechanical Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete, 12th International Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering. (2016).
25. [25] T. Mutuk, S. Çevik, B.M. Oktay, High performance cement composites with nano-SiO2 and nano-Al2O3 powders, 4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Engineering and Natural Sciences. 4 (2019) 391–393.
26. [26] S.Z. Al-sarraf, M.A.Y.J. Hamoodi, M.A. Ihsan, HIGH STRENGTH SELF-COMPACTED CONCRETE MIX DESIGN, International Journal of Civil Engineering (IJCE). 2 (2013) 83–92.
27. [27] E. GURSEL, M. KAYA, THE EFFECT OF THE USE OF MINERAL ADDITIVES ON EARLY AND ADVANCED AGE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETES, Civil Engineering and Urban Planning: An International Journal(CiVEJ). 3 (2016) 13–31. https://doi.org/10.5121/civej.2016.3202.
28. [28] C 1611/C 1611M, Standard Test Method for Slump Flow of Self-Consolidating Concrete, American Society for Testing and Materials. (205AD).
29. [29] TS EN 12390-3, Hardened concrete tests - Part 3: Determination of compressive strength, Turkish Standard. (2002).
30. [30] ASTM C805, Standard test method for rebound number of hardened concrete, American Society for Testing and Materials. (1997).
31. [31] ASTM C597, Standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete, American Society for Testing and Materials. (2009).
32. [32] ASTM A956, Standard Test Method for Leeb Hardness Testing of Steel Products, American Society for Testing and Materials. (2006).
33. [33] P.P. Li, Q.L. Yu, H.J.H. Brouwers, Effect of PCE-type superplasticizer on early-age behaviour of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC), Construction and Building Materials. 153 (2017) 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.145.
34. [34] R. Di Wu, S. Bin Dai, S.W. Jian, J. Huang, Y. Lv, B.D. Li, N. Azizbek, Utilization of the circulating fluidized bed combustion ash in autoclaved aerated concrete: Effect of superplasticizer, Construction and Building Materials. 237 (2020) 117644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117644.
35. [35] N.A. Soliman, A. Tagnit-hamou, Using glass sand as an alternative for quartz sand in UHPC, Construction and Building Materials. 145 (2017) 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.187.
36. [36] R. Wang, X. Gao, Relationship between flowability, entrapped air content and strength of UHPC mixtures containing different dosage of steel fiber, Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 6 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/app6080216.
37. [37] J. Dils, V. Boel, G. De Schutter, Vacuum mixing technology to improve the mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete, Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions. 48 (2015) 3485–3501. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0416-2.
38. [38] M. Seis, S. Subasi, B. Isbilir Kula, M. Marasli, Karbon nanotüplerin ultra yüksek performanslı betonların Mekanik ve fiziksel özelliklerine etkileri, Cumhuriyet Zirvesi ,4. Uluslararası Uygulamalı Bilimler Kongresi. (2021) 148–157.
39. [39] D.Y. Yoo, J.J. Park, S.W. Kim, Y.S. Yoon, Early age setting, shrinkage and tensile characteristics of ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete, Construction and Building Materials. 41 (2013) 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.015.
40. [40] M. Shariq, J. Prasad, A. Masood, Studies in ultrasonic pulse velocity of concrete containing GGBFS, Construction and Building Materials. 40 (2013) 944–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.070.
41. [41] N.A. Hamiruddin, R.A. Razak, K. Muhamad, M.Z.A.M. Zahid, C.N.S.C.A. Aziz, The Effect of Different Sand Gradation with Ultra High Performance Concrete ( UHPC ), Solid State Phenomena. 280 (2018) 476–480. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.280.476.
42. [42] N. Fodil, M. Chemrouk, A. Ammar, Influence of steel reinforcement on ultrasonic pulse velocity as a non-destructive evaluation of high-performance concrete strength, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering. 0 (2018) 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2018.1528890.
43. [43] T. Xu, J. Li, Assessing the spatial variability of the concrete by the rebound hammer test and compression test of drilled cores, Construction and Building Materials. 188 (2018) 820–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.138.
44. [44] J.A. Ortega, M. Gómez-Heras, R. Perez-López, E. Wohl, Multiscale structural and lithologic controls in the development of stream potholes on granite bedrock rivers, Geomorphology. 204 (2014) 588–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.09.005.
45. [45] Z. Song, X. Xue, Y. Li, J. Yang, Z. He, S. Shen, L. Jiang, W. Zhang, L. Xu, H. Zhang, J. Qu, W. Ji, T. Zhang, L. Huo, B. Wang, X. Lin, N. Zhang, Experimental exploration of the waterproofing mechanism of inorganic sodium silicate-based concrete sealers, Construction and Building Materials. 104 (2016) 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.069.
46. [46] M. Gomez-Heras, D. Benavente, C. Pla, J. Martinez-Martinez, R. Fort, V. Brotons, Ultrasonic pulse velocity as a way of improving uniaxial compressive strength estimations from Leeb hardness measurements, Construction and Building Materials. 261 (2020) 119996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119996.
47. [47] M.Á. García-Del-Cura, D. Benavente, J. Martínez-Martínez, N. Cueto, Sedimentary structures and physical properties of travertine and carbonate tufa building stone, Construction and Building Materials. 28 (2012) 456–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.042.