Topology Optimization Based Mass Reduction and Additive Manufacturing Approach: The Case of a Turbojet Engine Bracket

Abstract

In the aviation industry, the lightweighting of structural components such as bracket parts enables improved flight performance, reduced fuel consumption, and increased payload capacity. One of the prominent applications in this context is the creation of lightweight part designs that meet mechanical and structural requirements using topology optimization (TO) and the production of lightweight parts with complex geometries using additive manufacturing (AM) methods. In this study, TO was applied to the original bracket in increments of 10% within the range of 10% to 90% to determine the optimal design of a bracket carrying the torch igniter opening-closing valve assembly in turbojet engines. Numerical structural analysis was applied to each of the original and lightweight designs to examine the total deformation, von Mises stress, and safety factor values of the parts. The study concluded that the 40% lightweight design was the optimal design. The original and optimal parts were produced using the fused deposition modeling (FDM) method with polylactic acid (PLA) filament. The lightening ratio, which was 40.722% in the numerical data, was calculated as 43.62% as a result of production.

Keywords

• Topology optimization
• Additive manufacturing
• Mass reduction
• Finite element method
• Additive manufacturing design

Ethical Statement

The author of this article declares that the materials and methods they use in their work do not require ethical committee approval and/or legal-specific permission.

Thanks

We would like to thank TUSAŞ-Turkish Aerospace Industries Inc. for providing computer and laboratory facilities at Erciyes University for our studies.

Topoloji Optimizasyonu Tabanlı Kütle Azaltımı ve Eklemeli İmalat Yaklaşımı: Turbojet Motor Braketi Örneği

Abstract

Havacılık sektöründe braket parçaları gibi yapısal parçaların hafifletilmesi uçuş performansının geliştirilmesine, yakıt tüketiminin azaltılmasına ve faydalı yük taşıma kapasitesinin artırılmasına olanak tanımaktadır. Bu bağlamda öne çıkan uygulamalardan biri topoloji optimizasyonu (TO) kullanılarak mekanik ve yapısal gereksinimleri karşılayabilen hafif parça tasarımlarının oluşturulması ve eklemeli imalat yöntemleri (Eİ) kullanılarak, hafifletilen karmaşık geometrili parçaların üretilmesidir. Bu çalışmada, turbojet motorlarında meşale ateşleyici açma-kapama vana tertibatını taşıyan bir braketin optimum tasarımının belirlenmesi amacıyla, orijinal braket üzerinde %10’luk artışlarla %10- %90 aralığında TO uygulanmıştır. Orijinal ve hafifletilen tasarımların her birine sayısal yapısal analiz uygulanarak parçaların toplam deformasyon, von-Mises stres ve güvenlik faktörü değerleri incelenmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, %40 hafifletilen tasarımın optimum tasarım olduğu belirlenmiştir. Orijinal ve optimum parçalar polilaktik asit (PLA) filament kullanılarak eriyik yığma modelleme (FDM) yöntemi ile üretilmiştir. Sayısal verilerde %40,722 olan hafifletme oranı üretim sonucunda %43,62 olarak hesaplanmıştır.

Keywords

• Topoloji optimizasyonu
• Eklemeli imalat
• Kütle azaltma
• Sonlu elemanlar yöntemi
• Eklemeli imalat tasarımı

Ethical Statement

Bu makalenin yazarı çalışmalarında kullandıkları materyal ve yöntemlerin etik kurul izni ve/veya yasal-özel bir izin gerektirmediğini beyan ederler.

Thanks

Yaptığımız çalışmalarda Erciyes Üniversitesi bünyesinde bilgisayar ve laboratuvar imkânı sağlayan TUSAŞ-Türk Havacılık ve Uzay Sanayi A.Ş.’ye teşekkür ederiz.

References

1. [1] B. Xie, X. Wu, L. Liu, and Y. Zhang, “topological design of a hinger bracket based on additive manufacturing,” Materials, 16(11), (4061), (2023), doi: 10.3390/MA16114061.
2. [2] L. Berrocal et al., “topology optimization and additive manufacturing for aerospace components,” Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 4(2), (83–95), (2019), doi: 10.1007/S40964-018-0061-3/METRICS.
3. [3] A. Merulla et al., “weight reduction by topology optimization of an engine subframe mount, designed for additive manufacturing production,” Mater Today Proc, 19, (1014–1018), (2019), doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2019.08.015.
4. [4] A. W. Gebisa and H. G. Lemu, “a case study on topology optimized design for additive manufacturing,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 276(1), (012026), (2017), doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/276/1/012026.
5. [5] F. Yilmaz, M. Şahin, and E. Gürses, “weight reduction of an unmanned aerial vehicle pylon fitting by topology optimization and additive manufacturing with electron beam melting,” Journal of Additive Manufacturing Technologies, 1(2), (553), (2021), doi: 10.18416/JAMTECH.2111553.
6. [6] M. R. Koçak and İ. Korkut, “insansız hava aracı burun iniş takımı çatalı için topoloji optimizasyonu uygulaması,” Politeknik Dergisi, 26(4), (1393–1403), (2023), doi: 10.2339/POLITEKNIK.1099868.
7. [7] S. Mantovani, S. G. Barbieri, M. Giacopini, A. Croce, A. Sola, and E. Bassoli, “synergy between topology optimization and additive manufacturing in the automotive field,” Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf, 235(3), (555–567), (2021), doi: 10.1177/0954405420949209.
8. [8] A. Nazlı and N. Özsoy, “bir otomobil salıncağının topoloji optimizasyonu,” Uludağ University Journal of The Faculty of Engineering, 29(2), (607–622), (2024), doi: 10.17482/UUMFD.1431634.

9. [9] Y. Chen et al., “topology optimization design and experimental research of a 3D-printed metal aerospace bracket considering fatigue performance,” Applied Sciences, 11(15), (6671), (2021), doi: 10.3390/APP11156671.
10. [10] J. W. Chang and Y. S. Lee, “topology optimization of compressor bracket,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 22(9), (1668–1676), (2008), doi: 10.1007/S12206-008-0428-3/METRICS.
11. [11] O. Sigmund and K. Maute, “topology optimization approaches: A comparative review,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48(6), (1031–1055), (2013), doi: 10.1007/S00158-013-0978-6/FIGURES/2.
12. [12] O. Okorie, A. Perveen, D. Talamona, and K. Kostas, “topology optimization of an aerospace bracket: Numerical and experimental investigation,” Applied Sciences, 13(24), (13218), (2023), doi: 10.3390/APP132413218.
13. [13] M. Işık et al., “topology optimization and manufacturing of engine bracket using electron beam melting,” Journal of Additive Manufacturing Technologies, 1(3), (583), (2021), doi: 10.18416/JAMTECH.2111583.
14. [14] G. Shı, C. Guan, D. Quan, D. Wu, L. Tang, and T. Gao, “an aerospace bracket designed by thermo-elastic topology optimization and manufactured by additive manufacturing,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 33(4), (1252–1259), (2020), doi: 10.1016/J.CJA.2019.09.006.
15. [15] D. Walton and H. Moztarzadeh, “design and development of an additive manufactured component by topology optimisation,” Procedia CIRP, 60, (205–210), (2017), doi: 10.1016/J.PROCIR.2017.03.027.
16. [16] M. Seabra et al., “selective laser melting (SLM) and topology optimization for lighter aerospace componentes,” Procedia Structural Integrity, 1, (289–296), (2016), doi: 10.1016/J.PROSTR.2016.02.039.
17. [17] M. Tomlin and J. Meyer, “topology optimization of an additive layer manufactured (ALM) aerospace part,” Proceeding of the 7th Altair CAE technology conference, (2011).
18. [18] R. Păcurar and A. Păcurar, “finite element analysis to improve the accuracy of parts made by stainless steel 316L material using selective laser melting technology,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, 657, (236–240), (2014), doi: 10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/AMM.657.236.
19. [19] M. V. Mohiuddin, M. M. A. Khan and S. Ferhatullah Hussainy, “topology optimization of an aircraft bracket without shape control,” Int J Eng Res Appl, 10(11), (44–54), (2020), doi: 10.9790/9622-1011034454.
20. [20] A. M. Aliyi and H. G. Lemu, “case study on topology optimized design for additive manufacturing,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 659(1), (012020), (2019), doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/659/1/012020.
21. [21] M. P. Bendsøe and O. Sigmund, topology optimization. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (2004). doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-05086-6.
22. [22] A. B. Bodog and G. Grebenişan, “an integrated approach of topological optimization with parametric validation and response surfaces, using ANSYS ®,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 1256(1), (012014), (2022), doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1256/1/012014.