Tasarımcıların Yaratıcılık, Bütünleştirme, Kavramsallaştırma ve Uygulama Becerileri Üzerine Çizim Tekniklerinin Etkileri

Year 2020, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 486 - 499, 27.09.2020

Filiz Şenler Kemal Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.29109/gujsc.694210

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, tasarım alanında yaygın olarak kullanılan dijital tasarım teknolojilerinin sunduğu imkânların ve yeniliklerin, tasarımcıların yaratıcılık/özgünlük, bütünleştirme, kavramsallaştırma ve uygulama becerileri üzerindeki etkileri araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada, dijital teknolojinin etkilediği tasarım stüdyolarında, tasarım sürecinde kullanılan manuel çizim (MD) ve bilgisayar destekli tasarım (CAD) tekniklerinin, tasarımcıların yaratıcılık, bütünleştirme, kavramsallaştırma ve uygulama becerileri üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiştir. Araştırma anketinde, çizim tekniklerinin tasarım eğitimcileri ve öğrencilerinin tasarım performansını oluşturan yaratıcılık/özgünlük, bütünleştirme, kavramsallaştırma ve uygulama becerileri üzerindeki etkilerini öğrenmek için üç seçenekli toplamda 34 soru bulunmaktadır. Anketten elde edilen sonuçlar, tasarım stüdyolarında MD+CAD tekniklerinin birlikte kullanıldığı durumlarda, öğrencilerin yaratıcılık/özgünlük, bütünleştirme, kavramsallaştırma ve uygulama becerileri üzerinde daha olumlu etkilerinin olabileceğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

Çizim Teknikleri, Yaratıcılık, Bütünleştirme, Kavramsallaştırma, Uygulama

Thanks

Araştırma anketini doldurarak, verdiği destekten dolayı değerli öğretim üyelerine ve öğrencilere çok teşekkür ederiz.

Effects of Drawing Techniques on Designers' Creativity, Integration, Conceptualization and Application Skills

Abstract

In this research, the effects of the opportunities and innovations offered by digital design technologies commonly used in the field of design on the creativity / originality, integration, conceptualization and application skills that constitute the performance of the designers were investigated. In the study, the effects of manual drawing (MD) and computer aided design (CAD) techniques used in the design process on the performance of designers in design studios affected by digital technology were examined. In the research questionnaire, there are 34 questions in total with three options to learn the effects of drawing techniques on design performance of design educators and students. The results obtained from the questionnaire show that when MD + CAD techniques are used together in design studios, students may have more positive effects on design performance.

Keywords

Drawing Techniques, Creativity, Integration, Conceptualization, Application

References

• [1] Onur, D., Zorlu, T. (2017). Tasarım Stüdyolarında Uygulanan Eğitim Metotları ve Yaratıcılık İlişkisi, The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication – TOJDAC, Volume 7 Issue 4, 542,555.
• [2] Güneş, H., Bıçakcı, S., Orta, E. ve Akdaş, D. (2019). Akıllı evlerde kullanılan yapay zekâ teknikleri için simülasyon geliştirilmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji, 7 (3) , 554-563.
• [3] Cross, N. (1999). Natural intelligence in design. Design Studies, 20(1), 25-39.
• [4] Purcell, A.T., Gero. J.S. (1998). Drawings and the design process. A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology. Design Studies, 19(4), 389-430.
• [5] Özkan, A., Yıldırım, K., (2016). Comparison of Conventional and Computer-aided Drafting Methods from the View of Time and Drafting Quality, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Issue 62, 239-254.
• [6] McLaren, S.V. (2008). Exploring perceptions and attitudes towards teaching and learning manual technical drawing in a digital age. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(2), 167-188.
• [7] Kashef, A.E. (1993). A comparison of the effectiveness between computer aided drafting and the traditional drafting techniques as methods of teaching pictorial and multiview drawings. Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS /ED368935.pdf.
• [8] Brandon, L., McLain-Kark, J. (2001). Effects of hand-drawing and CAD techniques on design development: A comparison of design merit ratings. Journal of Interior Design, 27(2), 26-34.
• [9] Callieri, M., Cignoni, P., Scopigno, R., Gori, G., & Risaliti, M. (2006). Beyond manual drafting: A restoration-oriented system. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 7(3), 214-226.
• [10] Senyapili, B., Basa, I. (2006). The shifting tides of academe: Oscillation between hand and computer in architectural education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(3), 273-283.
• [11] Downey, G.L. (1992). Human agency in CAD/CAM technology. Anthropology Today, 8(5), 2-6.
• [12] Yıldırım, K. Hidayetoglu, M.L. (2013). Ergonomic Effects of Conventional and Computer-Aided Drawing, Pensee Journal, Vol. 75, No: 12, pp.122-135.
• [13] Yildirim, K., Kasal, O. (2005). Çizim mekânlarında insan-eylem-donatı elemanı ilişkileri üzerine bir araştırma [An investigation on the human-action-equipment relationships in drawing spaces]. Politeknik Dergisi, 8(3), 289-299.
• [14] Case, F.D., Matthews, C. (1999). Integration of student owned computers into the design curriculum: Policy, issues, and experience. Journal of Interior Design, 25(1), 45-56.
• [15] Bhavnani, S.K., John, B.E. (1996). Exploring the unrealized potential of computer-aided drafting. In: CHI '96 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Common ground. 332-339.
• [16] Flemming, U., Bhavnani, S.K., John, B.E. (1997). Mismatched metaphor: User vs system model in computer aided drafting. Design Studies, 18, 349-368.
• [17] Magi, R. (2009). Rational drafting. In: 10th International Conference on Engineering Graphics BALTGRAF–10. Retrieved January 12, 2011, from http://old.vgtu.lt/leidiniai /leidykla/Balgraf_10/PDF/13_Magi.pdf
• [18] Beitz, W., Langner, T., Luczak, H., Müller, T., Springer, J. (1990). Evaluation of a compact CAD course in laboratory experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2(2), 111-135.
• [19] Majchrzak, A. (1990). Effect of CAD on the jobs of drafters and engineers: A quantitative case study. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 32(3), 245-262.
• [20] Rafi, A., Samsudin, K.A., Ismail, A. (2006). On improving spatial ability through computer-mediated engineering drawing instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 149-159.
• [21] Yıldırım, K., Capanoğlu, A., Cağatay, K. (2011). The Effects of Physical Environmental Factors on Students' Perceptions in Computer Classrooms, Indoor and Built Environment , Volume 20 Issue 5, pp. 501 - 510.
• [22] Kırcı, N., Yıldırım, K. (2013). How the Enthusiasm and Pre-Knowledge of First Year Architectural Students Effects Their Educational Performance, G.U. Journal of Science, 26 (4): 619-625.
• [23] Gökbulut, N., Yıldırım, K. (2018). Effects on Students’ Perceptual Performance of the Densities of Drawing Table in Design Studios, Online Journal of Art and Design, Vol. 6 Iss: 4, 168-182.
• [24] Yıldırım, K., Hidayetoğlu, M.L., Gökbulut, N., Müezzinoğlu, M.K. (2019). Effects on Students’ Perceptual Evaluations of the Wall Colors Used in Design Studios by the Virtual Reality Method, ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, Vol. 7, No. 1, 99-120.
• [25] Cronbach, L.J. (1951). “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests”, Psychometrika, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 297-334.
• [26] Kaplan, R.M., Saccuzzo, D.P. (2009). Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues, Cengage Learning, Boston, Massachusetts.
• [27] Panayides, P. (2013). “Coefficient alpha: interpret with caution”, Europe’s Journal of Psychology, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 687-696.