Examination of Urban Transformation Implementation Legislation: Elazığ Example

Year 2024, Erken Görünüm, 1 - 1

Belkıs Elyiğit Cevdet Emin Ekinci

https://doi.org/10.29109/gujsc.1299085

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to examine and reveal the general results of the models applied in urban transformation works in Elazığ province after the 6.8 Mw Sivrice earthquake on January 24, 2020. The population of the research, Elazığ province sample, is Karşıyaka, Cumhuriyet, Abdullahpaşa, Mustafapaşa, Rüstempaşa, Sürsürü, Kızılay and Sivrice Country Gölbaşı Neighborhoods. The study is qualitative research in the form of a field study in terms of revealing the results of urban transformation implementation at the sample points. In this context, observation technique, interview technique, and documentary scanning technique were used in the descriptive analysis. General physical-structural characteristics of buildings in the observation technique; in the interview technique, 100 building owners and users' opinions about the buildings; In the documentary scanning technique, the reflections of literature information in practice are interpreted as a whole. In comparing the literature information, project technical documents obtained from the Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change and Elazığ Municipality were used. As a result, the model to be chosen in the urban transformation process is an important parameter in the success of the application and reaching the desired goal. More qualified urban transformation applications will be achieved by reducing the problems that arise in public transformation projects, especially in determining the legislation, and by choosing the appropriate model for comprehensive transformation.

Keywords

Urban Transformation, Urban Transformation Models, Legislation, Urbanization, Elazığ

References

• [1] Damgacı T. Kentsel Dönüşüm Projeleri ve Kamu Yararı: Meram Belediyesi Kentsel Dönüşüm Projeleri. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi. 2020; 55(4): 2478-2498.
• [2] Aydurmuş B. Kentsel Dönüşüm Alanlarında Uygunluk Analizi: Gümüşhane Örneği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Gümüşhane, 2017.
• [3] Doğan M. Afet Riski Altındaki Alanların Dönüştürülmesi: Yıldırım Belediyesi Örneği, Dönem Projesi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2018.
• [4] Ekinci CE, Elyiğit B. Kentsel Dönüşüm. Ankara: Data Yayınları, Türkiye, 2022.
• [5] Şahin SZ. Türkiye’de Kentsel Dönüşüme İlişkin Alternatif Bir Model Önerisi: Çok Düzlemli Mekânsal Vizyon Dönüşümü. http://ankaraarsivi.atilim.edu.tr/shares/ankara/files/makaleler /szt.pdf.
• [6] Gün A, Pak B, Demir Y. Responding to the Urban Transformation Challenges in Turkey: A Participatory Design Model for Istanbul. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development. 2021; 13(1): 32-55.
• [7] Kandaloğlu N. Kentsel Dönüşüm ve Bir Dağıtım Modeli Önerisi. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2012.
• [8] Yıldız S, Kıvrak S, Arslan G. Contribution of Built Environment Design Elements to the Sustainability of Urban Renewal Projects: Model Proposal. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 2019; 145: 1.
• [9] Körlü E. Kentsel Sit Alanlarında Sürdürülebilir Koruma-Geliştirme İçin Bir Model Önerisi: Adana Tepebağ-Kayalıbağ Mevkii. Doktora Tezi, Konya Teknik Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Konya, 2020.
• [10] Covelli CI. Transit-Oriented Development as a Tool of Urban Transformation Addressed at Urban Regeneration Processes. Innovating Strategies and Solutions for Urban Performance and Regeneration. 2022; 61-73.
• [11] Zinoski M, Dimitrievski T. Urban transformation of Miroslav Krleza Street, Skopje. Current Aspects of Real Estate Research. 2020; 18-32.
• [12] Chang S, Yoshida T, Castro-Lacouture D, Yamagata Y. Block-Level Building Transformation Strategies for Energy Efficiency, Thermal Comfort, and Visibility Using Bayesian Multilevel Modeling. Journal of Architectural Engineering. 2021; 27: 3.
• [13] Sabeeh Lafta F, Antón García D, Venus Suleiman A, Salah Lafta Z, Khalid Safaa H. Factors Influencing the Transformation of Iraqi Holy Cities: The Case of Al-Najaf. Engineering and Environmental Sciences. 2021; 30(2): 365–375.
• [14] Wheeler SM. Beatley T. The Sustainable Urban Development Reader (Third Edition). Urban Reader Series, London, Routledge, 2014.
• [15] Dalla Longa R. Urban Models, In: Urban Models and Public-Private Partnership. Springer-Verlag, 2011; 7-46. [16] Lehmann S. Introduction: The Complex Process of City Regeneration, Urban Regeneration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2019.
• [17] Wolfram M. Assessing Transformative Capacity for Sustainable Urban Regeneration: A Comparative Study of Three South Korean Cities. Ambio (Springer). 2019; 48(5): 478–493. doi:10.1007/s13280-018-1111-2.
• [18] Fırat Üniversitesi Yapı ve Beton Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi, 24 Ocak 2020 Mw Sivrice Depremi. Elazığ Bölgesi Yapısal Hasarlar İnceleme ve Değerlendirme Raporu. Rapor No: 2020/D001.
• [19] Google Earth. https://www.google.com.tr/intl/tr/earth/.
• [20] Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığ. https://www.csb.gov.tr/.
• [21] Elazığ Belediyesi. https://www.elazig.bel.tr/.
• [22] 5393 Sayılı Belediye Kanunu. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.5.5393.pdf.
• [23] 6306 Sayılı Afet Riski Altındaki Alanların Dönüştürülmesi Hakkında Kanun. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.5.6306.pdf.
• [24] 7269 Sayılı Umumi Hayata Müessir Afetler Dolayısıyla Alınacak Tedbirlerle Yapılacak Yardımlara Dair Kanun. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.3.7269.pdf.
• [25] Elyiğit B, Kentsel Dönüşüm Uygulamaları ve Sonuçları: Elazığ Örneklemi. Doktora Semineri, Fırat Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elazığ, 2022.