Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Sinyal Kontrollü ve Kontrolsüz Kesimlerde Yayaların Karşıdan Karşıya Geçiş Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 309 - 320, 15.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.567528

Abstract

Yayaların, yol kesimlerinde ve sinyalizasyonlu kavşaklarda, karşıdan
karşıya geçiş davranışının doğru anlaşılması ve buna göre altyapının
düzenlenmesi ulaşım planlamasının önemli konularından biridir. Çalışmada, kent
merkezinde yayaların geçiş davranışlarını araştırmak amacıyla, yaya hızlarını
etkileyen parametreler analiz edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Isparta ili şehir merkezinde
bulunan bir ana cadde üzerinde, yayaların karşıdan karşıya geçişleri dört
kesime ayrılmış,  toplam 3632 yaya örneği
gözlenmiştir. İncelenen 2., 3. ve 4. Kesimlerdeki yaya hacmi ile hız arasındaki
ilişki tespit edilmiştir. İncelenen kavşak 1. kesimdeki yaya geçidini kullanan
ve yaya geçidi dışından geçen yayalar ayrı değerlendirilmiştir. ANOVA testi ile
yaya hızını etkileyen faktörlerin önem dereceleri bulunmuştur. Analiz sonucu kavşak
içindeki yaya geçidi geçişlerinde yaşlı, yetişkin ve çocuk yayalar için
ortalama geçiş hızları sırasıyla 0.77 m/sn, 0.90 m/sn ve 0.78 olarak; yol
kesimlerinde ise 0.87 m/sn, 0.95 m/sn ve 0.90 m/sn olarak tespit edilmiştir. Yayaların
kavşak dışı veya kural ihlali yaparak geçme davranışının yoğun yaşandığı kavşak
kesiminde, güvenli yaya geçişi için yeterli yaya geçidi genişliğinin olmadığı
düşünülmüştür. Çalışma sonuçlarının uygulayıcılar için sinyalize kavşaklarda ve
yol kesimlerinde yaya davranışını anlamlandırılması ve oluşturulacak yaya
geçidi tesislerinin düzenlenmesinde, faydalı olması beklenmektedir.

References

  • Alhajyaseen, W.K.M. ve Miho I.A., 2017. Studying Critical Pedestrian Behavioral Changes For The Safety Assessment at Signalized Crosswalks. Safety Science, 91, 351-360.
  • Caputcu, M., Sengoz, B., Ozuysal, M., Tanyel, S., Kaplan, S., Karabayir, A., 2016. Use Of Laser Measurements And Video Images To Investigate Pedestrian Movement Along Non-Uniform Sidewalks. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE’16), Prague, Czech Republic, 30-31.
  • Dommes, A., Cavallo, V., Vienne, F. ve Aillerie, I., 2012. Age-related differences in street-crossing safety before and after training of older pedestrians. Journal of Accident Analysis and Prevention, 44, 42–47.
  • Garber, N. ve Hoel, L., 2009. Traffic and Highways Engineering. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia, West Publishing Company, ISBN 0314601767
  • Guo, H., Gao, Z., Yang, X. ve Jiang, X., 2011. Modeling Pedestrian Violation Behavior At Signalized Crosswalks İn China: A Hazards-Based Duration Approach. Journal of Traffic Injury Prevention, 12, 96–103.
  • HCM, 2010. Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research.
  • Homburger, W., S. ve Kell, J., H., 1981. Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering. 10th Edition, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Course Notes.
  • LaPlante, J. ve Kaeser, T. P., 2007. A History of Pedestrian Signal Walking Speed Assumptions. 3rd Urban Street Symp., Seattle, Washington, USA, 1–8s.
  • Liu, Y.C. ve Tung, Y.C., 2014. Risk Analysis Of Pedestrians’ Road-Crossing Decisions: Effects of Age, Time Gap, Time of Day and Vehicle Speed. Journal of Safety Sience, 63, 77–82.
  • Lobjois, R., Benguigui, N. ve Cavallo, V., 2013. The Effects of Age and Traffic Density on Streetcrossing Behavior. Journal of Accident Analysis and Prevention, 53, 166–175.
  • MUTCD, 2009., Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, Http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov
  • Marisamynathan ve Perumal, V., 2014. Study On Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Signalized İntersections. Journal of Traffic And Transportation Engineering, 1 (2), 103-110.
  • Muley, D., Alhajyaseen, W., Kharbeche, M. ve Al-Salem, M., 2018. Pedestrians’ speed analysis at signalized crosswalks. Procedia Computer Science, 130, 567-574.
  • NPA., 2012., Traffic Accident Situation: Monthly Report. National Police Agency, Http://www.npa.go.jp/english
  • Önelçin, 2014. Sinyalize Kavşaklarda Yayaların Karşıdan Karşıya Geçme Davranışlarının İncelenmesi Ve Yayaların Güvenli Aralık Algılarının Belirlenmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  • Onelcin, P., Alver, Y., 2017. The Crossing Speed And Safety Margin Of Pedestrians At Signalized Intersections. Transportation Research Procedia, 22, 3-12.
  • Rengaraju, V.R. ve Rao, V.T., 1995. Vehicle-Arrival Characteristics at Urban Uncontrolled Intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 121(4), 317-323.
  • Rouphail, N., J. Hummer, P. Allen ve J. Milazzo, 1998. Recommended Procedures for Chapter 13, Pedestrians, of the Highway Capacity Manual. Report FFHWARD-98-107, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C.
  • Sadeghpour, M., Sanajou, K., Öğüt, K. S., 2017. Determination of Pedestrian Arrival Headway Distribution at Signalized Crosswalks In Istanbul. Sigma Journal Of Engineering And Natural Sciences, 8(4), 325-337.
  • Tuydes-Yaman, H., Karatas, P., 2017. Evaluation of Walkability and Pedestrian Level of Service, in Engineering Tools and Solutions For Sustainable Transportation Planning. 30-57. IGI Global.

Evaluation of Parameters Affecting the Crossing Behavior of Pedestrians on the Main Arterials and Signalized Intersections

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 309 - 320, 15.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.567528

Abstract

Accurate
understanding of the crossing behavior of pedestrians at road sections and
signalzed intersections is an important issue of transportation planning. In
this study, the parameters affecting the pedestrian walking speed are tried to
be analyzed in order to investigate the transition behavior of pedestrians in
the city center. Surveyed section was divided into four sections and a total of
3632 pedestrians were observed in the city center of Isparta, on a main street.
The
relationship between the pedestrian volume and the velocity of pedestrian in
the 2nd, 3rd and 4th sections were determined.
Pedestrians who used crossing or not used were investigated separetely
at selected intersection.
The
significance levels of the factors affecting pedestrian velocity were
determined by ANOVA test.
As a result
of the analysis, the average transition velocities for elderly, adult and child
pedestrians are 0.77 m/s, 0.90 m/s and 0.78; and 0.87 m/s, 0.95 m/s and 0.90
m/s respectively. It is considered that there is not enough crosswalk width for
safe pedestrian crossing at the intersection where pedestrians are experiencing
intense crossing or rule violation.
It
is expected that the results of the study will be useful for the practitioners
in signalized intersections and road sections to be able to understand the
pedestrian behavior and to arrange the pedestrian crossing facilities.

References

  • Alhajyaseen, W.K.M. ve Miho I.A., 2017. Studying Critical Pedestrian Behavioral Changes For The Safety Assessment at Signalized Crosswalks. Safety Science, 91, 351-360.
  • Caputcu, M., Sengoz, B., Ozuysal, M., Tanyel, S., Kaplan, S., Karabayir, A., 2016. Use Of Laser Measurements And Video Images To Investigate Pedestrian Movement Along Non-Uniform Sidewalks. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE’16), Prague, Czech Republic, 30-31.
  • Dommes, A., Cavallo, V., Vienne, F. ve Aillerie, I., 2012. Age-related differences in street-crossing safety before and after training of older pedestrians. Journal of Accident Analysis and Prevention, 44, 42–47.
  • Garber, N. ve Hoel, L., 2009. Traffic and Highways Engineering. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia, West Publishing Company, ISBN 0314601767
  • Guo, H., Gao, Z., Yang, X. ve Jiang, X., 2011. Modeling Pedestrian Violation Behavior At Signalized Crosswalks İn China: A Hazards-Based Duration Approach. Journal of Traffic Injury Prevention, 12, 96–103.
  • HCM, 2010. Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research.
  • Homburger, W., S. ve Kell, J., H., 1981. Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering. 10th Edition, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Course Notes.
  • LaPlante, J. ve Kaeser, T. P., 2007. A History of Pedestrian Signal Walking Speed Assumptions. 3rd Urban Street Symp., Seattle, Washington, USA, 1–8s.
  • Liu, Y.C. ve Tung, Y.C., 2014. Risk Analysis Of Pedestrians’ Road-Crossing Decisions: Effects of Age, Time Gap, Time of Day and Vehicle Speed. Journal of Safety Sience, 63, 77–82.
  • Lobjois, R., Benguigui, N. ve Cavallo, V., 2013. The Effects of Age and Traffic Density on Streetcrossing Behavior. Journal of Accident Analysis and Prevention, 53, 166–175.
  • MUTCD, 2009., Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, Http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov
  • Marisamynathan ve Perumal, V., 2014. Study On Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Signalized İntersections. Journal of Traffic And Transportation Engineering, 1 (2), 103-110.
  • Muley, D., Alhajyaseen, W., Kharbeche, M. ve Al-Salem, M., 2018. Pedestrians’ speed analysis at signalized crosswalks. Procedia Computer Science, 130, 567-574.
  • NPA., 2012., Traffic Accident Situation: Monthly Report. National Police Agency, Http://www.npa.go.jp/english
  • Önelçin, 2014. Sinyalize Kavşaklarda Yayaların Karşıdan Karşıya Geçme Davranışlarının İncelenmesi Ve Yayaların Güvenli Aralık Algılarının Belirlenmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  • Onelcin, P., Alver, Y., 2017. The Crossing Speed And Safety Margin Of Pedestrians At Signalized Intersections. Transportation Research Procedia, 22, 3-12.
  • Rengaraju, V.R. ve Rao, V.T., 1995. Vehicle-Arrival Characteristics at Urban Uncontrolled Intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 121(4), 317-323.
  • Rouphail, N., J. Hummer, P. Allen ve J. Milazzo, 1998. Recommended Procedures for Chapter 13, Pedestrians, of the Highway Capacity Manual. Report FFHWARD-98-107, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C.
  • Sadeghpour, M., Sanajou, K., Öğüt, K. S., 2017. Determination of Pedestrian Arrival Headway Distribution at Signalized Crosswalks In Istanbul. Sigma Journal Of Engineering And Natural Sciences, 8(4), 325-337.
  • Tuydes-Yaman, H., Karatas, P., 2017. Evaluation of Walkability and Pedestrian Level of Service, in Engineering Tools and Solutions For Sustainable Transportation Planning. 30-57. IGI Global.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Meltem Saplıoğlu 0000-0002-6590-8672

Abdullah Ridha Faısal 0000-0002-6812-0426

Publication Date April 15, 2020
Submission Date May 19, 2019
Acceptance Date January 9, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Saplıoğlu, M., & Faısal, A. R. (2020). Sinyal Kontrollü ve Kontrolsüz Kesimlerde Yayaların Karşıdan Karşıya Geçiş Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(2), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.567528