Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Türkiye-AB Geri Kabul Anlaşması: AB-Türkiye Göç Diyalogu Üzerine Bir Eleştiri (İngilizce Makale)

Year 2017, Volume: 13 Issue: 25, 1 - 26, 27.04.2017
https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.309396

Abstract

Avrupa’ya göç sorunu Avrupa Birliği (AB) perspektifinden bakıldığında “kriz” halini almıştır. Orta Doğu ve Afrika gibi siyasi istikrarsızlıkların yaşandığı bölgelerden gelen göçmen ve mültecilerin sayısının artması veya en bilinen örneğiyle Suriye’de olduğu gibi savaştan zarar görmüş ülkelerden Avrupa’ya daha iyi bir hayat arayışıyla mülteci olarak gelenler Avrupalı politika yapıcıları için karmaşık zorluklar oluşturmaktadır. Avrupa yasadışı göç ile farklı yollar ve politika araçları üzerinden mücadele etmektedir. Geri kabul anlaşmaları AB için göç ile mücadelede önemli bir bileşendir. Üçüncü nesil geri kabul anlaşmaları, özellikle üçüncü ülkelerden gelen düzensiz göç akışını hedefleyerek, genel olarak AB’ye sınır veya sınır yakını ve özel olarak da AB’ye göç baskısı oluşturan ülkelerle imzalanmaya çalışılmaktadır. Bu noktada, Türkiye, Doğu Akdeniz’den Avrupa’ya göç etmek isteyen yasa dışı göçmenlerin ana rotalarından biridir. Sorunun önemi üzerinden, Türkiye ile imzalanan Geri Kabul Anlaşması ve vize serbestleştirilmesine yönelik yol haritası da bu bakış açısından değerlendirilmelidir. Bu makale AB-Türkiye ilişkilerinde söz konusu Anlaşma’nın zamanlaması ve muhtemel etkileri üzerine odaklanmakta ve Geri Kabul Anlaşması’nın etkilerini dış yönetişim ve insan güvenliği kavramları üzerinden tartışmaktadır. Bu nedenle ilk olarak hukuki yapı ve AB hukukundaki rolü ve AB’nin geri kabul anlaşmalarına karşı tutumunu analiz edeceğiz. İkinci olarak Türkiye ile imzalanan Geri Kabul Anlaşması’nın AB ve Türkiye arasındaki ilişkilere etkisini inceleyeceğiz. Üçüncü olarak da Türkiye-AB Geri Kabul Anlaşması hükümleri dış yönetişim ve insan güvenliği kavramları üzerinden analiz edilerek AB sınır güvenliği mekanizmalarının çağdaş formları sorgulanacaktır.

References

  • GAMMELTOFT-HANSEN, Thomas, “Outsourcing Asylum: The Advent of Protection Lite”, in L. Bialasiewicz (Ed.), Europe and the World: EU Geopolitics and the Transformation of European Space. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2011.
  • KÖSE, Melike Akkaraca, Güvensizlik Sarmalında AB Göç Politikalarına Uyum, Türkiye’nin Dış Politika Tercihlerinde Rasyonalitenin Sınırları, Derin Yayınları, İstanbul, 2014.
  • AÇIKGÖZ, Meral, “Turkey’s Visa Policy: A Migration- Mobility Nexus, Summer 2015”, Turkish Policy Quarterly, September 14, 2015, (Acces Date: 24.12.2015) http://turkishpolicy.com/article/762/ turkeys-visa-policy-a-migration-mobility-nexus-summer-2015.
  • ANDROSIK, Ana, “Human Security and Economic Empowerment. Multi-Ethnic Women’s Representations in the Small and Medium Enterprise Sector. Selected Cases From Kosovo”, Transcultural Studies, Vol. 2, No.3, 2006- 2007, pp. 109-121.
  • BOUTEILLET- PAQUET, Daphné, “Passing the Buck: A Critical Analysis of the Readmission Policy Implemented by the European Union and its Member States”, European Journal of Migration and Law, Vol. 5, Number 3, 2003, pp. 359-377.
  • BULMER, Simon, and Stephen Padgett, “Policy Transfer in the European Union: An Institutionalist Perspective”, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 35, Number 1, January 2005, pp. 103-126.
  • BÜRGIN, Alexander, “European Commission’s Agency Meets Ankara’s Agenda: Why Turkey is Ready for a Readmission Agreement”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 19, Number 6, August 2012, pp. 883-899.
  • CARDWELL, Paul James, “New Modes of Governance in the External Dimension of EU Migration Policy”, International Migration, Vol. 51 (6) 2013, pp. 54-67.
  • İÇDUYGU, Ahmet, “The Irregular Migration Corridor between the EU and Turkey: Is it Possible to Block it with a Readmission Agreement”, EU-US Immigration Systems No 14, European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, 2011.
  • KING, Gary and, Christopher J. L. Murray, “Rethinking Human Security”, Political Sciences Quarterly, Vol. 116, No. 4, Winter 2001- 2002, pp. 585-610.
  • KOORNEV, Oleg, “Exchanging Knowledge, Enhancing Capacities, Developing Mechanisms: IOM’s Role in the Implementation of the EU–Russia Readmission Agreement”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2014, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 888- 904.
  • LAVENEX, Sandra, “Shifting up and out: The Foreign Policy of European Immigration Control”, West European Politics, 29/2, 2006, pp. 329-350.
  • LAVANEX, Sandra and Frank Schimmelfennig, “EU Rules Beyond EU Borders: Theorizing External Governance in European Politics”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 16, Number 6, September 2009, pp. 791-812.
  • PAPAGIANNI, Georgia, “Forging an External EU Migration Policy: From Externalisation of Border Management to a Comprehensive Policy?”, European Journal of Migration and Law, 15 (2013), pp. 283-299.
  • PICCIOTTO, Robert, “Why the World Needs Millennium Security Goals”, Conflict, Security and Development, Vol. 6, Number 1, 2006, pp. 111-120.
  • VAUGHAN-WILLIAMS, Nick, “We are not animals!” Humanitarian border security and zoo political spaces in Europe”, Political Geography, No: 45, 2015, pp. 1-10.
  • COM 2011(76 final), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Evaluation of EU Readmission Agreements, Brussels, 23.2.2011.
  • COM (2016) 166 final, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Next Operational Steps in EU-Turkey Cooperation in the Field of Migration, Brussels, 16. 3.2016.
  • Council Decision Concerning the Conclusion of the Agreement Between the European Union and Republic of Turkey on the Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorization, COM (2012) 239 Final, Brussels, 22.06.2012.
  • European Commission, Roadmap towards a Visa- Free Regime with Turkey. Internet access 20.03.2014, http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-is-new/news/news/docs/20131216-roadmap_towards_the_ visafree_regime_with_turkey_en.pdf?utm_source=Weekly+Legal+Update&utm_campaign=fdb688b29cWLU_20_12_2013&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_7176f0fc3d-fdb688b29c-419648261
  • First Meeting of the EU- Turkey Visa Liberalization Dialogue Agreed Minutes, Article. 2, 4. (Access Date: 18.03.2014), http://www.mfa.gov. tr/data/agreed%20minutes%20ve%20annotated%20roadmap.pdf.

Turkish-EU Readmission Agreement: A Critique of EU-Turkey Migration Dialogue

Year 2017, Volume: 13 Issue: 25, 1 - 26, 27.04.2017
https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.309396

Abstract

Europe’s immigration problem became a “crisis” from the EU perspective. The growing numbers of migrants and asylum seekers fleeing from politically destabilized regions like the Middle East and Africa or war-torn countries, most notably from Syria, as well as people who just looking for a better life seeking refuge in Europe, poses complex challenges for European policymakers. Europe deals with the illegal immigration via number of ways and policy instruments. Readmission agreements are one of the important components for the EU to tackle with the immigration issue. The third generation readmission agreements, particularly targeting irregular migration flow from third countries, are generally trying to be ratified with border neighbors/near border countries of the EU and especially with the ones that put migration pressure to the Union. Here, Turkey is one of the major routes of illegal migrants from the Eastern Mediterranean to Europe. Given the magnitude of the problem, recently signed Readmission Agreement and visa liberalization roadmap with Turkey should be viewed from this perspective. This article focuses on the timing and the possible impact of the Agreement on the EU-Turkey relations and it discusses the effect of the Readmission Agreement under the external governance and human security concepts. We, first of all, will analyze juridical structure and its role in EU law and attitude of EU towards readmission agreements. Secondly, we will study the readmission agreement with Turkey and its effects in terms of Turkey’s relationship with the EU. Third, clauses of the Turkey-EU Readmission Agreement will be analyzed from external governance and human security concepts and questions characteristics of contemporary forms of border security mechanisms of the EU.

References

  • GAMMELTOFT-HANSEN, Thomas, “Outsourcing Asylum: The Advent of Protection Lite”, in L. Bialasiewicz (Ed.), Europe and the World: EU Geopolitics and the Transformation of European Space. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2011.
  • KÖSE, Melike Akkaraca, Güvensizlik Sarmalında AB Göç Politikalarına Uyum, Türkiye’nin Dış Politika Tercihlerinde Rasyonalitenin Sınırları, Derin Yayınları, İstanbul, 2014.
  • AÇIKGÖZ, Meral, “Turkey’s Visa Policy: A Migration- Mobility Nexus, Summer 2015”, Turkish Policy Quarterly, September 14, 2015, (Acces Date: 24.12.2015) http://turkishpolicy.com/article/762/ turkeys-visa-policy-a-migration-mobility-nexus-summer-2015.
  • ANDROSIK, Ana, “Human Security and Economic Empowerment. Multi-Ethnic Women’s Representations in the Small and Medium Enterprise Sector. Selected Cases From Kosovo”, Transcultural Studies, Vol. 2, No.3, 2006- 2007, pp. 109-121.
  • BOUTEILLET- PAQUET, Daphné, “Passing the Buck: A Critical Analysis of the Readmission Policy Implemented by the European Union and its Member States”, European Journal of Migration and Law, Vol. 5, Number 3, 2003, pp. 359-377.
  • BULMER, Simon, and Stephen Padgett, “Policy Transfer in the European Union: An Institutionalist Perspective”, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 35, Number 1, January 2005, pp. 103-126.
  • BÜRGIN, Alexander, “European Commission’s Agency Meets Ankara’s Agenda: Why Turkey is Ready for a Readmission Agreement”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 19, Number 6, August 2012, pp. 883-899.
  • CARDWELL, Paul James, “New Modes of Governance in the External Dimension of EU Migration Policy”, International Migration, Vol. 51 (6) 2013, pp. 54-67.
  • İÇDUYGU, Ahmet, “The Irregular Migration Corridor between the EU and Turkey: Is it Possible to Block it with a Readmission Agreement”, EU-US Immigration Systems No 14, European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, 2011.
  • KING, Gary and, Christopher J. L. Murray, “Rethinking Human Security”, Political Sciences Quarterly, Vol. 116, No. 4, Winter 2001- 2002, pp. 585-610.
  • KOORNEV, Oleg, “Exchanging Knowledge, Enhancing Capacities, Developing Mechanisms: IOM’s Role in the Implementation of the EU–Russia Readmission Agreement”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2014, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 888- 904.
  • LAVENEX, Sandra, “Shifting up and out: The Foreign Policy of European Immigration Control”, West European Politics, 29/2, 2006, pp. 329-350.
  • LAVANEX, Sandra and Frank Schimmelfennig, “EU Rules Beyond EU Borders: Theorizing External Governance in European Politics”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 16, Number 6, September 2009, pp. 791-812.
  • PAPAGIANNI, Georgia, “Forging an External EU Migration Policy: From Externalisation of Border Management to a Comprehensive Policy?”, European Journal of Migration and Law, 15 (2013), pp. 283-299.
  • PICCIOTTO, Robert, “Why the World Needs Millennium Security Goals”, Conflict, Security and Development, Vol. 6, Number 1, 2006, pp. 111-120.
  • VAUGHAN-WILLIAMS, Nick, “We are not animals!” Humanitarian border security and zoo political spaces in Europe”, Political Geography, No: 45, 2015, pp. 1-10.
  • COM 2011(76 final), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Evaluation of EU Readmission Agreements, Brussels, 23.2.2011.
  • COM (2016) 166 final, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Next Operational Steps in EU-Turkey Cooperation in the Field of Migration, Brussels, 16. 3.2016.
  • Council Decision Concerning the Conclusion of the Agreement Between the European Union and Republic of Turkey on the Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorization, COM (2012) 239 Final, Brussels, 22.06.2012.
  • European Commission, Roadmap towards a Visa- Free Regime with Turkey. Internet access 20.03.2014, http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-is-new/news/news/docs/20131216-roadmap_towards_the_ visafree_regime_with_turkey_en.pdf?utm_source=Weekly+Legal+Update&utm_campaign=fdb688b29cWLU_20_12_2013&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_7176f0fc3d-fdb688b29c-419648261
  • First Meeting of the EU- Turkey Visa Liberalization Dialogue Agreed Minutes, Article. 2, 4. (Access Date: 18.03.2014), http://www.mfa.gov. tr/data/agreed%20minutes%20ve%20annotated%20roadmap.pdf.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Pelin Sönmez

Hikmet Kırık

Publication Date April 27, 2017
Submission Date March 24, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 13 Issue: 25

Cite

Chicago Sönmez, Pelin, and Hikmet Kırık. “Türkiye-AB Geri Kabul Anlaşması: AB-Türkiye Göç Diyalogu Üzerine Bir Eleştiri (İngilizce Makale)”. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi 13, no. 25 (April 2017): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.309396.