NATO'nun Yeni Ortaklık Politikası Çerçevesinde “Küresel Ortaklar” ile İlişkileri

Year 2014, Volume: 10 Issue: 20, 49 - 84, 01.08.2014

Arif Bağbaşlıoğlu

Abstract

The aim of this article is to discuss all aspects of NATO’s approach to global partners, as well as how the Alliance’s new partnership policy can affect relations with these countries. This article examines the implications of the change in US foreign policy for NATO and it asserts that the impact of the financial crisis on defence budgets of NATO member states and the shifting American strategic focus to the Asia Pacific region will also force NATO to focus on finding new global partners from this region where there is no possibility for Alliance expansion in the short to medium term. Clearly, in an age of austerity, and with its new partnership policy, NATO aims to focus more on developing its relations with global partners

Keywords

-

Relations With “Global Partners” in the Framework of NATO's New Partnership Policy

Abstract

Bu makalenin amacı, NATO’nun küresel ortaklar ile geliştirdiği ilişkileri ve İttifak’ın yeni ortaklık politikasının söz konusu ilişkileri nasıl etkileyeceğini tüm yönleriyle tartışmaktır. Makale ABD dış politikasındaki değişimlerin NATO’nun ortaklık politikasına yönelik yansımalarını ele almaktadır ve NATO’nun yeni ortaklık politikasının dünyanın çeşitli bölgelerinde ve özellikle İttifak’ın kısa vadede genişleme imkânının olmadığı Asya Pasifik Bölgesi’nde yeni küresel ortaklar yaratacağı iddiasındadır. ABD’nin stratejik önceliklerini Asya Pasifik Bölgesi’ne kaydırması, NATO’nun bu bölgeden küresel ortaklar bulmasını sağlayacaktır. Makalede bu süreç Transatlantik ilişkilerin bir ayrışmadan ziyade bir değişim süreci içerisinde olduğunun kanıtı olarak değerlendirilmektedir

Keywords

NATO, NATO’nun Ortaklık Politikası

References

• Books
• HOOK, Glen D., Julie Gilson, Christopher W. Hughes and Hugo Dobson, Japan’s International Relations Politics, Economics and Security., Third Ed. Routhledge, Wiltshire, 2012.
• KAY, Sean, “Partnerships and Power in American Grand Strategy”, NATO: The Power of the Partnerships, Eds. Hakan Edström, Janne Haaland Matlary ve Magnus Petersson, Palgrave, Hampshire, 2011.
• KRAMER, Franklin D., NATO Global Partnerships: Strategic Opportunities and Imperatives in a Globalized World, Atlantic Council, Washington.
• MOORE, Rebecca R., “Partnership Goes Global: The Role of Nonmember, Non-European Union States in the Evolution of NATO”, NATO in Search of a Vision, eds. Gülnur Aybet and Rebecca Moore. Georgetown University Press, Washington, 2010.
• OĞUZLU, Tarık, NATO Ortaklıkları ve Türkiye: Barış İçin Ortaklık, Akdeniz Diyaloğu, İstanbul İşbirliği Girişimi, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 2013
• SCHREER, Benjamin, “The Evolution of NATO’s Strategy in Afghanistan” Pursuing Streategy: NATO Operations from the Gulf War to Gaddafi, eds. Hakan Edström and Dennis Gyllensporre. Palgrave, Hampshire, 2012.
• Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), SIPRI Yearbook 2012: Armaments, Disarmaments and International Security, Summary. Solna: SIPRI, 2012. Papers
• ASMUS, Ron, “Rethinking NATO Partnerships for the 21st Century”. NATO Review, 2008 http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2008/03/ART4/ EN/index.htm, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• BAĞBAŞLIOĞLU, Arif, “Beyond Afghanistan NATO’s Partnership with Central Asia and South Caucasus: A Tangled Partnership?”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2014, Vol. 5 No.1 http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1879366513000274, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• BOZGENAU, Cristina (2012). ““Pooling and Sharing” and “Smart
• Defence” Beyond the Concept”, Paper presented in the International
• Scientific Conference with the theme Complex and Dynamic Nature of
• the Security Environment, 22-23 November 2012, Bucharest: Carol I
• National Defence University, 2012.
• DAALDER, Ivo ve James Goldgeier, “Global NATO”, Foreign
• Affairs, 2006, Vol. 85, No.5.
• GHECIU, Alexandra, “In Search of Smart Defense in the Euro
• Atlantic Area”, CIPS Policy Brief, 2012, No 20, http://cips.uottawa.
• ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/CIPS_PolicyBrief_Gheciu_Sept 2012.pdf, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• GIEGERICH, Bastian, “NATO’s Smart Defence: Who’s Buying?”.
• Survival, 2012, Vol. 54, No. 3.
• KAMP, Karl-Heinz, “‘Global Partnership’ A New Conflict Within
• NATO?”, Analysis and Arguments, no 29/ 2006 Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
• MALMVIG, Helle, “From a Diplomatic Talking Shop to a Powerful
• Partnership? NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue and the Democratisation
• of the Middle East”, DIIS Brief, Copenhagen: DIIS, 2004.
• MARRONE, Alessandro, “The Equilibrium of the 2010 NATO
• Strategic Concept”, The International Spectator, 2011, Vol. 46, No. 3.
• MOORE, Rebecca R., “Lisbon and the Evolution of NATO’s New
• Partnership Policy”, Perceptions, 2012, Vol. 17, No. 1.
• RASMUSSEN, Anders Fogh, “NATO After Libya”, Foreign Affairs,
• 2011, Vol. 90, No. 4.
• REISINGER, Heidi, Rearranging Family Life and a Large Circle of
• Friends: Reforming NATO’s Partnership Programmes, Research
• Paper No:72, Rome: NATO Defense College, 2012.
• SCHREER, Benjamin, Beyond Afghanistan: NATO’s Global
• Partnerships in the Asia-Pacific, Research Paper No: 75. Rome:
• NATO Defense College, 2012.
• TANNER, Fred, Is NATO Going Global?, GCSP Policy Brief No. 14,
• Geneva: Geneva Center for Security Policy, 2007.
• WEBBER, Mark, “NATO: The United States, Transformation and the War in Afghanistan”, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 11, No. 1.
• Dailies and Periodicals
• HEISBOURG, François, “Why NATO Needs To Be Less Ambitious”, Financial Times, 22.11.2006, http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/3a657 376-7a01-11db-8d70-0000779e2340.html#axzz2Mn2OzlJT, date: 20.02.2014).
• HIROSE, Yoshikazu, “The Prospects of Japan-NATO Cooperation”, World Security Network, 08.06.2010, http://www.worldsecurity network.com/NATO-Japan/Hirose-Yoshikazu/The-Prospects-of-Japan- NATO-Cooperation, (Access date: 20.02.2014). Internet
• European Defense Agency “Defense Data 2011”, http://www.eda. europa.eu/info-hub/news/2013/07/22/defence-data-2011, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• ISAF, ISAF: Key Facts and Figures, 19 February 2013, http://www.nato.int/isaf/docu/epub/pdf/placemat.pdf, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• NATO, NATO 2020: Assured Security; Dynamic Engagement- Analysis and Recommendations of the Group of Experts on a New Strategic Concept for NATO, Brusselss: Public Diplomacy Division, http://www.nato.int/strategic-concept/expertsreport.pdf, (Access date: 20.02.2014). NATO,
• http://www.nato.int/cps/en/SID-DB81B0BC-339C89C0/natolive/topic s_79430.htm, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• NATO, Political Military Framework For Partner Involvement In NATO-Led
• nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2011_04/20110415_110415-PMF.pdf,
• (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• NATO, “NATO-Republic Korea Cooperation”, http://www.nato.int/ cps/en/SID-4143343E-C27FB0F4/natolive/topics_50098.htm, (Access date: 20.02.2014). (Access “Political and Partnerships Committee
• (PPC)”, Operations, 15 April 2011
• http://www.nato.int/ NATO, “Partnerships: A Cooperative Approach to Security”,
• http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_84336.htm, (Access date: 20.02.2014). NATO,
• topics_84268.htm, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• NATO Parliamentary Assembly, “Contributions of Non-NATO
• Members to NATO Operations,” Report by Sverre Myrli, Sub
• Committee on Future Security and Defence Capabilities, Defence and
• Security Committee, 15 November 2008,(159 DSCFC 08 E rev.1).
• http://www.nato-pa.int/Default.asp?SHORTCUT=1475, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• NAC, Comprehensive Political Guidance, 2006 http://www.nato.int/
• cps/en/SID-BE7F4F92-5E137DFF/natolive/official_texts_56425.htm,
• (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• NAC, “Bucharest Summit Declaration”, http://www.nato.int/cps/
• en/natolive/official_texts_8443.htm?selectedLocale=en, 20.02.2014.
• NAC, Active Engagement, Modern Defence: Strategic Concept,
• http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_68580.htm, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• RASMUSSEN, Anders Fogh, “Building Security in an Age of
• Austerity”. Keynote speech at the 4 February 2011 Munich Security
• Conference http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/opinions_70400.htm,
• (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• SCHRIVER, Randall and Tiffany Ma, The Next Steps in Japan- NATO
• http://project2049.net/documents/next_steps_in_japan_nato_cooperati
• on_schriver_ma.pdf, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• The White House, Remarks by President Obama to the Australian Parliament,
• http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/17/remarks- president-obama-australian-parliament, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• TSURUOKA, Michito (2012). “NATO and Japan: View from Tokyo”.
• RUSI Journal, 2012, Vol. 156, No. 6. 2049 Institute, 2010, Canberra, November 17, 2011,
• US DOD, “Secretary Rumsfeld Briefs at the Foreign Press Center”. http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=1330,
• (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• US DOD, Quadrennial Defense Review, 6 February 2006, Washington: US Department of Defense http://www.defense.gov/qdr/ report/report20060203.pdf (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• US DOD, Sustaining US Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense, 2012, US Department of Defense, Washington http://www.whatthefolly.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Defense_
• Strategic_Guidance.pdf, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
• US Department of Defense Missile Defense Agency, “International Cooperation”. http://www.mda.mil/system/international_cooperation.html, (Access date: 20.02.2014).