BibTex RIS Cite

Hukukun İktisadi Analizi Çerçevesinde Rekabet Hukuku

Year 2014, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 35 - 54, 01.06.2014

Zeynep Ayata

Abstract

Hukukun iktisadi analizi, hukuk kuralları ve kurumlarının değerlendirilmesinde mikro iktisat araçlarını kullanan disiplinlerarası bir yaklaşımdır. Bu analizin temel amacı, “toplam iktisadi etkinlik”
olarak tanımlanan sosyal refahın artırılmasıdır. Bu analiz, hukukun farklı alanlarında kullanılan bir
yaklaşım olmakla birlikte, bilhassa Amerika Birleşik Devletleri rekabet hukukunda önemli bir etki yaratmıştır. Hukukun iktisadi analizinin, Avrupa Birliği rekabet hukukunda da uygulanmasına yönelik
olarak literatürde ve politika geliştiren Komisyon’da tartışmalar yapılmaktadır. Bu makalede, öncelikle, hukukun iktisadi analizinin iktisadi ve hukuki temelleri incelenecektir. Daha sonra, bu analizin Amerika Birleşik Devletleri rekabet hukukunda, özellikle refah ekonomileri ve Chicago Okulu’nun etkisiyle
uygulanışı ele alınacaktır. Son bölümde ise, bu analizin Avrupa Birliği rekabet hukuku ve politikasıyla
uyumu tartışılacaktır.

Keywords

Hukukun iktisadi analizi refah ekonomileri iktisadi etkinlik rekabet hukuku tüketici refahı

References

  • AHLBORN, C. / PADILLA, J. “From Fairness to Welfare: Implications for the assessment of unilateral conduct under EC Competition Law” 12nd Annual Competition Law and Policy Workshop (pp. 1-42). Florence, European, University Institute, 2007
  • ASLAN, Yılmaz, Rekabet Hukuku Dersleri, Ekin Kitabevi, 2010
  • BENNETT, M. / FINGLETON, J. / FLETCHER, A. / HURLEY, L. / RUCK, D. “What does Behavioral Economics Mean for Competition Policy?” Competition Policy International, 2010, 6 (1), s. 111-137.
  • BENTHAM, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, 1907, Oxford Clarendon Press
  • BİLGİLİ, Yüksel, Mikro İktisat Ders Notları. İstanbul, İkinci Sayfa, 2013
  • BOADWAY, R. / BRUCE, N. Welfare Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984
  • BORK, Robert H., The Antitrust Paradox, A Policy at War with Itself, New York, Basic Books Inc. Publisher, 1978
  • BUTTIGIEG, Eugene, Competition Law: Safeguarding the Consumer Interest: A Comparative
  • Analysis of US Antitrust Law and EC Competition Law. The Netherlands, Wolters Kluwer, 2009
  • CINI, M., / MCGOWAN, L., The Competition Policy in the European Union, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008
  • COOTER, Robert B. Jr. / ULEN, Thomas, Law and Economics, 2011, Pearson, Edinbrugh
  • Economic Advisory Group for Competition Policy, An Economic Approach to Article 82, Brussels, European Commission, 2005
  • ETRO, Frederic, “Competition Policy: Toward a New Approach”, European Competition Journal, 2 (1), s. 29-55, 2006
  • EUCKEN, W. “The Competitive Order and Its Implementation” (English Translation). Competition Policy International, 2(2), 1-99, 2006
  • EVANS, David, “The Known Knowns and the Known Unkowns” Consumer Policy Review, 17(2), 48-51, 2007
  • GERBER, David J., Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus. New York, Oxford University Press, 1998
  • GERBER, David J. “Two Forms of Modernization in European Competition Law” Fordham International Law Journal, 31, 1235-1265, 2008
  • GERBER, David J, Global Competition, Law, Markets and Globalization, New York, Oxford University Press, 2010
  • GÜRKAYNAK, Gönenç, Türk Rekabet Hukuku Uygulaması için “Hukuk ve İktisat” Perspektifinden
  • “Amaç” Tartışması. Ankara, Rekabet Kurumu, 2003
  • HARNAY, Sophie / MARCIANO, Alain, “Posner, economics and the law: From “law and economics” to an economic analysis of law”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2009, V: 31, No:2
  • HOVENKAMP, Herbert. J. The Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2005
  • JOHANSSON, P.-O., An Introduction to Welfare Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991
  • KOVACIC, W., / SHAPIRO, C, “Antitrust Policy: A Centruy of Economic Legal and Legal Thinking” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), s. 43-60, 2000
  • KROES, Nellie “Competition Policy: Achievements in 2006; Work Programme in 2007; Priorities for 2008 (SPEECH/07/425)”, Brussels, European Parliament Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, 2007
  • KROES, Nellie, “The Place of Competition Law in the Future Community Legal Order” (SPEECH/07/689).
  • A Renewed Commitment to Competition Policy in Europe (s. 2-5). Brussels: The Global Competition Law Centre, The Institut Montaigne, 2007
  • LANDE, Robert, H. “The Rise and (Coming) Fall of Efficiency as the Ruler of Antitrust”, Antitrust Bulletin, 33, 429-465, 1988
  • MONTI, Mario, “The Future for Competition Policy in the Europan Union” Speech at Merchant Taylor’s Hall, 2001
  • MONTI, Mairo, “Merger Control in the European Union: A Radical Reform, Speech at the European Union Commission IBA on EU Merger Control” Brussels, 2002
  • MONTI, Mario, “EU Competition Law from Rome to Lisbon–Social Market Economy” C. Heide-Jİrgensen, C. Bergqvist, U. Neergaard, & S. T. Poulsen, Aims and Values in Competition Law (s. 13-52). Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 2013
  • MOTTA, M. Competition Policy: Theory and Practice, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2004
  • PEREZ, S. M., / SCHEUR, S., “The Evolution of the Law on Articles 85 and 86 EEC (Articles 101 and 102 TFEU) Ordo-liberalism and its Keynesian Challenge”. In PATEL / SCHWEITZER, The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law (s. 19-53). New York, Oxford University Press, 2013
  • POSNER, Richard A., Antitrust Law, Chicago, London, The University of Chicago Press, 2001
  • POSNER, Richard, Economic Analysis of Law, 8. Basım, Kluwer, Law, New York, 2011
  • PRIEST, G. L., “The Limits of Antitrust and the Chicago School Tradition”. I. Lianos, & D. D. Sokol, The Global Limits of Competition Law içinde (pp. 15-21). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. 2012
  • SAGERS, C. L, Antitrust: Examples and Explanations. New York, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2011
  • SALOP, S. C. Question: What is the Real and Proper Antitrust Welfare Standard? Answer: The True Consumer Welfare Standard. Retrieved from Social Science Research Network: http://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1491302, Kasım 2005, siteye erişim tarihi 19 Mayıs 2014
  • SHAVELL, Steven, Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law, Harvard University Press, 2004
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Economic Analysis of Law, 2011 http://plato.stanford.edu/ entries/legal-econanalysis/ , siteye erişim tarihi 19 Mayıs 2014
  • VAN OVERTVELDT, Johan, The Chicago School: How the University of Chicago Assembled the Thinkers who Revolutionized Economics and Business, Agate, Chicago, 2007, s. 291
  • WEITBRECHT, A., “From Freiburg to Chicago and Beyond–The First 50 Years of European Competition Law”, European Competition Law Review, 2, s. 81-88. 2008 K A R A R L A R
  • Airtours plc v. Commission, Case T-342/99 ECR II-2585 5 CMLR, 2002
  • Bertelsmann AG and Sony Corporation of America v. IMPALA, Case C-413/06P, ECR I-4951 5 CMLR 17, 2008
  • Continental T. V. Inc v. GTE Sylvania, 433 US 36, 1977
  • Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. 220 U.S. 373, 1919
  • GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v. Commission, Case C-501-06P, ECR I-9291 4 CMLR 2 October 6, 2009
  • Kathleen R. Reiter v. Sonotone Corporation, 442 US 330, 1979
  • Konkurrensverket v. TeliaSonera Sverige AB, Case C-52/09, 4 CMLR 18, 2011
  • Leegin Creative Leather Products , Inc v. PSKS, Inc dba Kay’s Kloset Kay’s Shoes, No. 06-480 551 US 877, 168 L. Ed.2d 623, 2007
  • Ryanair Holdings plc v. Commission T-342/07, 4 CMLR 4, 2011
  • Schneider Electric v Commission Case T-310/01, 2002
  • State Oil Co. v. Khan, 522 US 3, 1997
  • Tetra Laval v Commission Case T-5/02 ECR-II-4381, 2002
  • United States v. Philadelphia National Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 1963

THE COMPETITION LAW WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Year 2014, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 35 - 54, 01.06.2014

Zeynep Ayata

Abstract

The economic analysis of law is an approach which applies the methods of microeconomics to the
analysis of legal rules and institutions. The main purpose of this analysis is to maximise social
welfare which is defined as total economic efficiency. This analysis has been widely used in United
States Antitrust Law. There are ongoing debates as whether this approach should also be applied in
European Union competition law. This article examines the economic analysis of law and its impact on
United States Antitrust enforcement through the influence of welfare economics and Chicago School.
It then discusses whether it should also be enforced in European Union competition law.

Keywords

Economic analysis of law welfare economics economic efficiency competition law consumer welfare

References

  • AHLBORN, C. / PADILLA, J. “From Fairness to Welfare: Implications for the assessment of unilateral conduct under EC Competition Law” 12nd Annual Competition Law and Policy Workshop (pp. 1-42). Florence, European, University Institute, 2007
  • ASLAN, Yılmaz, Rekabet Hukuku Dersleri, Ekin Kitabevi, 2010
  • BENNETT, M. / FINGLETON, J. / FLETCHER, A. / HURLEY, L. / RUCK, D. “What does Behavioral Economics Mean for Competition Policy?” Competition Policy International, 2010, 6 (1), s. 111-137.
  • BENTHAM, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, 1907, Oxford Clarendon Press
  • BİLGİLİ, Yüksel, Mikro İktisat Ders Notları. İstanbul, İkinci Sayfa, 2013
  • BOADWAY, R. / BRUCE, N. Welfare Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984
  • BORK, Robert H., The Antitrust Paradox, A Policy at War with Itself, New York, Basic Books Inc. Publisher, 1978
  • BUTTIGIEG, Eugene, Competition Law: Safeguarding the Consumer Interest: A Comparative
  • Analysis of US Antitrust Law and EC Competition Law. The Netherlands, Wolters Kluwer, 2009
  • CINI, M., / MCGOWAN, L., The Competition Policy in the European Union, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008
  • COOTER, Robert B. Jr. / ULEN, Thomas, Law and Economics, 2011, Pearson, Edinbrugh
  • Economic Advisory Group for Competition Policy, An Economic Approach to Article 82, Brussels, European Commission, 2005
  • ETRO, Frederic, “Competition Policy: Toward a New Approach”, European Competition Journal, 2 (1), s. 29-55, 2006
  • EUCKEN, W. “The Competitive Order and Its Implementation” (English Translation). Competition Policy International, 2(2), 1-99, 2006
  • EVANS, David, “The Known Knowns and the Known Unkowns” Consumer Policy Review, 17(2), 48-51, 2007
  • GERBER, David J., Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus. New York, Oxford University Press, 1998
  • GERBER, David J. “Two Forms of Modernization in European Competition Law” Fordham International Law Journal, 31, 1235-1265, 2008
  • GERBER, David J, Global Competition, Law, Markets and Globalization, New York, Oxford University Press, 2010
  • GÜRKAYNAK, Gönenç, Türk Rekabet Hukuku Uygulaması için “Hukuk ve İktisat” Perspektifinden
  • “Amaç” Tartışması. Ankara, Rekabet Kurumu, 2003
  • HARNAY, Sophie / MARCIANO, Alain, “Posner, economics and the law: From “law and economics” to an economic analysis of law”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2009, V: 31, No:2
  • HOVENKAMP, Herbert. J. The Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2005
  • JOHANSSON, P.-O., An Introduction to Welfare Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991
  • KOVACIC, W., / SHAPIRO, C, “Antitrust Policy: A Centruy of Economic Legal and Legal Thinking” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), s. 43-60, 2000
  • KROES, Nellie “Competition Policy: Achievements in 2006; Work Programme in 2007; Priorities for 2008 (SPEECH/07/425)”, Brussels, European Parliament Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, 2007
  • KROES, Nellie, “The Place of Competition Law in the Future Community Legal Order” (SPEECH/07/689).
  • A Renewed Commitment to Competition Policy in Europe (s. 2-5). Brussels: The Global Competition Law Centre, The Institut Montaigne, 2007
  • LANDE, Robert, H. “The Rise and (Coming) Fall of Efficiency as the Ruler of Antitrust”, Antitrust Bulletin, 33, 429-465, 1988
  • MONTI, Mario, “The Future for Competition Policy in the Europan Union” Speech at Merchant Taylor’s Hall, 2001
  • MONTI, Mairo, “Merger Control in the European Union: A Radical Reform, Speech at the European Union Commission IBA on EU Merger Control” Brussels, 2002
  • MONTI, Mario, “EU Competition Law from Rome to Lisbon–Social Market Economy” C. Heide-Jİrgensen, C. Bergqvist, U. Neergaard, & S. T. Poulsen, Aims and Values in Competition Law (s. 13-52). Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 2013
  • MOTTA, M. Competition Policy: Theory and Practice, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2004
  • PEREZ, S. M., / SCHEUR, S., “The Evolution of the Law on Articles 85 and 86 EEC (Articles 101 and 102 TFEU) Ordo-liberalism and its Keynesian Challenge”. In PATEL / SCHWEITZER, The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law (s. 19-53). New York, Oxford University Press, 2013
  • POSNER, Richard A., Antitrust Law, Chicago, London, The University of Chicago Press, 2001
  • POSNER, Richard, Economic Analysis of Law, 8. Basım, Kluwer, Law, New York, 2011
  • PRIEST, G. L., “The Limits of Antitrust and the Chicago School Tradition”. I. Lianos, & D. D. Sokol, The Global Limits of Competition Law içinde (pp. 15-21). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. 2012
  • SAGERS, C. L, Antitrust: Examples and Explanations. New York, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2011
  • SALOP, S. C. Question: What is the Real and Proper Antitrust Welfare Standard? Answer: The True Consumer Welfare Standard. Retrieved from Social Science Research Network: http://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1491302, Kasım 2005, siteye erişim tarihi 19 Mayıs 2014
  • SHAVELL, Steven, Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law, Harvard University Press, 2004
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Economic Analysis of Law, 2011 http://plato.stanford.edu/ entries/legal-econanalysis/ , siteye erişim tarihi 19 Mayıs 2014
  • VAN OVERTVELDT, Johan, The Chicago School: How the University of Chicago Assembled the Thinkers who Revolutionized Economics and Business, Agate, Chicago, 2007, s. 291
  • WEITBRECHT, A., “From Freiburg to Chicago and Beyond–The First 50 Years of European Competition Law”, European Competition Law Review, 2, s. 81-88. 2008 K A R A R L A R
  • Airtours plc v. Commission, Case T-342/99 ECR II-2585 5 CMLR, 2002
  • Bertelsmann AG and Sony Corporation of America v. IMPALA, Case C-413/06P, ECR I-4951 5 CMLR 17, 2008
  • Continental T. V. Inc v. GTE Sylvania, 433 US 36, 1977
  • Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. 220 U.S. 373, 1919
  • GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v. Commission, Case C-501-06P, ECR I-9291 4 CMLR 2 October 6, 2009
  • Kathleen R. Reiter v. Sonotone Corporation, 442 US 330, 1979
  • Konkurrensverket v. TeliaSonera Sverige AB, Case C-52/09, 4 CMLR 18, 2011
  • Leegin Creative Leather Products , Inc v. PSKS, Inc dba Kay’s Kloset Kay’s Shoes, No. 06-480 551 US 877, 168 L. Ed.2d 623, 2007
  • Ryanair Holdings plc v. Commission T-342/07, 4 CMLR 4, 2011
  • Schneider Electric v Commission Case T-310/01, 2002
  • State Oil Co. v. Khan, 522 US 3, 1997
  • Tetra Laval v Commission Case T-5/02 ECR-II-4381, 2002
  • United States v. Philadelphia National Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 1963
There are 55 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA89UK87MP
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Zeynep Ayata This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 4 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Ayata, Z. (2014). Hukukun İktisadi Analizi Çerçevesinde Rekabet Hukuku. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 35-54.
AMA Ayata Z. Hukukun İktisadi Analizi Çerçevesinde Rekabet Hukuku. HHFD. June 2014;4(1):35-54.
Chicago Ayata, Zeynep. “Hukukun İktisadi Analizi Çerçevesinde Rekabet Hukuku”. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 4, no. 1 (June 2014): 35-54.
EndNote Ayata Z (June 1, 2014) Hukukun İktisadi Analizi Çerçevesinde Rekabet Hukuku. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 4 1 35–54.
IEEE Z. Ayata, “Hukukun İktisadi Analizi Çerçevesinde Rekabet Hukuku”, HHFD, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 35–54, 2014.
ISNAD Ayata, Zeynep. “Hukukun İktisadi Analizi Çerçevesinde Rekabet Hukuku”. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 4/1 (June 2014), 35-54.
JAMA Ayata Z. Hukukun İktisadi Analizi Çerçevesinde Rekabet Hukuku. HHFD. 2014;4:35–54.
MLA Ayata, Zeynep. “Hukukun İktisadi Analizi Çerçevesinde Rekabet Hukuku”. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 4, no. 1, 2014, pp. 35-54.
Vancouver Ayata Z. Hukukun İktisadi Analizi Çerçevesinde Rekabet Hukuku. HHFD. 2014;4(1):35-54.