Ormanlara İlişkin Küresel Bir Antlaşmanın Yokluğunda Uluslararası Hukukta Ormanların Korunması

Year 2014, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 47 - 76, 01.12.2014

Meltem Saribeyoğlu Skalar

Abstract

Ormanlarla ilgili uluslararası düzenlemeler için çabalar Rio Konferansından bugüne devam etmektedir. Bu makalede, ormanlara ilişkin uluslararası hukukun gelişimi incelenmektedir. Bu kapsamda, Rio Konferansından bugüne ormanların korunması için gerçekleştirilen esnek hukuk belgeleri ele alınmıştır ve bu bağlayıcı olmayan hukuk kurallarının uluslararası hukukta ormanların korunması açısından önemli bir ilerleme teşkil ettiği sonucuna varılmıştır. Konusu ormanları korumak olmamakla beraber yerine getirilmesi, ormanların korunmasını da gerektiren çeşitli uluslararası antlaşmalar da incelenmiştir ve küresel bir antlaşma bulunmamakla beraber ormanların korunması açısından uluslararası hukukun her tür araçtan yoksun olmadığı görülmüştür. Uluslararası örf ve adet hukuku altında, doğal kaynaklar üzerinde sürekli devlet egemenliği ilkesinin, ormanların uluslararası korunmasını engelleyip engellemediği incelenmiş ve devlet egemenliğinin, ormanların işletilmesi konusunda, sınırsız olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

Keywords

Ormanların korunması, doğal kaynaklar, egemenlik, iklim değişikliği, uluslararası çevre hukuku

Protection of Forests in International Law in the Absence of a Global Treaty

Abstract

on ForestsC ontinuous effort has been made for regulating forests internationally since the Rio Conference. In this paper, the development of international law on forests is examined. For this purpose, first, the soft law instruments are taken into consideration and it is concluded that these non-binding instruments represent a significant improvement in the area of international forest law. Besides nonbinding rules and instruments, various relevant treaties that require an international protection of forests, although indirectly, are also examined. It is observed that international law is not deprived of all means for the protection of forests and in the absence of a global treaty on forests, there are still other tools in international law. Lastly, the paper examines whether or not the well established principle of customary international law that allows permanent sovereignty over natural resources can hinder the internationalisation of forests and it is concluded that state sovereignty is not unlimited in use and exploitation of forests

Keywords

Protection of forests, natural resources, sovereignty, climate change, international environmental law

References

• ARCURI, Alessandra, “Back to the Future: US-Tuna II and the New Environment-Trade Debate”, European Journal of Risk Regulation, May 2012, Vol. 3 Issue 2, (s. 177-189).
• BIRNIE, Patricia / BOYLE, Alan / REDGWELL, Catherine, International Law and the Environment, 3rd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009.
• DENK, Erdem, “Bir Kitle İmha Silahı Olarak Nükleer Silahların Yasaklanmasına Yönelik Çabalar”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt 66, No. 3, 2011, (s. 93-136).
• DESAI, Bharat H., “Forests, International Protection”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, (der. , R. Wolfrum), March 2011, http://www.sai.uni-heidelberg.de/sapol/pdf/Forests.pdf. (erişim tarihi 07.11.2014)
• DURU, Bülent, “Dünya Bankası, GEF ve Küresel Çevre Sorunları”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 58-2, (s. 79-95).
• FRENCH, Duncan A., “A reappraisal of sovereignty in the light of global environmental concerns”, Legal Studies, Vol. 21, Issue 3, 2001, (s. 376–399).
• GARDNER, Royal C., “Respecting Sovereignty”, Fordham Environmental Law Journal, Vol. VIII, 1996, (s. 133-138).
• GURUSWAMY, Lakshman, “Environment and Trade: Competing Paradigms in International Law”, Legal Visions of the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Judge Christopher Weeramantry, (der. Antony
• Anghie ve Garry Sturgess), Kluwer Law International, The Hague/London, 1998, (s. 543-576).
• GÜNDÜZ, Aslan, Milletlerarası Hukuk, (der. Reşat Volkan Günel), 6. Baskı, Beta, İstanbul, 2013, s. 404.
• GÜNEŞ, Şule Anlar, “Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Davası”, AÜHFD, C. 55, Sa. 2, 2006, (s. 91-116).
• HOOKER, Ann, “The International Law of Forests”, Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 34, Fall 1994, (s. 823-877).
• KOVIC DINE, Masa, “Forests: Does State Sovereignty Hinder Their Protection at the International Level”, International Environmental Law: Contemporary Concerns and Challenges, (der. Vasilka Sancin), GV Zalozba, Ljubljana, 2012, (s. 109-128).
• KUNZMANN, Katharina, “The Non-legally Binding Instrument on Sustainable Management of All Types of Forests–Towards a Legal Regime for Sustainable Forest Management?”, German Law Journal, Vol. 09, No. 08, 2008, (s. 981-1005).
• MCDERMOTT, Constance L. / O’CARROLL, Aran / WOOD, Peter, International Forest Policy – the instruments, agreements and processes that shape it, Department of Economic and Social
• Affairs United Nations Forum on Forests Secretariat, Haziran 2007,
• NOLLKAEMPER, Andre, “Protecting Forests through Trade Measures: The Search for Substantive Benchmarks”, The Georgetown Int’l Envtl. Law Review, Vol. 8, 1996, (s. 389-421).
• OPPENHEIM, Lassa, International Law A Treatise, Vol. I, 2nd Ed., Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1912.
• ÖKTEM, Emre, Uluslararası Teamül Hukuku, Beta, İstanbul, 2013.
• PALLEMAERTS, Marc, “Stockholm’den Rio’ya Uluslararası Çevre Hukuku: Geleceğe Doğru Geri Adım Mı?”, A.Ü.Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi (Prof.Dr.Cemal Mıhçıoğlu’na Armağan), (Çev: Bülent Duru), C.52, Ocak-Aralık 1997, (s. 613-632).
• PARDAVE, Guillermo, “REDD Alert for Developing Countries? Are Their Forests in Risk of Internationalisation with the Recent Developments within the UN Climate Change Regime?”,
• Agenda Internacional, XVIII, No 29, 2011, (s. 213-246).
• PAZARCI, Hüseyin, Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri II. Kitap, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Yayınları, Ankara, 1989.
• PERREZ, Franz Xaver, “The Effıciency of Cooperation: A Functional Analysis of Sovereignty”, Arizona
• Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1998, (s. 515-582).
• PERREZ, Franz Xaver, “The Relationship Between “Permanent Sovereignty” and the Obligation not to Cause Transboundary Environmental Damages”, Environmental Law, Vol. 26, 1996, (1187-1212).
• RUIS, Barbara M.G.S., No forest convention but ten tree treaties, http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/ y1237e/y1237e03.htm (erişim tarihi 07.11.2014).
• SANDS, Philippe / PEEL, Jacqueline / FABRA, Adriana vd., Principles of International Environmental Law, Third Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
• SCHNEIDER, Thomas W., A non-legally-binding Instrument as an Alternative to a Forest Convention, Work Report of the Institute for World Forestry 2006/4, Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products, Hamburg, 2006, http://literatur.ti.bund.de/digbib_extern/dk039296.pdf. (erişim tarihi 07.11.2014)
• SCHREUER, Christoph “The Waning of the Sovereign State: Towards a New Paradigm for International- Law?”, EJIL, 4, 1993, (447-471).
• SCHRIJVER, Nico J., “The Evolution of Sustainable Development in International Law: Inception, Meaning and Status”, Recueil Des Cours, 329, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/Boston, 2008, (221-412).
• SOHN, Louis B., “The Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment”, The Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 14, Nu. 3, Summer 1973, (s. 423-515).
• STEINER, Melanie “After a Decade of Global Forest Negotiations, Where Are We Now?”, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, Vol. 10, Issue 1, April 2001, (s. 98–105).
• STEINER, Melanie, “The Journey From Rio to Johannesburg: Ten Years of Forest Negotiations, Ten Years of Successes and Failures”, Golden Gate University Law Review, Vol. 32: 4, 2002, (s. 629- 664).
• TAKACS, David, “Forest Carbon (REDD+), Repairing International Trust, and Reciprocal Contractual Sovereignty”, Vermont Law Review, Vol. 37, 2013, (s. 653-736).
• TURGUT, Nükhet, Çevre Hukuku, 2.bası, Savaş, Ankara, 2001.
• TÜTÜNCÜ, Ayşe Nur, “Trail Smelter Hakem Kararı Hukukun Kodlaştırılmasında Örnek Olay Olarak Etkisi ve Kararın Özeti”, İHFM, C: LV, Sayı 4, 1997, (s. 313-338).