Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Health Information Technology in Nursing: Views and Attitudes of Nurse Managers

Year 2017, Volume: 20 Issue: 4, 409 - 427, 29.12.2017

Abstract

Aim of this study was to determine nurse managers’ views and attitudes towards health information technology. The study was planned as a mixed methods study. Sample of the study consisted of 52 nurse managers. Participants were selected from the nurse managers working at training and research hospitals of a university in Turkey. Content analysis was used for data obtained from face-to-face interviews, and data obtained from other data collection tools were analyzed by frequency, percentage distributions, means, and standard deviations. According to the results obtained from the study; respondents noted strengths of health information technology, such as easing workflow and minimizing medication errors through better documentation. Perceived weaknesses included long waits to obtain patients’ medications when the system was busy, and time lost entering information into the system. Mean score for attitudes about health information technology was 4.90 (±0.90) out of 7. Nurse managers experienced difficulties with learning and perceptions about the system, teaching a new system to team members, and adapting when a new system replaced the old one.

References

  • 1. Alquraini H., Alhashem A. M., Shah M. A. and Chowdhury R. I. (2007) Factors Influencing Nurses’ Attitudes Towards The Use of Computerized Health Information Systems in Kuwaiti Hospitals. Journal of Advanced Nursing 57(4): 375-81. 2. Ammenwerth E., Gräber S., Herrmann G., Bürkle T. and König C. (2003) Evaluation of Health Information Systems—Problems and Challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics 71(2): 125-135. 3. Bilgiç Ş. and Şendir M. (2014) Nursing Informatics. Cumhuriyet Nursing Journal 3(1): 24-28. 4. Buntin M. B., Burke M. F., Hoaglin M. C. and Blumenthal D. (2011) The Benefits of Health Information Technology: A Review of The Recent Literature Shows Predominantly Positive Results. Health Affairs 30(3): 464-471. 5. Cipriano P. F., Dailey M., Dykes P. and Lamb G. (2013) The Importance of Health Information Technology in Care Coordination and Transitional Care. Nursing Outlook 62(6): 475-489. 6. Erdemir F., Hanoğlu Z. and Akman A. (2015) Computer and Internet Use of Nurses, and Their Opinion About the Value of Use of Computers in Nursing. 17-20. Retrieved from: http://www.turkmia.org/kongre/cd/pdf/16.pdf. 7. Hikmet N., Davis C. and Hockett K. (2006) Uncovering The Antecedents For Measuring The Nursing's Contribution to Quality of Care Provided to Patients: Role of Health Information Technology on The Care Coordination. Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems, August 04th-06th 2006, Acapulco, Mexico. Retrieved from: http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis. 2006. 8. Hikmet N. (1999) Factors Affecting The Use of Information Technology. University of Rhode Island, Unpublished Thesis, Dissertetion, Rhode Island. 9. Johnson D. E. (2012). “Electronic Medical Records (EMR): Issues and Implementation Perspectives”. In: A. Kolker and P. Story (eds) Work Engagement: Management Engineering for Effective Healthcare Delivery: Principles and Applications, pp: 333-351. IGI Global, USA. 10. McBride S., Delaney J. M. and Tietze M. (2012) Health Information Technology and Nursing. American Journal of Nursing 112(8): 36-42. 11. Moody L. E., Slocumb E., Berg B. and Jackson M. (2004) Electronic Health Records Documentation in Nursing Nurses’ Perceptions, Attitudes, and Preferences. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 22(6): 337-44. 12. Monteiro A. P. T. (2016) Cyborgs, Biotechnologies, and Informatics in Health Care-New Paradigms in Nursing Sciences. Nursing Philosophy 17(1): 19-27. 13. Nir N. and Collum T.H. (2011) Benefits and Drawbacks of Electronic Health Record Systems. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 4: 47–55. 14. Oliveira N. B. and Peres H. H. C. (2015) Evaluation of The Functional Performance and Technical Quality of an Electronic Documentation System of the Nursing Process. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem 23(2): 242-249. 15. Piscotty R. J., Kalisch B. and Thomas A. G. (2015) Impact of Healthcare Information Technology on Nursing Practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 47(4): 287-293. 16. Seçginli S. ve Erdoğan S. (2012) 11. International Congress on Nursing Informatics: Advancing Global Health Through Informatics. SmyrnaMed, 2: 53-54. 17. Takvorian S. (2015) A Reporter's Toolkit: Health Information Technology. Retrieved from: http://www.allhealth.org/publications/health_information_technology/ health_information_technology_toolkit.asp#background. 18. Tarcan G. Y. (2015) Individual Factors Affecting Hospital Manager’s Attitudes Towards Health Information Technologies. Hacettepe University Social Sciences Institute, Doctoral Thesis, Ankara. 19. Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B. and Davis F. D. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27(3): 425-478. 20. Young J., Eley D., Fahey P., Patterson E. and Hegney D. (2010) Enabling Research in General Practice Increasing Functionality of Electronic Medical Records. Australian Family Physician 39(7): 30-40.
Year 2017, Volume: 20 Issue: 4, 409 - 427, 29.12.2017

Abstract

References

  • 1. Alquraini H., Alhashem A. M., Shah M. A. and Chowdhury R. I. (2007) Factors Influencing Nurses’ Attitudes Towards The Use of Computerized Health Information Systems in Kuwaiti Hospitals. Journal of Advanced Nursing 57(4): 375-81. 2. Ammenwerth E., Gräber S., Herrmann G., Bürkle T. and König C. (2003) Evaluation of Health Information Systems—Problems and Challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics 71(2): 125-135. 3. Bilgiç Ş. and Şendir M. (2014) Nursing Informatics. Cumhuriyet Nursing Journal 3(1): 24-28. 4. Buntin M. B., Burke M. F., Hoaglin M. C. and Blumenthal D. (2011) The Benefits of Health Information Technology: A Review of The Recent Literature Shows Predominantly Positive Results. Health Affairs 30(3): 464-471. 5. Cipriano P. F., Dailey M., Dykes P. and Lamb G. (2013) The Importance of Health Information Technology in Care Coordination and Transitional Care. Nursing Outlook 62(6): 475-489. 6. Erdemir F., Hanoğlu Z. and Akman A. (2015) Computer and Internet Use of Nurses, and Their Opinion About the Value of Use of Computers in Nursing. 17-20. Retrieved from: http://www.turkmia.org/kongre/cd/pdf/16.pdf. 7. Hikmet N., Davis C. and Hockett K. (2006) Uncovering The Antecedents For Measuring The Nursing's Contribution to Quality of Care Provided to Patients: Role of Health Information Technology on The Care Coordination. Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems, August 04th-06th 2006, Acapulco, Mexico. Retrieved from: http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis. 2006. 8. Hikmet N. (1999) Factors Affecting The Use of Information Technology. University of Rhode Island, Unpublished Thesis, Dissertetion, Rhode Island. 9. Johnson D. E. (2012). “Electronic Medical Records (EMR): Issues and Implementation Perspectives”. In: A. Kolker and P. Story (eds) Work Engagement: Management Engineering for Effective Healthcare Delivery: Principles and Applications, pp: 333-351. IGI Global, USA. 10. McBride S., Delaney J. M. and Tietze M. (2012) Health Information Technology and Nursing. American Journal of Nursing 112(8): 36-42. 11. Moody L. E., Slocumb E., Berg B. and Jackson M. (2004) Electronic Health Records Documentation in Nursing Nurses’ Perceptions, Attitudes, and Preferences. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 22(6): 337-44. 12. Monteiro A. P. T. (2016) Cyborgs, Biotechnologies, and Informatics in Health Care-New Paradigms in Nursing Sciences. Nursing Philosophy 17(1): 19-27. 13. Nir N. and Collum T.H. (2011) Benefits and Drawbacks of Electronic Health Record Systems. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 4: 47–55. 14. Oliveira N. B. and Peres H. H. C. (2015) Evaluation of The Functional Performance and Technical Quality of an Electronic Documentation System of the Nursing Process. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem 23(2): 242-249. 15. Piscotty R. J., Kalisch B. and Thomas A. G. (2015) Impact of Healthcare Information Technology on Nursing Practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 47(4): 287-293. 16. Seçginli S. ve Erdoğan S. (2012) 11. International Congress on Nursing Informatics: Advancing Global Health Through Informatics. SmyrnaMed, 2: 53-54. 17. Takvorian S. (2015) A Reporter's Toolkit: Health Information Technology. Retrieved from: http://www.allhealth.org/publications/health_information_technology/ health_information_technology_toolkit.asp#background. 18. Tarcan G. Y. (2015) Individual Factors Affecting Hospital Manager’s Attitudes Towards Health Information Technologies. Hacettepe University Social Sciences Institute, Doctoral Thesis, Ankara. 19. Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B. and Davis F. D. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27(3): 425-478. 20. Young J., Eley D., Fahey P., Patterson E. and Hegney D. (2010) Enabling Research in General Practice Increasing Functionality of Electronic Medical Records. Australian Family Physician 39(7): 30-40.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Sevilay Şenol Çelik

Neşet Hikmet This is me

İhsaniye Ünal This is me

Publication Date December 29, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 20 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Şenol Çelik, S., Hikmet, N., & Ünal, İ. (2017). Health Information Technology in Nursing: Views and Attitudes of Nurse Managers. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 20(4), 409-427.
AMA Şenol Çelik S, Hikmet N, Ünal İ. Health Information Technology in Nursing: Views and Attitudes of Nurse Managers. HSİD. December 2017;20(4):409-427.
Chicago Şenol Çelik, Sevilay, Neşet Hikmet, and İhsaniye Ünal. “Health Information Technology in Nursing: Views and Attitudes of Nurse Managers”. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi 20, no. 4 (December 2017): 409-27.
EndNote Şenol Çelik S, Hikmet N, Ünal İ (December 1, 2017) Health Information Technology in Nursing: Views and Attitudes of Nurse Managers. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi 20 4 409–427.
IEEE S. Şenol Çelik, N. Hikmet, and İ. Ünal, “Health Information Technology in Nursing: Views and Attitudes of Nurse Managers”, HSİD, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 409–427, 2017.
ISNAD Şenol Çelik, Sevilay et al. “Health Information Technology in Nursing: Views and Attitudes of Nurse Managers”. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi 20/4 (December 2017), 409-427.
JAMA Şenol Çelik S, Hikmet N, Ünal İ. Health Information Technology in Nursing: Views and Attitudes of Nurse Managers. HSİD. 2017;20:409–427.
MLA Şenol Çelik, Sevilay et al. “Health Information Technology in Nursing: Views and Attitudes of Nurse Managers”. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 4, 2017, pp. 409-27.
Vancouver Şenol Çelik S, Hikmet N, Ünal İ. Health Information Technology in Nursing: Views and Attitudes of Nurse Managers. HSİD. 2017;20(4):409-27.