A Study on the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Impartiality in Private Hospitals

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 4, 767 - 788, 29.12.2018

Burhanettin Uysal , Metin Ateş

Öz

Organizational justice and impartiality also positively affect the performance of employees along

with their motivation. In order to achieve corporate goals and accomplish the purposes of the

organization, business managers need correctly to manage the perception of impartiality as well as

their perception of justice both for themselves and for their approaches and practices. In the

literature, although there are many studies about organizational justice, there is no study proving the

relationship between organizational justice and impartiality. This is a cross-sectional survey of

employees working in private hospitals to determine the impact of the impartiality principle on

organizational justice. Organizational justice considered as three dimensions and impartiality as two

dimensions and the relationship between dimensions was tried to be dealt with. The analysis of the

data was done with the SPSS 13.00 program and was conducted with 95% confidence level and 5%

tolerance. In the study Spearman correlation test which is one of the nonparametric test techniques

were used to investigate the relationship between dimensions. Besides, multiple regression analysis

was performed between dimensions in the scale. The study included 159 private hospitals in Istanbul.

Sample selection method was used in the study. According to this, questionnaire surveys were

conducted on 460 employees from a total of 16 private hospitals. In accordance with the results of the

correlation analysis, statistically significant and positive relations which have very low, low and

medium strength was found between dimensions of organizational justice and impartiality. According

to the results of regression analysis conducted to determine the effect of impartiality on

organizational justice; impartiality effected interactional justice (F= 35.41, p= 0.000), distributive

justice (F= 37.781, p= 0.000) and procedural justice (F= 6.255, p= 0.000) at the significant level.

13.3% of interactional justice (F= 35.141; p=0.000), 14.2% of distributive justice (F= 37.781; p=

0.000), and 2.7% of procedural justice (F= 6.255; p= 0.000) are explained by impartiality. The

hospital employees generally exhibited a positive approach to the justice dimensions, but they

exhibited a negative approach in the dimension of impartiality. In the study, it emerged that being

neutral in attitudes and behaviors towards the employees of managers were found to be the positive

effect to fair of managers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational Justice, Impartiality, Private Hospitals, Hospital Employees, Human Resources

Kaynakça

• 1. Ambrose ML, Arnaud A. (2005). Are Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice Conceptually Distinct? (Ed: Colquitt, J., Greenberg, J.). Handbook of Organizational Justice. Psychology Press. Mahwah. N.J. 2. Asunakutlu T. ve Avcı U. (2010) Aile İşletmelerinde Nepotizm Algısı ve İş Tatmini İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 15(2): 93-109. 3. Ateş M. (2012) Sağlık İşletmeciliği (2. Baskı). Beta Basım, İstanbul. 4. Baykal R. E. (2013) Örgütsel Adalet Algısı ile Performans Değerlendirme Sistemleri Arasındaki İlişki ve Bir Örnek Çalışma. Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul. 5. Beugre C. D. (1998) Managing Fairness in Organizations. Greenwood Press, Westport. 6. Bies R. J. (2005) “Are Procedural Justice and Interactional Justice Conceptually Distinct?” In Colquitt J. and Greenberg J. (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Justice. Psychology Press, Mahwah. N.J. 7. Bojer H. (2003) Distributional Justice Theory and Measurement. Routledge Taylor &Francis Group, London and New York 8. Büte M. (2011) Kayırmacılığın Çalışanlar Üzerine Etkileri ile İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları İlişkisi: Türk Kamu Bankalarına Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 15(1): 383-404. 9. Büte M. ve Tekarslan E. (2010) Nepotizm’in Çalışanlar Üzerine Etkileri:Aile İşletmelerine Yönelik Bir Saha Çalışması. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 6(1): 1-21. 10. Çelik K. ve Erdem A. R. (2012) Üniversitede Çalışan İdari Personele Göre Kayırmacılık. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 11: 23-30. 11. Chelladurai P. (2006) Human Resource Management in Sport and Recreation (Second Edition). Human Kinetics, USA. 12. Colquitt J. Greenberg J. and Zapata-Phelan C. P. (2005) “What Is Organizational Justice? A Historical Overview”. In Colquitt J. and Greenberg J. (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Justice [e-book]. Psychology Press, Mahwah, N.J. 13. Demirkıran M., Yardan E. D. ve Yorulmaz M. (2013) İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü Çalışanlarının Örgütsel Adalet Algılamalarının İletişim Doyumlarına Olan Etkisi. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi 5(2): 322-334. 14. Demirkıran M., Taşkaya S. and Dinç M. (2016) A Study on the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Hospitals. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research (IJBMER) 7(2): 547-554. 15. Dworkin R. W. (2003) From Liberal Values to Democratic Transition. Central European University Press (CEU Press), New York. 16. Erdem B., Çeribaş S. ve Karataş A. (2013) Otel İşletmelerinde Çalışan İşgörenlerin Kronizm (Eş–Dost Kayırmacılığı) Algıları: İstanbul’da Faaliyet Gösteren Bir, İki ve Üç Yıldızlı Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi 17(1): 51-69. 17. Erden P. S. (2014) The Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership, Perceived Employment Discrimination and Nepotism. Yeditepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, Master Thesis, Istanbul. 18. Fleischacker S. (2004) A Short History of Distributive Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 19. Greenberg J, Colquitt JA. (2005) Handbook of Organizational Justice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc. USA. 20. Kelsen H. (1960) What is Justice? University of California, Berkeley. 21. Lengfeld H. (2007) “Sunjective Impartiality: Justice Judgements between Morality and Self- Interest”. In Vermunt R. and Törnblom K. Y. (eds.) Distributive and Procedural Justice: Research and Social Applications. Routledge, Aldershot. 22. Karasar N. (2004) Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (13. Baskı). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara. 23. MacLachlan M., Stuart C. C. and McAuliffe E. (2010) Aid Triangle: Recognising the Humn Dynamics of Dominance, Justice and Identity. Zed Books, London. 24. Miller D. and Walzer M. (1995) Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. GBR: Oxford University Press, Oxford. 25. Mitchell J. I., Gagné M., Beaudry A. and Dyer L. (2012) The Role of Perceived Organizational Support, Distributive Justice and Motivation in Reactions To New Information Technology. Computers in Human Behavior 28(2): 729-738. 26. Murphy K. and Traninger A. (2014) The Emergence of Impartiality [e-book]. Brill NV, Leiden. 27. O'Neill S. (1997) Impartiality In Context: Grounding Justice In A Pluralist World [e-book]. State University of New York Press, Albany. 28. Polat S. ve Kazak E. (2014) Okul Yöneticilerinin Kayırmacı Tutum ve Davranışları ile Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Adalet Algıları Arasındaki İlişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi (Educational Administration: Theory and Practice) 20(1): 71-92. 29. Price J. L. (1997) Handbook of Organizational Measurement. International Journal of Manpower 18(4/5/6): 305-558. 30. Rawls J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, USA. A Study on the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Impartiality in Private Hospitals 787 31. Rescher N. (2002) Fairness: Theory and Practice of Distributive Justice. Routledge, Aldershot. 32. Sayü P. (2014) The Relationship Between Organizational Justice And Work Alienation. Marmara University, Institute of Social Sciences, Master Thesis, Istanbul. 33. Tortop N., Aykaç B., Yayman, H. ve Özer M. A. (2010) İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi (4.Baskı). Nobel Yayınevi, Ankara. 34. Törnblom K. Y. and Vermunt R. (2007) Distributive and Procedural Justice: Research and Social Applications. Ashgate Publishing Limited, England. 35. Traninger A. (2014) “Taking Sides And The Prehistory of Impartiality In Traninger” A. and Murphy K. (eds) The Emergence Of Impartiality [e-book]. Brill, Leiden. 36. Uysal B. (2018) Örgütsel Adalet Üzerinde Yansızlık İlkesinin Etkisini Belirlemeye Yönelik Özel Hastanelerde Yapılan Bir Araştırma. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul. 37. Kaptanoğlu A. Y ve İşçi E. (2013) Sağlık Alanında Hipotezden Teze: Veri Toplama ve Çözümleme Serüveni. Beşir Kitabevi, İstanbul.