Farklı dönem ve dozlarda naftalin asetik asit (NAA) uygulamalarının pamuğun (Gossypium hirsutum L.) verim ve bazı tarımsal özelliklerine etkisi

Year 2024, Volume: 28 Issue: 2, 335 - 344, 21.06.2024

Hasan Haliloğlu Orhan Çoklu

https://doi.org/10.29050/harranziraat.1423585

Abstract

Bu çalışma farklı dönem ve dozlarda naftalin asetik asit (NAA) uygulamalarının pamuğun (Gossypium hirsutum L.) verim ve bazı tarımsal özelliklerine etkisini belirlemek amacıyla planlanmıştır. Deneme Şanlıurfa ili Harran Ovası koşullarında 2017 ve 2018 yılları yetiştirme sezonlarında tesadüf blokları deneme deseninde üç tekrarlamalı olarak kurulmuştur. NAA uygulamaları kontrol, taraklanma başlangıcı + çiçeklenme başlangıcı (T.B.+Ç.B.) dönemlerinde (15+15 g da-1, 30+30 g da-1, 45+45 g da-1), taraklanma başlangıcı + çiçeklenme doruğu (T.B.+Ç.D.) dönemlerinde (15+15 g da-1, 30+30 g da-1, 45+45 g da-1) ve çiçeklenme başlangıcı + çiçeklenme doruğu (Ç.B.+Ç.D.) dönemlerinde (15+15 g da-1, 30+30 g da-1, 45+45 g da-1) olacak şekilde uygulamalar yapılmıştır. Çalışmada, en yüksek kütlü pamuk verimi, meyve dalı sayısı, koza sayısı, koza kütlü pamuk ağırlığı Ç.B.30+Ç.D.30 uygulamasından, en yüksek erkencilik oranı Ç.B.45+Ç.D.45 uygulamasından ve en yüksek bitki boyu Ç.B.15+Ç.D.15 uygulamasından elde edilmiştir. Farklı dönemlerde bölünmüş dozlar şeklinde NAA uygulamalarının 100 tohum ağırlığı ve odun dalı sayısına herhangi bir etkisi olmamıştır. Çırçır randımanı ve lif indeksi özelliklerinde NAA uygulamalarının etkisinin olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu çalışmada; kütlü pamuk verimleri 435.43 kg da-1 ile 762.01 kg da-1 arasında değişmiştir. Harran Ovası koşullarında kütlü pamuk için Ç.B.30+Ç.D.30 uygulaması tercih edilmelidir.

Keywords

Pamuk, naftalin asetik asit, farklı dönem, doz, verim

Effect of naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) applications at different periods and doses on the yield and some agricultural characteristics of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Abstract

This study was conductedito determine the effect of naphthalene aceticı acid application (NAA) on the yield and some agricultural properties of cotton. The experiment was established under the Harran Plain conditions of Şanlıurfa province in 2017 and 2018 growing seasons as randomized completeıblock design with threeıreplications. NAA applications were performed as follow, the control, at the beginning of squaring + the beginning of flowering (B.S.+B.F.) periods (150+150 g ha-1, 300+300 g ha-1, 450+450 g ha-1), at the beginning of squaring + the peak of flowering (B.S.+P.F.) (150+150 g ha-1, 300+300 g ha-1, 450+450 g ha-1), and at the beginnig of flowering + the peak of flowering (B.F.+P.F.) periods (150+150 g ha-1, 300+300 g ha-1, 450+450 g ha-1). As a result of the study, the highest number of sympodial branches, number of bolls, boll seed cotton weight and seed cotton yield were obtained from B.F.300 +P.F.300 g ha-1 application, the highest earliness ratio was obtained from B.F.450+P.F.450 g ha-1 application and the highest plant height was obtained from B.F.150+P.F.150 g ha-1 application. NAA applications in divided doses at different periods were’nt have effect on the 100 seed weight and number of monopodial branches. The effect of NAA applications on ginning outturn and fiber index properties was not seen. In this study, the seed cotton yield varied between 4354.3 kg ha-1 and 7620.1 kg ha-1. In Harran Plain conditions, B.F.300+P.F.300 g ha-1 application can be would rather for seed cotton yield.

Keywords

Cotton, Naphthalene acetic acid, different periods, dose, yield

References

• Ali, S.S., Abro, G.H., Rustamani, M.A. & Nizamani, S.M. (2012). Effect of Application of Plant Growth Regulators on Earias vittella (Fabricius), Infestation and Yield Components of Cotton. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 8: 677-682.
• Abro, G.H., Syed, T.S., Unar, M.A. & Zhang, M.S. (2004). Effect of a plant growth regulator and micronutrients on insect pest infestation and yield components of cotton. Journal of Entomology, 1(1): 12-16.
• Anonim, (2017a). Yaşar tarım toprak analiz laboratuvarı.
• Anonim, (2017b). http://gentatarim.com/urun/biofortune-bitki-gelisim-duzenleyicisi/
• Anonim, (2018). Yaşar tarım toprak analiz laboratuvarı.
• Anonymous, (2017). http://www.minitab.com/en-us/ Chen, R.L., Pan, W.Q., Gao, S.T., Gu, D.L. & Gao, D.Y. (1997). A Preliminary Study on The Technique of Foliar Spraying of Concentrated N on Cotton During the Boll Period. Field Crop Abstracts: 501-607.
• Çoklu, O., 2018. Farklı Doz ve Dönemlerde Naftalin Asetik Asit (NAA) Uygulamalarının Pamuğun Verim, Verim Unsurları ve Lif Teknolojik Özelliklerine Etkisi. Harran Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarla Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 57 sayfa.
• Gencsoylu, I. (2009). Effect of plant growth regulators on agronomic characteristics, lint quality, pests and predators in cotton. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 28(2):147-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-009-9083-x
• Gillani, S.M.N, Iqbal, R.M, Akram, M. Ajmal, F. Wasim, M.A. & Ijaz, M. (2015). Performance of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) through foliar application of growth promoters. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Science, 13(1): 20‐26.
• Gobi, R. & Vaiyapui, V. (2013). Effect of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and economics of irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Archives, 13(1): 101-103.
• Jadhav, S.G., Chavan, D.A. & Waghmare, Y.M. (2015). Effect of plant spacing, growth regulator and nutrient management on yield, quality and economics of BT cotton. Journal of Cotton Research and Development, 29 (1): 48-52.
• Jost, P., Whitaker, J., Brown, S.M. & Bednarz, C. (2006). Use of plant growth regulators as a management tool in cotton. Univ of Georgia Coop Ext Bulletin 1305.
• Kataria, G.K. & Khanpara, M.D. (2011). Effect of naphthalene acitic acid on growth, yield attributes and yield in irrigated bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Indian Journal of Applied Research, 1(1): 10-11. https://doi.org/10.36106/ijar
• Koler, P., Patil, B.C. & Pawar, K.N. (2010). Foliar spray of agrochemicals on square drying in different cotton genotypes. Journal of Cotton Research and Development, 4(2): 210-215.
• Koler, P. & Patil, B. C. (2011). Influence of agrochemicals on growth and yield of cotton genotypes. Journal of Cotton Research and Development, 25(1): 63-67.
• Koler, P. & Patil, B.C. (2013). Plant growth regulators and its influence on yield, morphophysiological and biochemical parameters in hybrid cotton. Journal of Cotton Research and Development, 27(1): 50-55.
• Liu, C. et al. (2022). Novel plant growth regulator guvermectin from plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria boosts biomass and grain yield in rice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 70(51): 16229-16240. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c07072
• MGM, 2018. Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü, Şanlıurfa ili rasat kayıtları.
• Patel, J. K. (1993). Response of cotton (G. hirsutum) to triacontanol and naphthalene acetic acid sprays. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 38(1): 97-101.
• Parveen, S., Iqbal, R.M., Akram, M., IqbaL, F., Tahir, M. & Rafay, M. (2017). Improvement of growth and productivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) through foliar applications of naphthalene acetic acid. Ciências Agrárias, 38(2): 561-570. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p561
• Rajendran, K., Palchamy, A., Sankaranarayanan, K., Prabakaran, K. & Bhararhi, K. (2011). Enhancing Productivity of Summer Irrigated Cotton Through Plant Growth Regulator and Foliar Nutrition. Madras Agricultural Journal, 98(7-9): 248-250.
• Raoofi, M. M., Dehghan, S., Keighobadi, M. & Poodineh, O. (2014). Effect of naphthalene acetic acid in agriculture and the role of increase yield. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 7(14): 1378-1380. http://ijagcs.com/.../1378-1380.pdf
• Ren, M., Mao, G., Zheng, H., Wang, W. & Tang, Q. (2023). Growth changes of tomato seedlings responding to sodium salt of α‑naphthalene acetic acid and potassium salt of fulvic acid. Scientific Reports, 1: 4024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31023-x
• Sarlach, R.S. & Sharma, B. (2012). Influence of Naphthalene acetic acid and cobalt chloride on growth and yield of cotton hybrids. International Journal of Plant Research, 25(1): 76-80.
• Sawan, Z.M., Sakr, R.A. and Ahmed, F.A. (1989). Effect of 1-naphthaleneacetic acid on the seed, protein, oil, and fatty acids of Egyptian cotton. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 66(10): 1472-1474.
• Sawan, Z. M. & Sakr, R.A. (1998). Effect of 1-naphthalene acetic acid concen-trations and the number of applications on the yield components, yield and fibre properties of the Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.). Agronomie, 18 (4): 275-283.
• Thind, S.K., Pathak, D. & Sohu, R.S. (2007). GA3 and NAA affect some physio-morphological features and number of bolls in cotton (Gossypium spp.) Journal of Cotton Research and Development, 21(2): 201-205.
• Worley, S.JR., Harmon H.R., Harrel, D.C. & Culp, T.W. (1976). Ontogenetic Model of Coton Yield. Crop Science, 16: 30-34.