In the light of studies in the World, Denizli local chicken breed

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide information about the conservation of local genetic resources and in the light of these, what can be done on the Denizli native chicken breed. Turkey, located in a transition region, have only two registered local chicken breeds as Denizli and Gerze. Native chicken breeds are those resources that should be conserved for maintaining genetic variation. Domestic chicken breeds, which are resistant to the adverse conditions in their region, are especially suitable genetic materials for alternative grazing systems where chickens are more exposed to adverse environmental conditions. Increasing their yield by selection will positively affect the profitability of alternative systems. Denizli breed is more suitable for genetic breeding studies because of its higher productivity for body weight and egg production than Gerze. In addition, it may be possible to produce geo-labelled chicken meat and eggs using Denizli breed due to its high level of recognition and being the symbol of a city. Many studies have been conducted on the phenotypic and genetic characterization of native chicken breeds in many countries. The next step is the breeding of native breeds by selection. In Turkey, these studies should be started as soon as possible since they will reveal the heritability and genetic correlations, which are the first steps for the genetic improvement of the breed.

Keywords

• Animal
• Organic
• Native
• Phynotype
• Heredity

Dünyadaki Çalışmalar Işığında Denizli Yerli Tavuk Irkı

Abstract

Bu makalenin amacı, yerel genetik kaynakların korunması konusunda ve bunların ışığında Denizli yerli tavuk ırkı üzerinde yapılabilecekler hakkında bilgi sunmaktır. Türkiye geçiş bölgesinde bir coğrafyada olmasına karşılık tescil edilmiş sadece iki yerli tavuk ırkı (Denizli ve Gerze) bulunmaktadır. Yerli tavuk ırkları genetik varyasyonun sürdürülmesi bakımından korunması gereken kaynaklardır. Bulundukları bölgedeki olumsuz koşullara dayanıklı olan yerli tavuk ırkları özellikle tavukların olumsuz çevre koşullarına daha fazla maruz kaldıkları otlatmalı alternatif sistemler için uygun genetik materyallerdir. Bunların seleksiyonla verimlerinin arttırılması alternatif sistemlerdeki kârlılığı olumlu yönde etkileyecektir. Denizli ırkı Gerze’ye oranla canlı ağırlık ve yumurta verimi bakımlarından daha yüksek verimli olduğundan genetik ıslah çalışmaları için daha uygundur. Ayrıca yüksek düzeyde tanınırlığı ve bir ilimizin simgesi olması nedeni ile Denizli ırkımızı kullanarak coğrafi etiketli tavuk eti ve yumurtası üretmek mümkün olabilir. Pek çok ülkede yerli tavuk ırklarının fenotipik ve genetik karakterizasyonu konusunda çok fazla sayıda çalışma yapılmıştır. Bir sonraki aşama yerli ırkların seleksiyonla ıslahıdır. Türkiye’de ırkın genetik ıslahının ilk adımları olan kalıtım dereceleri ve genetik korelasyonların saptanması çalışmalarına bir an önce başlanmalıdır.

Keywords

• Hayvan
• Organik
• Yerli
• Fenotip
• Kalıtım

References

1. Aksoy FT, Atasoy F, Onbaşılar EE. 2002. Denizli ırkı günlük civcivlerde tüylenme özelliklerinden yararlanılarak cinsiyet belirleme olanakları, Türk Veteriner ve Hayvancılık Dergisi, 26(3): 567-575.
2. Akşit M, Özdemir D. 2008. Yüksek sıcaklıklarda Denizli ırkı tavuklarda HSP 70 sentezi ve bazı verim özellikleri üzerine bir araştırma. TÜBİTAK Proje No: 105 O 400, AYDIN.
3. Alabi OJ, Ng’ambin JW, Norris D. 2012. Effect of egg weight on physical egg parameters and hatchability of indigenous Venda chickens. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 7(2): 166-172.
4. Anonim. 1998. The book of American standard of perfection, American Poultry Association. Global Interprint, Petaluma, CA.
5. Anonim. 2000. The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare Adopted 21 March 2000. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/sci-com_scah_out39_en.pdf (Erişim: 28.06.2017).
6. Anonim. 2009. Türkiye evcil hayvan genetik kaynakları, ANKARA, https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/TAGEM/Belgeler/yayin/Katalog%20T%C3%BCrk%C3%A7e.pdf (Erişim: 24.11.2020).
7. Anonim, 2010. Label Rouge: Pasture-based poultry production in France. National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service, ATTRA A project of the National Centre for Appropriate Technology, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.682.3928&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Erişim: 09.02.2021)
8. Atasoy F, Gürcan, İS. 2000. Bir Denizli tavuğu sürüsünde canlı ağırlık ve yumurta ağırlığı özellikleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 47(3): 265-269.

9. Cerolini S, Madeddu M, Zaniboni L, Cassinelli C, Mangiagalli MG, Marelli SP. 2010. Breeding performance in the İtalian chicken breed Mercianel della Brianza, Italian Journal of Animal Science, 9(4): 382-385.
10. Dalal DS, Ratwan P, Yadav AS. 2019. Genetic evaluation of growth, production and reproduction traits in Aseel and Kadaknath chickens in agroclimatic conditions of northern India. Biological Rhythm Research. DOI:10.1080/09291016.2019.1621081.
11. Dana N, van der Waaji EH, van Arendonk JAM. 2011. Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for body weights and egg production in Horro chicken of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43(1): 21-28.
12. Das AK, Kumar S, Rahim A, Kokate LS. 2017. Genetic and non-genetic parameters of grower and layer performances in CARI-Sonali chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 87(6): 786-789.
13. Dereli Fidan E, Nazlıgül, A. 2012. Denizli Irkı Tavuklarda Kafes Pozisyonu ve Yoğunluğunun Bazı Verim Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri. Animal Health, Production and Hygiene, 1(1):31-37.
14. Di Rosa AR, Chiofalo B, Lo Presti V, Chiofalo V, 2020. Egg quality from Sciliana and Livorno Italian autochthonous chicken breeds reared in organic system. Animals, 10(5): 864-877.
15. Edriss MA, Khosravinia H, Pourreza J. 2000. Heritability of some body measurements and carcass characteristics in native chickens and their crosses with an exotic breed, Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4(1): 69-80.
16. Elbeltagy AR, Bertolini F, Fleming DS, Van Goor A, Ashwell CM, Schmidit CJ, Kugonza DR, Lamont SJ, Rothschild MF. 2019. Natural selection footprints among African chicken breeds and village ecotypes, Frontiers in Genetics, 10 (Article number: 376).
17. Ertuğrul M, Akın AO, Yıldırır, M, Dellal G, Togan İ, Pabuçcuoğlu S, Koyuncu M, Öner Y, Yılmaz O, Koncagül S, Pehlivan E, Kiraz S, Elmacı C, Dağ B, Özder M. 2015. Türkiye çiftlik hayvanları genetik kaynaklarının korunması ve sürdürülebilir kullanımı. Ziraat Mühendisleri Odası VIII. Teknik Kongresi, ANKARA
18. FAO, 2007. The state of the world's animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. Rischkowsky B., Pilling D. (Eds.), Roma. http://www.fao.org/3/a-a1260e.pdf (Erişim: 24.11.2020).
19. Ferrante V, Mugnai C, Ferrari L, Marelli SP. Spagnoli E, Lolli S. 2016. Stress and reactivity in three Italian chicken breeds, Italian Journal of Animal Science, 15(2): 303-309.
20. Ghorbani S, Jeloghani-Niaraki S. 2019. Estimation of genetic trends and parameters for some economic trait using different linear models in Mazandaran native chickens. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 37(2): 179-193.
21. Haunshi S, Doley S, Shakuntala I, Bujarbaruah KM. 2009. Production performance of indigenous chicken of northeastern region and improved varieties developed for backyard farming. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 79(9): 901-905.
22. Haunshi S, Doley S, Kadirvel G. 2010. Comparative studies on egg, meat and semen qualities of native and improved chicken varieties developed for backyard poultry production, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42: 1013-1019.
23. Haunshi S, Niranjan M, Shanmugam M, Padhi MK, Reddy MR, Sunitha R, Rajkumar U, Padhi MK. 2011. Characterization of two Indian native chickens breeds for production, egg and semen quality, and welfare traits. Poultry Science, 90(2): 314-320.
24. Hodges J. 2006. Conservation of genes and culture: Historical and contemporary issues. Poultry Science, 85(2): 200-209.
25. Jafarnejad A, Kamali MA, Fatemi SJ, Aminafshar M. 2017. Genetic evaluation of laying traits in Iranian indigenous hens using univariate and bivariate animal models, Journal of Animal and Plant Science, 27(1): 20-27.
26. Jeon HJ, Choe JH, Jung Y, Kruk ZA, Lim DG, Jo C. 2010. Comparison of the chemical composition, textural characteristics, and sensory properties of North and South Korean native chickens and commercial broilers. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resource, 30(2): 171-178.
27. Jun G, Kehua W, Liang Q, Taocun D, Manman S, Meng M, Yuping H. 2017. Random regression analyses to model the longitudinal measurements of yolk proportions in the laying chickens, Poultry Science, 96(11): 3852-3857.
28. Kaplan G, Aksoy FT. 2009. Denizli ırkı bir tavuk sürüsünde telek rengi özellikleri ve canlı ağırlığın incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 56: 293-303.
29. Karaman M, Kırdağ N. 2012. Mitochondrial DNA D-loop and 12S Regions Analysis of the Long-Crowing Local Breed Denizli Fowl from Turkey, Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (2): 191-196.
30. Kaya A, Yıldız MA. 2008. Genetic diversity among Turkish native chickens, Denizli and Gerze, estimated by microsatellite markers. Biochemical Genetics, 46, 480-491.
31. Khan MT, Mahmud A, Zahoor I, Javed K. 2017. Organic and inorganic selenium in Aseel chicken diets: Effect on hatching traits. Poultry Science, 96(5): 1466-1472.
32. Khosravinia H, Edriss MA, Pourreza J, Anssari S. 1999. Genetic and phenotypic parameters of growth, feed consumption and conversion ratio of native chicken and their crosses with exotic breed. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 3(1): 35-49.
33. Li JJ, Zhang L, Ren P, Wang Y, Yin LQ, Ran JS, Zhang XX, Liu YP. 2020. Genotype frequency distributions of 28 SNP marker in two commercial lines and five Chinese native chicken populations. BMC Genetics, 21(1), Article Number: 12.
34. Lordelo M, Cid J, Cordovil CMDS, Alves SP, Bessa RJB, Carolino I. 2020. A comparison between the quality of eggs from indigenous chicken breeds and that from commercial layers, Poultry Science, 99(3): 1768-1776.
35. Manjula P, Park H-B, Seo D, Choi N, Jin S, Ahn SJ, Heo KN, Kang BS, Lee J-H. 2018. Estimation of heritability and genetic correlation of body weight gain and growth curve parameters in Korean native chicken. Asian-Australas Journal of Animal Science, 31(1): 26-63.
36. Mbajiorgu CA. 2011. Effect of hatching size on hatchability and chick hatch-weight of indigenous Venda chickens. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 45 (4): 300-304.
37. Mohammadi A, Naderi Y, Nabavi R, Jaferi F. 2018. Determination of best model for estimation of genetic parameters on the Fars native chicken traits using Bayesian and REML methods, Genetica, 50(2): 431-447.
38. Mookprom S, Boonkum W, Kunhareang S, Siripanya S, Duangjinda M. 2017. Genetic evaluation of egg production curve in Thai native chickens by random regression and spline models, Poultry Science, 96(2):274-281.
39. Mosca F, Zaniboni L, Stella S, Kuster CA, Iaffaldano N, Cerolini S. 2018. Slaughter performance and meat quality of Milanino chickens reared according to a specific free-range program. Poultry Science, 97(4): 1148-1154.
40. Moula L, Antoine-Moussiaux N, Decuypere E, Farnir F, Mertens K, De Baerdemaeker J, Leroy P. 2010. Comparative study of egg quality traits in two Belgian local breeds and two commercial lines of chickens. Arch.Geflügelk, 74(3):164-171.
41. Mtileni BJ, Muchadeyi FC, Maiwashe A, Chimonyo M, Dzama K. 2012. Conservation and utilization of indigenous chicken genetic resources in Southern Africa. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 68(4): 727-745.
42. Muir WM, Aggrey SE. 2003. Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, CABI Publishing, Oxon. UK, p: 484.
43. Niknafs S, Nejatı-Javaremi A, Mehrabani-Yeganeh H, Fatemi SA. 2012. Estimation of genetic parameters for body weight and egg production traits in Mazandran native chicken. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44: 1437-1443.
44. Norris D, Ngambi JW. 2006. Genetic parameters estimates for body weight in local Venda chickens. Tropical Aniamal Health and Production, 38: 605-609.
45. Özdemir D, Durmuş-Ozdemir E, De Marchi M, Cassandro M. 2013. Conservation of local Turkish and Italian chicken breeds: a case study, Italian Journal of Animal Science, 12(2): 313-319.
46. Özdemir D, Maretto F, Cassandro M, Eugen Ulmar KG. 2016. Comparison of genetic diversity of Turkish and Italian local chicken breeds for further conservation strategy, European Poultry Science, 80: 143.
47. Özdemir D, Cassandro M. 2018. Assessment of population structure and genetic diversity of Denizli chicken subpopulations using SSR markers. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 17(2): 312-320.
48. Özdoğan N, Gürcan İS, Bilgen A. 2007. Denizli ve Gerze yerli tavuklarında yumurta ağırlığı ve yumurta ağırlığının tekrarlama derecesi. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 47(1): 21-28.
49. Özdoğan N. 2011. Conservation of Denizli and Gerze chicken breeds., RBI 8th Global Conference of Animal Genetic Resources, TEKİRDAĞ, TÜRKİYE, 4-8 October, https://docplayer.net/35358314-4-8-october-2011-8-th-conference-on-the-conservation-of-animal-genetic-resources.html (Erişim: 24.11.2020)
50. Rizzi C, Contiero B, Cassandro M. 2013. Growth patterns of Italian local chicken populations. Poultry Science, 92(8): 2226-2235.
51. Salehinasab M, Zerehdaran S, Abbasi MA, Alijani S, Hassani S. 2014. Genetic properties of productive traits in Iranian Native Fowl: Genetic relationship between performance and egg quality traits. Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology, 16: 1055-1062.
52. Singh MK, Kumar S, Sharma RK, Singh SK, Singh B, Singh DV. 2019. Genetic parameters estimates for juvenile body weight in indigenous Uttara chickens. Indian Journal of Animal Resource, 53(4): 429-434.
53. Sirri F, Zampiga M, Soglia F, Meluzzi A, Cavani C, Petracci M. 2018. Quality characterization of eggs from Romagnola hens, an Italian Local breed. Poultry Science, 97(11): 4131-4136.
54. Şekeroğlu A. 1994. Gerze (Hacıkadın) ve Denizli tavuk ırklarının yumurta verimi ve kalite özellikleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, SAMSUN.
55. Tixier-Boichard M, Bordas A, Rognon X. 2009. Characterization and monitoring of poultry genetic resources. World’s Poultry Science Association, 65(2):272-285.
56. Wang KH, Shi SR, Dou TC, Sun HJ. 2009. Effect of a free-range raising system on growth performance, carcass yield and meat quality of slow-growing chicken, Poultry Science, 88(10): 2219-2223.
57. Wang Y, Saelao P, Cahathavixay K, Gallrdo R, Bunn D, Lamont SJ, Dekkers JM, Kelly T, Zhou H. 2018. Physiological responses to heat stress in two genetically distinct chicken inbred lines. Poultry Science, 97(3): 770-780.
58. Zhang Z, Xu ZQ, Luo YY, Zhang HB, Gao N, He JL, Ji CL, Zhang DX, Li JQ, Zhang XQ. 2017. Whole genomic prediction of growth and carcass traits in a Chinese quality chicken population. Journal of Animal Science, 95(1): 72-80.