A Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of Traditional vs. MPL (Multi-Crew Pilot License) Training Pathways on Operational Performance: A 15-Month FDM Data Study

Abstract

Quantitative data on the long-term operational impact of the Multi-Crew Pilot License (MPL) model, which has emerged as a competency-based alternative in the pilot training industry, remains limited. This study aims to quantitatively analyze the operational performance differences between First Officers (FOs) graduated from Traditional (CPL/IR/MCC) and MPL pathways using Flight Data Monitoring (FDM) metrics. This retrospective cohort study analyzed FDM data collected from a single airline fleet over a 15-month period (January 2024 - March 2025). The study included 123 MPL and 251 Traditional pathway graduate FOs. Exceedance rates (per 1,000 segments) for 17 distinct FDM events and 7 critical manual flight parameters were compared, evaluating statistical significance at the p < 0.05 level using Fisher’s Exact Test. The analysis revealed a statistically significant lower-risk profile for the MPL group in critical landing parameters. The MPL group experienced significantly fewer exceedances in events such as ‘Hard Landing’ (p = 0.008) and ‘Long Touchdown’ (p < 0.001) compared to the traditional group. Furthermore, the MPL group performed better in procedural and safety-critical categories such as 'Fuel Imbalance' and 'Stall Warning'. These findings do not support claims that MPL training negatively impacts operational performance or manual flying skills.

Keywords

• Flight data monitoring (fdm)
• pilot training
• mpl(multi-crew pilot license)
• cpl (commercial pilot license)
• aviation safety
• evidence-based training (ebt)

Geleneksel vs. MPL (Çok Mürettebatlı Pilot Lisansı) Eğitim Yollarının Operasyonel Performans Üzerindeki Etkisinin Kantitatif Analizi: 15 Aylık FDM Veri Çalışması

Abstract

Pilot eğitim endüstrisinde yetkinlik temelli bir alternatif olarak ortaya çıkan Çoklu Mürettebat Pilot Lisansı (MPL) modelinin uzun vadeli operasyonel etkisine ilişkin nicel veriler sınırlı kalmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Uçuş Verilerini İzleme (FDM) metriklerini kullanarak, Geleneksel (CPL/IR/MCC) ve MPL eğitim yollarından mezun olan İkinci Pilotlar (FO) arasındaki operasyonel performans farklılıklarını nicel olarak analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Bu retrospektif kohort çalışması, tek bir havayolu filosundan 15 aylık bir süre boyunca (Ocak 2024- Mart 2025) toplanan FDM verilerini analiz etmiştir. Çalışmaya 123 MPL ve 251 Geleneksel eğitim yolu mezunu FO dahil edilmiştir. 17 farklı FDM olayı ve 7 kritik manuel uçuş parametresi için limit aşım oranları (1.000 segment başına) karşılaştırılmış; Fisher Exact Testi kullanılarak p <0,05 düzeyinde istatistiksel anlamlılık değerlendirilmiştir.

Analiz, kritik iniş parametrelerinde MPL grubu için istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha düşük bir risk profili ortaya koymuştur. MPL grubu, geleneksel gruba kıyasla 'Sert İniş' ($p = 0,008$) ve 'Uzun Temas/Pist Sonu İnişi' (p <0,001) gibi olaylarda önemli ölçüde daha az limit aşımı yaşamıştır. Dahası MPL grubu, 'Yakıt Dengesizliği' ve 'Stall Uyarısı' gibi prosedürel ve emniyet açısından kritik kategorilerde daha iyi performans göstermiştir. Bu bulgular, MPL eğitiminin

Keywords

• Uçuş verisi izleme (fdm)
• pilot eğitimi
• mpl (çoklu mürettebat pilot lisansı)
• cpl (ticari pilot lisansı)
• havacılık güvenliği
• kanıta dayalı eğitim (ebt)

References

1. Adanov, L. M., Macintyre, A., & Efthymiou, M. (2020). An exploratory study of pilot training and recruitment in Europe. International Journal of Aviation Science and Technology, 1(2), 44–51. google scholar
2. ATR Training Center. (2016). Flight data monitoring on ATR aircraft. ATR Training and Flight Operations Support. google scholar
3. Civil Aviation Authority. (2013a). Flight data monitoring (CAP 739, 2nd ed.). https://www.caa.co.uk google scholar
4. Civil Aviation Authority. (2013b). Multi-crew pilot license: A review of the first five years. google scholar
5. Cushing, T. S. (2013). Flight crew training: Multi-crew pilot license training versus traditional training and its relationship with job performance [Doctoral dissertation, Dowling College]. google scholar
6. European Union Aviation Safety Agency. (2020). Review of the multi-crew pilot license (MPL) training and operational experience. google scholar
7. Flin, R., O'Connor, P., & Crichton, M. (2008). Safety at the sharp end: A guide to non-technical skills. Ashgate. google scholar
8. International Air Transport Association. (2013). Evidence-based training implementation guide. google scholar

9. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2006). Annex 1 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation: Personnel licensing. google scholar
10. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2013). Safety management manual (Doc 9859). google scholar
11. International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations. (2015). Position paper: Multi-crew pilot license (MPL). google scholar
12. Lager, E., & Melin, M. (2022). Proactive flight safety: A feasibility study on optimal use of flight data monitoring and incident reports in an airline. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28(2), 1311–1315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1899608 google scholar
13. O'Connor, P., Flin, R., Fletcher, G., & Hemsley, N. (2011). Methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of flight crew CRM training in the UK aviation industry. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1(4), 311–326. google scholar
14. Salas, E., Wilson, K. A., Burke, C. S., & Wightman, D. C. (2006). Does crew resource management training work? An update, an extension, and some critical needs. Human Factors, 48(2), 392–412. google scholar
15. Schroeder, C., & Harms, D. (2007). MPL represents a state-of-the-art ab initio airline pilot training programme. ICAO Journal, 62(3), 15–16, 31–32. google scholar
16. Şentuna, Ö. (2025). Pilot eğitiminde çoklu ekip pilot lisansı entegre eğitim sisteminin incelenmesi: Bir durum çalışması [Yüksek lisans tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü]. google scholar
17. Thatcher, S. J., & Michaelides-Mateou, S. (2017). Educating aviation professionals: A comparison of the multi-crew pilot licence and the traditional commercial pilot licence. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 15.,57-60. google scholar
18. Transport Canada. (2010). Multi-crew pilot licence training program guide – Flight training (Version 3). google scholar
19. Wikander, R., & Dahlström, N. (2016). The multi-crew pilot license part II: The MPL data – Capturing the experience. Lund University School of Aviation. google scholar