ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE MINIMIZATION OF TRANSACTION COSTS

Yıl 2024, , 39 - 63, 31.07.2024

Cihan Güneş , Mert Akyüz

https://doi.org/10.53881/hiad.1352681

Öz

It is known that removing barriers in international trade is essential in developing and developed countries, as in different periods of history. With the increasing trade volume, Economic Integration has become a critical tool that creates more efficient resource allocation and reduces transaction costs. Economic Integration stages are institutions that emerged to minimize the high transaction costs in the market. In this context, explaining the stages of economic integration with the paradigms of the "New Institutional Economics" school is crucial. This study investigates the effect of economic integrations, defined as an institution, and the European Union, defined as an organization, on transaction costs. According to the New Institutional Economics approach, transaction costs can be minimized by institutions and organizations. Thus, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, and Rule of Law indices were used in this study to measure institutional quality. It can be concluded that institutions and organizations have a positive effect on the stages of economic integration and are effective in minimizing transaction costs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Institutions, Organizations, New Institutional Economics, Economic Integration, European Union

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NDE EKONOMİK ENTEGRASYON VE İŞLEM MALİYETLERİNİN MİNİMİZASYONU

Öz

Tarihin çeşitli dönemlerinde olduğu gibi uluslararası ticarette engellerin kaldırılmasının ülkelerin kalkınmasında önemli bir faktör olduğu bilinmektedir. Artan ticaret hacmiyle birlikte Ekonomik Bütünleşme daha etkin kaynak dağılımı yaratan ve işlem maliyetlerini azaltan önemli bir araç olarak öne çıkmıştır. Ekonomik Bütünleşme aşamaları, piyasada oluşan yüksek işlem maliyetlerini en aza indirebilmek amacıyla ortaya çıkan kurumlardır. Bu çerçevede ekonomik bütünleşme aşamalarını “Yeni Kurumsal İktisat” okulunun paradigmaları ile açıklamak önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı bir kurum olarak tanımlanan ekonomik bütünleşmelerin ve organizasyon olarak tanımlanan Avrupa Birliği’nin işlem maliyetleri üzerindeki etkisinin araştırılmasıdır. Yeni Kurumsal İktisat yaklaşımına göre işlem maliyetleri kurumlar ve organizasyonlar ile minimize edilebilmektedir. Bu nedenle kurumsal kaliteyi ölçebilmek için kamu etkinliği, regülasyon kalitesi ve hukuk devleti endeksleri bu çalışmada kullanılmıştır. Ekonomik bütünleşme aşamaları üzerinde, kurumların ve organizasyonların pozitif etkisinin olduğu ve işlem maliyetlerini minimize etmekte etkili oldukları vurgulanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kurumlar, Organizasyonlar, Yeni Kurumsal İktisat, Ekonomik Bütünleşme, Avrupa Birliği

Kaynakça

• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. (2005). Unbundling institutions, Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 949-995.
• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A. (2005a). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth, Handbook of economic growth, 1, 385-472. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. (2005b). The rise of Europe: Atlantic trade, institutional change, and economic growth, American Economic Review, 95(3), 546-579.
• Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., Robinson, J. A. (2014). Democracy does cause growth, NBER Working Paper Series, No: w20004.
• Aysan, A. F., Nabli, M. K., Véganzonès-Varoudakis, M. A. (2006). Governance and private investment in the Middle East and North Africa, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No: 3934
• Balassa, B. A. (1974). Types of economic integration (Vol. 1). Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Staff Working Paper, No:185.
• Balkır, C. (2010). Uluslararası Ekonomik Bütünleşme: Kuram, Politika ve Uygulama AB ve Dünya Örnekleri. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
• Barro, R. J. (1994). Democracy and Growth, National Bereau of Economic. Research (NBER) Working Paper, (No. 4909).
• Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Laeven, L., Maksimovic, V. (2006). The Determinants of Financing Obstacles, Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(6), 932-952.
• Beşkaya, A., ve Ursavaş, U. (2014). Eski ve Yeni Kurumsal İktisat: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz, Journal of Business Economics and Political Science, 3(5), 1-16.
• Bruno, R. L., Campos, N. F., ve Estrin, S. (2021). The effect on foreign direct investment of membership in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(4), 802-821.
• Burfisher, M. E. (2000). The Institutional Environment for Agricultural Trade in the FTAA (No. 749-2016-51345, pp. 190-206).
• Campos, N. F., Coricelli, F., ve Moretti, L. (2019). Institutional integration and economic growth in Europe. Journal of Monetary Economics, 103, 88-104.
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of The Firm, Economica. 4 (16), pp. 386-405
• Coase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. In Classic papers in natural resource economics (pp. 87-137). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• Çetin, T. (2012). Yeni Kurumsal İktisat, Sosyoloji Konferansları, (45). 43-77. De Haan, J., Sturm, J. E. (2000) On The Relationship Between Economic Freedom and Economic Growth, European Journal of Political Economy, 16(2), 215-241.
• Dollar, D., Kraay, A. (2003). Institutions, trade, and growth, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 133-162.
• European Commission (EC), (2003). The Internal Market – Ten Years without Frontiers. Commission Staff Working Paper, Sec (2002) 1417. Brussel. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/2/2002/EN/2-2002-1417-EN-1-0.Pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 4 Temmuz 2020)
• Eurostat, (2022). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (Erişim Tarihi: 16.09.2022) Fischer, S. (1993). The Role of Macroeconomic Factors in Growth, Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), 485-512.
• Hayes, D. J., Kerr, W. A. (1997). Progress Toward a Single Market: The New Institutional Economics of The NAFTA Livestock Sectors, No. 747-2016-51308, pp. 163-180.
• Karluk, R. (2013). Uluslararası Ekonomi, Teori ve Politika. 10. Baskı, Beta Basım, İstanbul.
• Ken Farr, W., Lord, R. A., Wolfenbarger, J. L. (1998) Economic Freedom, Political Freedom, and Economic Well-being: A Causality Analysis. Cato J., 18, 247.
• King, R. G., Levine, R. (1993). Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Right, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 717-737.
• Knapp, G. F. (1924). The State Theory of Money. McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought. London: Macmillan & Company Limited.
• Kreps, D.M. (1990). Corporate Culture and Economic Theory, in: Alt, J.E. and Shepsle, K.A. (eds.), Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Law, S. H., Azman-Saini, W. N. W. (2012). Institutional Quality, Governance, and Financial Development, Economics of Governance, 13(3), 217-236.
• Moussis, N. (2004). Avrupa Birliği Politikalarına Giriş Rehberi, Çev.: Ahmet Fethi, İstanbul, Mega Press.
• North, D. C. (1991). Institutions, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97-112.
• North, D. C. (1993a). Institutions and Credible Commitment, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 11-23.
• North, D. C. (1993b). Institutional Change: A Framework of Analysis, in Sven-Erik Sjostrand, ed. Institutional Change: Theory and Empirical Findings. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
• Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and Finance, Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113-1155.
• Potts, J. (2007). Evolutionary Institutional Economics, Journal of Economic Issues, 41(2), 341-350.
• Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for High Quality Growth: What they are and How to Acquire them, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No: 7540.
• Richter, R. (1998). European Monetary Union: Initial Situation, Alternatives, Prospects-In the Light of Modern Institutional Economics. Kredit und Kapital, (2), 159-191.
• Topan, A. (2002). The European Integration Process: A Historical and Comparative Institutional Analysis (Vol. 5). LIT Verlag Münster.
• Williamson, O. E. (1989). Transaction Cost Economics, In Richard Schmalansee and Robert Willig, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization. Volume 1, pp. 136-82. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
• Worldwide Governance Indicators (2022). https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/ (Erişim Tarihi: 16.09.2022)
• Yarbrough, B. V., Yarbrough, R. M. (1987). Institutions for The Governance of Opportunism in International Trade, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 3 (1), pp. 129-139
• Yılmaz, F. (2012). İktisat, Kurumsal İktisat ve İktisat Sosyolojisi, Sosyoloji Konferansları, (45), 1-17.