Some commentators in the classical period
attempted to define Tafsir according to terms of definition in logic. Taking
into consideration some previous definitions, they revealed defects of the
definitions and tried to make a description of Tafsir exposing its nature.
Owing to the fact that a definition exposes the nature of described stuff, this
brings out some matters about Tafsir’s nature. One of the questions emerged is
that: Does Tafsir explore only divine intention in the Qur’ān? According to the
answer given to the question, different definitions of Tafsir arised. Fanārī,
who brought out the issue, answered positively the question and illustrated the
issue merely with recitations related to pronunciations. Therefore, he added an
expression to the definition of Tafsir. In this study, it be will dealed with
specifically Tafsir and recitations that are not related to the Qur’ān’s
meaning; generally whether Tafsir investigates the Qur’ân outside its meaning
or not and what will enter to the scope of the investegating
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 30, 2018 |
Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 17 Issue: 34 |