“(Lâ tuallimû’n-nisâe hattan ﺎﻄﺧ ﺀﺎﺴﻨﻟﺍ ﺍﻮﻤﻠﻌﺗ ﻻ)We can say that
the text with the title ne Answer to the Hadith of the Hadith lı is an
interesting example of the efforts in this way. The article, which envisages
that women should not be taught to read and write, and which was transcribed as
a reş hadith ün in terms of the hadith technique, was published as unsigned in
the journal Sebilürreşâd. In the article, it was revealed that the expression
in question could not be if hadith, by using the sources of hadith, commentary,
rical and layer, and that this expression could not be made on the basis of
this statement. The footnotes were prepared by us and the related sources were
tried to be identified and also the explanations and corrections required by
the hadith technique were included. We would like to draw attention to one
point here: In this text, the unnamed author who wrote this article benefited
from al-Azâmâbâdî's Avni metl-Ma isimbûd's commentary on Abu Dawud. even the
criticism of some ravis, Şifâ bnt. It is a study on the evaluation of the mad rukye
m narrative about Abdullah and the sampling of some of the personalities of
Islam.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 30, 2006 |
Published in Issue | Year 2006 Volume: 5 Issue: 10 |