Pulmoner Embolizmde V/P Sintigrafisinin Tanısal Doğruluğu Ve V/P Spect'in V/P Planar Sintigrafiye Üstünlüğü

Year 2025, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 45 - 52, 25.02.2025

Semra Demirtaş Şenlik , Gülin Uçmak , Büşra Demirel , Hülya Efetürk İpek Öztürk , Aykut Kürşat Fidan , Figen Güneş

https://doi.org/10.52827/hititmedj.1553149

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada pulmoner embolizm (PE) tanısında, ventilasyon/perfüzyon (V/P) planar sintigrafinin ve tek foton emisyonlu bilgisayarlı tomografi (SPECT)’nin tanısal doğruluğunu ve SPECT’in planar görüntülemeye katkısını araştırmak amaçlandı.
Gereç ve Yöntem: 1 yıl boyunca Pulmoner Embolizm (PE) ön tanısı ile başvuran 204 hastanın kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Pulmoner embolizmde V/P sintigrafinin tanısal doğruluğu araştırılırken, sadece perüzyon sintigrafisi yapılan 3 hasta ve son tanısına ulaşılamayan 20 hasta dışlandı ve toplam 181 hasta istatistiksel analiz çalışmasına dahil edildi. SPECT’in planar görüntülemeye katkısı, V/P SPECT’ in PE ile uyumlu olarak raporlandığı ve son tanısı PE olan 48 hasta değerlendirilerek yapıldı.
Bulgular: 181 hasta göz önüne alındığında; V/P SPECT’in sensitivitesi %98 (48/49), özgüllüğü %94,7 (125/132), negatif öngörü değeri %99,2, pozitif öngörü değeri %87,3 ve doğruluk oranı %95,6 olarak hesaplandı. Planar sintigrafi için sırasıyla 71.4%, 95.4%, 90% (126/140), 85.3 % (35/41) ve 88.9% olarak hesaplandı. SPECT görüntüleme, planar V/P sintigrafi ile PE tanısı konulamayan 13 hastada (%27,1) PE ile uyumlu sonuçların raporlanmasını sağladı. V/P SPECT ile 9 hastada takip sintigrafisinde önemli olabilecek ek lezyonlar (%18,8) tespit edildi. Her iki yöntemin kesin tanı ile uyumunun istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu gözlemlendi, ancak SPECT bulgularının kesin tanı ile uyumunun (%95.6) planar bulguların kesin tanı ile uyumundan (%88.9) daha iyi olduğu görüldü.
Sonuç: Önceki çalışmalarla benzer şekilde, V/P sintigrafide her iki görüntüleme yöntemi de başarılı olmasına rağmen, SPECT’in planar görüntülemeye önemli ölçüde katkıda bulunduğu ve SPECT’in PE tanısında yüksek hassasiyet, özgüllük ve doğruluk sağladığı bulundu.

Keywords

Pulmoner Emboli, V/P Planar Sintigrafi, SPECT.

Ethical Statement

Bu retrospektif çalışma Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Eğitim Planlama ve Koordinasyon Kurulu’ndan onay almıştır (No: 2014/360, Tarih: 11.09.2014)

The Diagnostic Accuracy of V/P Scintigraphy in Pulmonary Embolism and Superiority of V/P SPECT to V/P Planar Scintigraphy

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of planar V/P scintigraphy and V/P single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients who referred to our clinic for V/P scintigraphy with prediagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), as well as to investigate the contribution of V/P SPECT technique to planar V/P technique.
Material and Method: The records of 204 patients, who were preliminarily diagnosed with PE within 1 year, were retrospectively reviewed. In our investigation of the diagnostic accuracy of V/P scintigraphy in for PE, we excluded three patients who only underwent perfusion scintigraphy and 20 patients whose final diagnoses could not be confirmed. This left a total of 181 patients included in the statistical analysis. Furthermore, we evaluated the contribution of SPECT to planar imaging in 48 patients, for whom V/P Scintigraphy were reported as positive and whose final diagnoses confirmed PE.
Results: The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy rate of V/P SPECT were calculated as 98%, 94.7%, 99.2%, 87.3%, and 95.6%, respectively. For planar scintigraphy, they were found to be 71.4%, 95.4%, 90%, 85.3%, and 88.9%, respectively. In SPECT, 13 (27.1%) patients who were not compatible with pulmonary embolism (PE) on planar imaging were found to have findings consistent with PE. In nine patients (18.8%), additional defects not observed on planar imaging were identified. Although the goodness of fit with the final diagnosis of both methods was statistically significant, SPECT (95.6%) performed better than planar (88.9%) imaging.
Conclusion: Consistent with previous studies, it was found that while both imaging methods were successful, SPECT demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy than planar scintigraphy in diagnosing PE. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that V/P scintigraphy can be safely deemed the first-choice in the diagnosis of PE.

Keywords

Pulmonary Embolism, V-P Scintigraphy, SPECT.

Ethical Statement

This retrospective study received approval from the Education Planning and Coordination Committee of Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital (No: 2014/360, Date: 11.09.2014)

References

• Douketis JD, Kearon C, Bates S, Duku EK, Ginsberg JS. Risk of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with treated venous thromboembolism. JAMA 1998;279:458-462.
• Nijkeuter M, Söhne M. Tick LW, et al. The natural course of hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism. Chest 2007;131:517-523.
• Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal 2020;41:543–603.
• Parker JA, Coleman RE, Grady E, et al. SNM Practice Guideline for Lung Scintigraphy 4.0, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology 2012;40:57-65.
• Bajc M, Neilly JB, Miniati M, Schuemichen C, Meignan M, Jonson B, EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy Part 1. Pulmonary imaging with ventilation/perfusion single photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:1356–1370.
• Wang L, Wang M, Yang T, Wu D, Xiong C, Fang W. A Prospective, Comparative Study of Ventilation-Perfusion Planar Imaging and Ventilation-Perfusion SPECT for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. J Nucl Med 2020;61:1832-1838.
• Zuckier LS, Moadel RM, Haramati LB, Freeman LM. Diagnostic Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Nucl Med 2020;61:630-631.
• Le Roux PY, Le Gal G, Salaun PY. Lung scintigraphy for pulmonary embolism diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: does the benefit-risk ratio really justify omitting the ventilation study? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020;47:2499-2500.
• Gutte H, Mortensen J, Jensen CV, et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism with combined ventilation-perfusion SPECT and low-dose CT: head-to-head comparison with multidetector CT angiography. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1987-1992.
• Bajc M, Schümichen C, Grüning T, et al. EANM guideline for ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and beyond. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019;46:2429-2451.
• Bajc M, Olsson B, Palmer J, Jonson B. Ventilation/Perfusion SPECT for diagnostics of pulmonary embolism in clinical practice. J Intern Med 2008;264:379-387.
• Gutte H, Mortensen J, Jensen CV, et al. Comparison of V/Q SPECT and planar V/Q lung scintigraphy in diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism. Nucl Med Commun 2010;31:82-86.
• Bajc M, Neilly JB, Miniati M, Schuemichen C, Meignan M, Jonson B. EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy: Part 2. Algorithms and clinical considerations for diagnosis of pulmonary emboli with V/P(SPECT) and MDCT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:1528-1538.
• Mortensen J, Gutte H. SPECT/CT and pulmonary embolism. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;4:S81-90.
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing. NICE Guideline [NG158]. London: NICE; 2020 [updated 2023]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng158.
• Leblanc M, Leveillée F, Turcotte E. Prospective evaluation of the negative predictive value of V/Q SPECT using Technegas. Nucl Med Commun 2007;28:667-672.
• Bajc M, Olsson CG, Olsson B, Palmer J, Jonson B. Diagnostic evaluation of planar and tomographic ventilation/perfusion lung images in patients with suspected pulmonary emboli. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2004;2:249-256.
• Reinartz P, Wildberger JE, Schaefer W, Nowak B, Mahnken AH, Buell U. Tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a comparison between V/Q lung scintigraphy in SPECT technique and multislice spiral CT. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1501-1508.
• Rahmanipour E, Ghorbani M, Sadeghi R, Sadraei N, Borhani A, Mohammadi S, et al. Diagnostic importance of lung perfusion/ventilation scans in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients: systematic review of the literature. Nucl Med Commun 2023;44(3):178-186.
• Karamian F, Nikkhah R, Ghorbani M, et al. How necessary it is to perform a ventilation scan in patients with a history of COVID-19 to rule out pulmonary thromboembolism? Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol 2025;13(1):70-76.