The Influence of Sustainability on Employee’s Commitment, Engagement, Individual Environmental Behavior, Wellbeing and Performance

Abstract

Generally speaking, as the nature of business life some companies can be successful at implementing sustainability, however many others can’t and struggle. The ration behind this may be related with demographic factors and employee's variables. While the benefits of sustainability for the environment and for organizations have been widely documented, there has been relatively little research exploring the influence of sustainability on employee behaviors and outcomes. The research at hands aims to fulfill that need via exploring the link among sustainability and employee commitment, engagement, individual environmental behavior, wellbeing, and performance in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector. By understanding the ways in which sustainability can impact employee behaviors and outcomes, FMCG companies may be better equipped to design and implement sustainable practices that benefit both the environment, their employees, and their organizations. The records submitted in this survey emphasized the cases of firms which have favorably applied sustainability practices. The authors know of no other study dedicated to the investigation of the relation among sustainability and employee commitment, engagement, individual environmental behavior, wellbeing, and performance in the FMCG sector firms performing in a developing country, Türkiye in particular. Among qualitative research methods in-depth interview technique was utilized to gather data from 52 employees working at different eight FMCG local and international companies in Türkiye. The companies were selected due to their strong focus on sustainability and their commitment to implementing environmentally friendly practices. In order to ensure the validity and reliability of the interview form, a pilot interview was conducted on 20 workers, who were selected by random sampling method, and accordingly necessary adjustments were made in the form. The data were evaluated by content analysis method via ATLAS 7.0 software to form general bilateral themes. Lincoln and Guba’s criteria were used for establishing the overall trustworthiness of qualitative research results. The findings of this study suggested that sustainability practices positively impact employee's commitment, engagement, individual environmental behavior, wellbeing, and performance. According to these data employee's commitment, engagement, individual environmental behavior, wellbeing, and performance increased after their corporations started adapting sustainability practices, especially at production department and for non-managerial roles. It had also been determined that as years of work experience and number of children increased workers’ commitment, engagement, individual environmental behavior, wellbeing, and performance also enhanced. In addition, international firms’ sustainability practices were seen more supportive than local ones in terms of commitment, individual environmental behavior, and performance.

Keywords

• Sustainability
• Commitment
• Engagement
• Individual Environmental Behavior
• Wellbeing
• Performance

Sürdürülebilirliğin Çalışan Bağlılığı, Kendilerini İşe Vermeleri, Bireysel Çevresel Davranışları, Refah ve Performansları Üzerindeki Etkisi

Abstract

Genel olarak konuşursak, iş hayatının doğası gereği bazı şirketler sürdürülebilirliği uygulamada başarılı olabilir, ancak birçoğu bunu başaramaz ve zorlanır. Bunun ardındaki neden demografik faktörler ve çalışan değişkenleriyle ilgili olabilir. Sürdürülebilirliğin çevre ve organizasyonlar için faydaları yaygın olarak belgelenmiş olsa da sürdürülebilirliğin çalışan davranışları ve sonuçları üzerindeki etkisini inceleyen nispeten az araştırma yapılmıştır. Eldeki araştırma, sürdürülebilirlik ile çalışan bağlılığı, kendini işe verme, bireysel çevresel davranış, refah ve hızlı tüketim malları (FMCG) sektöründeki performans arasındaki bağlantıyı inceleyerek bu ihtiyacı karşılamayı amaçlamaktadır. Sürdürülebilirliğin çalışan davranışlarını ve sonuçlarını etkileme yollarını anlayarak, FMCG şirketleri çevreye, çalışanlarına ve de aynı zamanda organizasyonlarına fayda sağlayan sürdürülebilirlik uygulamaları tasarlamak ve uygulamak için daha donanımlı olabilirler. Bu ankette sunulan kayıtlar, sürdürülebilirlik uygulamalarını olumlu şekilde uygulayan firmaların durumlarını yansıtmaktadır. Yazarlar, özellikle Türkiye olmak üzere gelişmekte olan bir ülkede faaliyet gösteren FMCG sektörü firmalarında sürdürülebilirlik ile çalışan bağlılığı, kendini işe verme, bireysel çevresel davranış, refah ve performans arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemeye adanmış başka bir çalışma tespit edememiştir. Türkiye'de faaliyet gösteren yerel ve uluslararası sekiz farklı hızlı tüketim malları şirketinde çalışan 52 çalışanın verileri nitel bir araştırma yaklaşımı olan derinlemesine görüşme tekniği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Araştırmaya katılan şirketler, sürdürülebilirliğe güçlü bir şekilde odaklanmaları ve çevre dostu uygulamaları hayata geçirme taahhütleri nedeniyle seçilmiştir. Görüşme formunun geçerliliğini ve güvenilirliğini sağlamak için, rastgele örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen 20 çalışanla pilot görüşme yapılmış ve buna göre formda gerekli düzeltmeler tamamlanmıştır. Veriler, genel ikili temalar oluşturmak için ATLAS 7.0 yazılımı aracılığıyla içerik analizi yöntemi ile test edilmiştir. Nitel araştırma sonuçlarının genel güvenilirliğini belirlemek için Lincoln ve Guba'nın kriterleri kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın bulguları, sürdürülebilirlik uygulamalarının çalışanların bağlılığını, katılımını, bireysel çevresel davranışını, refahını ve performansını olumlu yönde etkilediğini ortaya koymuştur. Bu verilere göre, şirketlerin sürdürülebilirlik uygulamalarını benimsemeye başlamasıyla çalışanların bağlılıklarının, kendilerini işe vermelerinin, bireysel çevresel davranışlarının, refah ve performanslarının özellikle üretim departmanında ve yönetim dışı rollerde arttığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, iş tecrübesi ve çocuk sayısı yükseldikçe bu etkinin arttığı tespit edilmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra bağlılık, bireysel çevresel davranış ve performans açısından uluslararası firmaların sürdürülebilirlik uygulamalarının yerel olanlardan daha fazla destekleyici olduğu görülmüştür.

Keywords

• Sürdürülebilirlik
• Çalışan Bağlılığı
• Kendini İşe Verme
• Bireysel Çevresel Davranışlar
• Refah
• Performans

References

1. Abdurachman, D., Ramdhan, RM., Karsoma A., Kisahwan D., Winarno A., & Hermana D. (2023). Corporate social responsibility: Micro foundation framework for high employee performance in a developing country. Administrative Sciences, 13(8), 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13080186
2. Ahmad, N. & Oranye, N. O. (2010). Empowerment, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: a comparative analysis of nurses working in Malaysia and England. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(5), 582–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01093.x
3. Alzayed, M., Jauhar, J., Mohaidin, Z. & Murshid, M. (2020). Effects of inter-organizational justice on dimensions of organizational citizenship behaviours: a study on Kuwait Ministries’ employees. Management and Labour Studies, 45, 444-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X20939026
4. Andrew, A. (2017). Employees’ commitment and its impact on organizational performance. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 5(2), 1-13, https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEBA/2017/38396
5. Bakker, A.B. & de Vries, J.D. (2021). Job demands–resources theory and self-regulation: new explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety Stress Coping, 34, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695
6. Baltacı, A. (2018). A conceptual review of sampling methods and sample size problems in qualitative research. Journal of Bitlis Eren University Institute of Social Sciences, 7(1), 231-274. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/bitlissos/issue/38061/399955
7. Bansal, P. & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556363
8. Barauskaite, G. & Streimikiene, D. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: the puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2048

9. Bashir, H., Jørgensen, S., Pedersen, L.J.T., & Skard, S. (2020). Experimenting with sustainable business models in fast moving consumer goods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122302
10. Baykal E., & Divrik B. (2023). Employee involvement in sustainability projects in emergent markets: Evidence from Turkey. Sustainability, 15(18), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813929 Bedarkar, M. & Pandita, D. (2014). A study on the drivers of employee engagement impacting employee performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.174
11. Bhandari, P. (2022). What is qualitative research? Methods & examples. Retrieved from: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-research (Accessed: 03.03.2023).
12. Bhattacharya, CB., Sen, S. & Korschun, D. (2011). Leveraging corporate responsibility: The stakeholder route to maximizing business and social value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Boeije H. A. (2002). Purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant, 36(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486
14. Brammer, S., Hoejmose, S. & Marchant, K. (2012). Environmental management in SMEs in the UK: practices, pressures and perceived benefits. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(7), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.717
15. Burdick, R.K. et al. (2017). Analytical Comparability and Similarity. In: Statistical Applications for Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50186-4_9
16. Chang, R.D., Zuo, J. Zhao, Z.Y., Zillante, G., Gan, X.L. & Soebarto, V. (2017). Evolving theories of sustainability and firms: history, future directions and implications for renewable energy research. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.029
17. Choi, Y. & Yanni, Y. (2014). The influence of perceived corporate sustainability practices on employees and organizational performance sustainability. Sustainability, 6, 348-364. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6010348
18. CIPD (2020). Annual report and accounts. Retrieved from: https://www.cipd.co.uk/about/who-we-are/annual-report (Accessed: 09.05.2022).
19. Copper, S. (2022). How sustainability affects employee engagement, satisfaction and trust. Retrieved from: https://mikemcritchie.com/how-sustainability-affects-employee-engagement-satisfaction-and-trust/ (Accessed: 09.01.2022).
20. Costa, C., Breda, Z., Pinho, I., Bakas, F., & Durão, M. (2016). Performing a hematic Analysis: An Exploratory Study about Managers’ Perceptions on Gender Equality. The Qualitative Report, 21(13), 34-47. Retrieved from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol21/iss13/4
21. Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D. & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: a sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 490-506. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1932
22. D'Arco, M., & Marino, V. (2022). Environmental citizenship behavior and sustainability apps: an empirical investigation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 16(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2021-0118
23. Dirani, K. M., & Kuchinke, K. P. (2011). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: validating the Arabic satisfaction and commitment questionnaire (ASCQ), testing the correlations, and investigating the effects of demographic variables in the Lebanese banking sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(5), 1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.556801
24. do Paço, A. & Laurett, R. (2019). Environmental behaviour and sustainable development. in Leal Filho, W. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education. Cham: Springer.
25. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I. & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24550546
26. Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishers.
27. Erbaşı, A., Çalışkan, A., & Akdeniz, G. (2022). The effect of personality traits on green organizational behavior. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 12(2), 154-185. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.903230
28. Flick, U. (2014). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243
29. Gheyle, N., & Jacobs, T. (2017). Content analysis: a short overview. Internal research note, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33689.31841
30. Glavas, A. (2012). Employee engagement and sustainability: a model for implementing meaningfulness at and in work. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 46, 13–29. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/jcorpciti.46.13
31. Guba, E., & Lincoln Y. (1994). Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Harrington, L. M. B. (2016). Sustainability theory and conceptual considerations: a review of key ideas for sustainability, and the rural context. Papers in Applied Geography, 2(4), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222
33. Herbohn, K., Walker, J., & Loo, H. Y. M. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: the link between sustainability disclosure and sustainability performance. ABACUS – A Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies, 50(4), 422-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12036
34. Jiang, P., Dong, H., Zhu, Y., Alimujiang, A., Zhang, Z. & Ma, W. (2018). Individual environmental behavior: a key role in building low-carbon communities in China. Front Energy, 12, 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0566-y
35. Jones, D. A., Willness, C. R., & Madey, S. (2014). Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0848
36. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
37. Kent Business School. (2021). Can sustainability action improve employee wellbeing? Retrieved from: https://blogs.kent.ac.uk/kbs-news-events/2021/11/can-sustainability-action-improve-employee-wellbeing/ (Accessed: 22.09.2021).
38. Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: the centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 44, 87–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.02.002
39. Kong, L., Sial, M. S., Ahmad, N., Sehleanu, M., Li, Z., Zia-Ud-Din, M. & Badulescu, D. (2021). CSR as a potential motivator to shape employees’ view towards nature for a sustainable workplace environment. Sustainability, 13(3), 1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031499
40. KPMG (2017). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting. Retrieved from: https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2017/10/the-kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting2017.html (Accessed: 17.02.2022).
41. Larkins, M., Wright, W., & Dann, S. (2018). Sustainability and engagement: strange bedfellows in the undergraduate textbook. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(6), 1053-1074. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2017-0152
42. Li, D., Huang, M., Ren, S., Chen, X., & Ning, L. (2018). Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 1089-1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3187-6
43. Li, D., Zhao, L., Ma, S., Shao, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.
44. Marcus, A., & Gopinath, N.M. (2017). Impact of the demographic variables on the employee engagement - an analysis. ICTACT Journal on Management Studies, 3(2), 502-510. https://doi.org/10.21917/ijms.2017.0068
45. Mendes, T., & Pereira, L., Gonçalves, R., Dias, Á., & Costa, R. (2022). Sustainable practices impacting employee engagement and well-being. Progress in Industrial Ecology, An International Journal. 15. 239. https://doi.org/10.1504/PIE.2022.125618.
46. Mercurio, Z. A. (2015). Affective commitment as a core essence of organizational commitment an integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 14(4), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315603612
47. Merriman, K.K., Sen S., Felo A.J., & Litzky, B.E. (2016). Employees and sustainability: the role of incentives. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(4), 820-836. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2014-0285
48. Merriman, K.K., & Sen, S. (2012). Incenting managers towards the triple bottom line: an agency and social norm perspective. Human Resource Management, 51(6), 851-872. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1790622
49. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
50. Meyer, J. P., Srinivas, E. S., Lal, J. B., & Topolnytsky, L. (2007). Employee commitment and support for an organizational change: test of the three-component model in two cultures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X118685
51. Mowday, R, Porter, L., & Steers, R. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: the psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. London: Academic Press.
52. Nellist, G. (2022). By looking to nature, health products manufacturer Melaleuca is breaking barriers. Retrieved from: https://www.digitaljournal.com/business/by-looking-to-nature-health-products-manufacturer-melaleuca-is-breaking-barriers/article (Accessed: 17.02.2022).
53. Neuman, W. L., & Robson, K. (2014). Basics of social research. Toronto: Pearson Canada.
54. Norton, T.A., Zacher, H., & Ashkanasy, N.M. (2014). Organizational sustainability policies and employee green behavior: the mediating role of work climate perception. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.008
55. P.M, N., Jose, G., Vincent, M.T., & John, A. (2022). Workplace bullying, engagement and employability: moderating role of organization‑based self‑esteem. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-022-09420-7
56. Polman, P., & Bhattacharya, C.B. (2016). Engaging employees to create a sustainable business. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 14(4), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.48558/30F3-S174
57. Prashar, A. (2022). Supply chain sustainability drivers for fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector: an Indian perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2021-0582
58. Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
59. Robertson, I.T., & Cooper, C.L. (2015). Personnel psychology and human resources management: a reader for students and practitioners. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-119-09060-1.
60. Sahni, J. (2021). Employee engagement among millennial workforce: empirical study on selected antecedents and consequences. SAGE Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211002208
61. Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E.G. (2012). Business cases for sustainability: the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95-119. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2012.046944
62. Shabbir, M. S., & Wisdom, O. (2020). The relationship between corporate social responsibility, environmental investments and financial performance: evidence from manufacturing companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10217-0
63. Showkat, N., & Parveen, H. (2017). In-depth interview. Communications Research, 2(30), 1-9.
64. Sia, J. Y. (2012). A survey of factors influencing employee engagement. (MBA Thesis), UniversitiSains, Malaysia.
65. Silic, M., Marzi, G., Caputo, A., & Bal, P. M. (April 2020). The effects of a gamified human resource management system on job satisfaction and engagement. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12272. ISSN 0954-5395
66. Song, W., Wang, G.‐Z., & Ma, X. (2020). Environmental innovation practices and green product innovation performance: a perspective from organizational climate. Sustainable Development, 28, 224-234. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1990
67. Stanford Libraries. (2022). Qualitative research. Retrieved from: https://guides.library.stanford.edu/qualitative_research (Accessed: 17.02.2023).
68. Stoll-Kleemann, S., & O’riordan, T. (2015). The sustainability challenges of our meat and dairy diets. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 57, 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2015.1025644
69. Sutton, A., & Atkinson, C. (2023). Performance at the cost of well-being? Testing the multi-level effects of HR practices on organizational performance via employee experiences and well-being. Evidence-based HRM, 11. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-12-2022-0299
70. Tschelisnig, G., & Westerlaken, R. (2022). The impact of sustainability at the workplace on the employee’s motivation and satisfaction. Research in Hospitality Management, 12(2), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/22243534.2022.2133179
71. van Valkengoed, A.M., Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2022). To select effective interventions for pro-environmental behaviour change, we need to consider determinants of behaviour. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 1482–1492. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01473-w
72. Vitolla, F., Rubino, M., & Garzoni, A. (2017). The integration of CSR into strategic management: A dynamic approach based on social management philosophy. Corporate Governance, 17(1), 89-116. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2016-0064
73. Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: a firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1553-1560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.017
74. Wang, Z., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1607-1616, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142
75. WHO, (2018). World health statistics 2018: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. Retrieved from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272596 (Accessed: 17.02.2023).
76. Wikipedia. (2022). Corporate sustainability. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_sustainability (Accessed: 12.12.2022).
77. Wikipedia. (2002). Fast-moving consumer goods. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast-moving_consumer_goods#cite_ref-3 (Accessed: 09.01.2023).
78. Wikipedia. (2023). Employee Engagement. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee engagement (Accessed: 22.04.2023).
79. Wong, F. Y., Ho, J., & Azahari, A.R. (2016). The influence of sustainable organization practices and employee well-being on turnover intention. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24, 47-62.
80. Yılmaz, H. (2021). Management practices for business continuity during the Covid-19 pandemic period. in S. Yılmaz (Ed.) Contemporary Business Issues, Ankara: Akademisyen Publishing House.
81. Yılmaz, H. (2023). The effect of sustainable innovation performance and business continuity planning of large scale firms on corporate sustainability. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1), 405-420, https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1216495
82. Yunis M.S., Jamali D., & Hashim H. (2018). Corporate social responsibility of foreign multinationals in a developing country context: insights from Pakistan. Sustainability, 10(10), 3511. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103511
83. Zeng, S. X., Meng, X. H., Yin, H. T., Tam, C. M., & Sun, L. (2010). Impact of Cleaner Production on Business Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 975-983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.019