Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

DAVID RICARDO İLE JOSEPH ALOIS SCHUMPETER’İN TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME KURAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 15 - 40, 28.03.2014

Hakan Ardor Serdar Varlık

Öz

Bu çalışmada teknolojik gelişmeyi, makine kullanımı biçiminde ele alan David Ricardo ile icat, yenilik, yenilik kümelenmesi ve yaratıcı yıkım süreci içerisinde değerlendiren Joseph Alois Schumpeter’in teknolojik gelişme kuramları, karşılaştırmalı bir biçimde incelenmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında Ricardo ve Schumpeter’in teknolojik gelişme kuramları arasında teknolojik gelişme algıları ve kuramsal amaçları bakımından bir takım farklılıklar olduğu belirlenmiştir. Buna karşın, bu iki yazarın teknolojik gelişme kuramları arasında kavramsal düzeyde bir takım benzerlikler olduğu da saptanmıştır. İcat ve yenilik kavramları Schumpeter tarafından kullanılmasına karşın, kavramın izleri Schumpeter’den önce Ricardo’da görülmektedir. Ricardo, Schumpeter’den daha önce icat ile yeniliğin birbirinden farklı kavramlar olduğunun farkına varmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teknolojik Gelişme Makine Kullanımı İcat-Yenilik-Yenilik Kümelenmesi Iş Çevrimleri Yaratıcı Yıkım

Kaynakça

  • AKYÜZ, Yılmaz. (1977), Sermaye, Bölüşüm, Büyüme, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara.
  • ANDERSEN, S. Esben. (2006), “The Limits of Schumpeter's Business Cycle”, Industry and Innovation, Vel.13,No.l, (March) pp.107—116
  • BARK)“, Haim. (1986), “Ricardo's Volts-Face en Machinery", Thejoumal tıfPolı'ritaı' Economy, Vol. 94, No. 3,Partl Üune),pp. 595—613.
  • BEACH [, F. Earl. (1971), “I [ieks cın Ricardo on Machinery”, 'Hıf Beonomı'ejoumal, Vol. 81, No. 324 (December), pp. 916—922
  • I Mi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstilürü Dergisi Cilt 2, Sayı 3, Aralık 2009
  • David Ricardo ile Joseph Alois Schumpeter'in Teknolojik Gelişme Kuramlarmm Korşıloştınlması
  • BLAUG, Mark. (1958) , RicardianEconomics:A Historical Study, Yale University Press, New l Iaven.
  • BROUWER, Maria. (1991), Schnmpeierian Puzzles: Technological Competition and Economic Evolution, The University of'Michigan Press, USA.
  • CLENLENCE, Richard ve FRANCIS S. Doody. (1950), The Schumpeterian System, Addison—Wesley Press,USA.
  • DAVISJB. (1991), “Distribution in Ricardo's Machinery Chapter", David Ricardo CriticalAîsccomenis, (Ed) John Cunningham Wood, Vol .7, Routledge, London, pp. 256—280.
  • FREEMAN, Chris ve SOE'I'lğ, Lue. (2003), Yenilik iktisadi, (çev. Ergun Türkcan), Tübitak Yayınları, Ankara.
  • GEI IRKE, Christian. (2003), “The Ricardo Effect: Its Meaning and Validity”, Economica, New Series, Vol, 70, N0. 277' (February), pp. 143—158.
  • HANSEN, H_ Alvin. (1951), “Schumpeter's Contribution to Business Cycle Theory", The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 33, No. 2 (May), pp. 129—132.
  • HAYEK, A. v. F. (1942), “The RieardoEffeet”,Economica, New Series, Vol. 9, No. 34, (May), pp. 127—152.
  • HAYEK, AMP, (1969), “Three Elucidations ofthe Ricardo Effect”, Thejaurnal ofPoliticol Economy, Vol. 77, No. 2,pp. 274—285
  • llOLLAN DER, Samuel. (1966), “Some Technological Relationships in the Wealth of Nations and Ricardo's Principles”, The Canadian journal cfEccınomics and Political Science, Vol. 32, No. 2 (May), pp. 184—201
  • llOLLANDER, Samuel. (1991), “The Development ofRieardo‘s I’ositioan on Machinery”, David Ricardo Critical Assessments, (Ed.)john Cunningham Wood)/ol. 2, Routledge, London, pp. 113-135.
  • IIUMPI LERY, M. Thomas. (2004), “Ricardo Versus Wicksell on Job Losses and Technological Change", Federal Reserve Banla of Richmond Economic Quarterly, Vol. 90, No. 4 (Fall).
  • jONUNG, Lars. (1981), “ Ricardo on Machinery and the Present Unemployment: An Unpublished Manuscript by KnutVVicksell”, The Economicjovmal, Vol. 91, No. 361 (March), pp. 195—198.
  • KURZ, D.II. (1991), “Ricardo and Lowe on Machinery”, David Ricardo Critical Assessments, (Ed.) John Cunningham Wood, Vol. 6, Routledge, London, pp. 88-1 10.
  • MADARASZ, A. (1991), “Schumpeter‘s Theory of Economic Development”, Joseph A. Schumpeter Critical Assessments, (Ed.)_]ohn Cunningham Wood, Vol. 3, Routledge, London.
  • MAHAJAN, V.S. (1 991 ), “SCl-ıurnpetcr's Theory ol' Growth" , JToseph A. Schumpeler Critical Assessments, (Ed) John Cunningham Wood, Vol. 2, Routledge, London.
  • MAI'FAL Shlomo ve llASWELL, Patricia. (1977), “Why Did Ricardo (Not) Change ilis Mind? On Money and Machinery”, Hcanomica, Vol.44, No,176, (November), 1311359668.
  • MCNULTY, J. P. (1991), “On Firm Size and Innovation in the Schuınpeterian System”, Joseph A. Sch-ampeter Critical Assessments, (Ed) John Cunningham Wood, Vol. 3, Routledge, London, pp.?7-83.
  • MORISI HMA, Miehio. (1989) ,Ricardo's Economics :A General Equilibrium Theory ojDisirilıntionAnd Growth, Cambridge University Press, NewYork.
  • PAL, S. (1991), “Schumpetcr and his ideas on Economic Development", joseph A. Schumpeter Critical Assessments, (Ed.)John CunninglıamWood,Vol. 2, Routledge, London, pp.76—89.
  • PARELMAN, Michael. (1995), “Retrospectives: Sehumpeter, David Wells, and Creative Destruction”, Thejonrnol ochonomic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 3 (Summer), pp. 189—197.
  • RICARDO, David. (2007), Ekonomi Politiğin ve Vergilendirmenin İlkeleri, (çev. Tayfun Ertan), BelgeYayinlari, lstanbul.
  • Hint Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Cilt 2, Sayı 1, Aralık 2009
  • ROSENBERG, N. ve PRISCI ITAK, RC. ( 1991), “Technological Innovation and Long Waves”, joseph A. Schampeter Critical Assessments, (Ed.) john Cunningham Wood, Vol, 4, Routledge, London, pp.223-246.
  • RUTTAN, W Vernon. (1959), “Usher and Sehumpeter on Invention, Innovation, and Technological Change ”, 'I he QuarterlyjoamaiofŞconomics, Vol. 73, No. 4 (November), pp. 596—606.
  • SAMUELSON, A. Paul. (1988), “Mathematical Vindication of Ricardo on Machinery”, Thefoamal of PoiitiralEronomŞ Vol. 96, No. 2 (April), pp. 274—282.
  • SAMUELSON, A. Paul. (1989), “Ricardo Was Right”, ScandjoamaiofŞtonomics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 47—62.
  • SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph, (1927), “The Explanation of the Business Cycle”, Economics;, No. 21 (December), pp. 286—311.
  • SCI lUMPE'l'ER, A.]oseph. (1928), “The Instability ofCapitaIism”, Iheşronomirjoamai, Vol. 38, No. 151 (September), pp. 361-386.
  • SCI IUMPETER, A. Joseph. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, McGraw—I IiII Book Company, NewYork.
  • SCHUMPETER, A.]oseph. (1947:a), “The Creative Response in Economic History",]aama1owanomir History, (November), pp. 149—159.
  • SCI lUMPE'l'ER, A. Joseph. (1947:b), “Theoretical Problems: Theoretical Problems of Economic Growth”, The journal of Economic History, Vol. 7, (Supplement: Economic Growth: A Symposium), pp. 1—9.
  • SCI lUMPE'l'ER, A. Joseph. (1961), 'I he 'I henry qu-Ieanamic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Interest, and the Business Cycyle, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.
  • SCI IUMPETER, A.]oseph. (1968) , Kapitalizm, Sosyalizm ve Demokrasi, VarlilcYayinlari, İstanbul.
  • SCI lUMPE'l'ER, A.]oseph. (1986) , I Iistmy ofEcoaomieAaalysis, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • SCHUMPETER. A. Joseph. (2005), “Development”, journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 43 (March), pp.108—120.
  • SI IIELDS, P. Michael. (1989), “'I‘he Machinery Question: Can ”Technological Improvements Reduce Real Output”, Economics;, New Series, Vol. 56, No, 222, (May), pp. 215-224.
  • SOLO, S. Carolyn. (1951), “Innovation in the Capitalist Process: A Critique of the Schumpeterian rI'heory”, The Quarteriyjoamalofbronomics, Vol. 65, No. 3 (August), pp. 417—428.
  • SRAFFA, Piero. (1973), “The Marks And Correspondence of David Ricardo; letters 1816-1818”, (Ed.) Piero Sraffa, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 7.
  • SRAFEA, Piero. (1973), “The Works And Correspondence of David Ricardo; Letters 1819—June1821”, (Ed.) Piero Srafl'a, Cambridge University Press, Vol, 7.
  • STOLPER, F. Wolfgang. (1951), “The Schumpeterian System”, Wiefoarnal ofEronomir History, Vol. 11, No. 3, Part1 (Summer), pp. 272—277.
  • SWEEZY, M. Paul. (1943), “Professor Schıımpeter's Theory of Innovation", The Review of Economics aml Statistics, Vol. 25, No. 1 (February), pp. 93—96.
  • UCI IIYAMA, 'lhkashi. (2000), “Ricardo on machinery: a dynamic analysis”, European journal quIistory of Economic Thought, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp, 208—227.
  • WARBURTON, Clark. (1953), “Money and Business Fluctuations in the Schumpeterian System”, The journalquoliticalLîconomy, Vol. 61, No. 6 (December), pp. 509—522.
  • Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstiliisii Dergisi Cil 2, Sayı 1, Aralık 2009

DAVID RICARDO İLE JOSEPH ALOIS SCHUMPETER’İN TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME KURAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 15 - 40, 28.03.2014

Hakan Ardor Serdar Varlık

Öz

Kaynakça

  • AKYÜZ, Yılmaz. (1977), Sermaye, Bölüşüm, Büyüme, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara.
  • ANDERSEN, S. Esben. (2006), “The Limits of Schumpeter's Business Cycle”, Industry and Innovation, Vel.13,No.l, (March) pp.107—116
  • BARK)“, Haim. (1986), “Ricardo's Volts-Face en Machinery", Thejoumal tıfPolı'ritaı' Economy, Vol. 94, No. 3,Partl Üune),pp. 595—613.
  • BEACH [, F. Earl. (1971), “I [ieks cın Ricardo on Machinery”, 'Hıf Beonomı'ejoumal, Vol. 81, No. 324 (December), pp. 916—922
  • I Mi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstilürü Dergisi Cilt 2, Sayı 3, Aralık 2009
  • David Ricardo ile Joseph Alois Schumpeter'in Teknolojik Gelişme Kuramlarmm Korşıloştınlması
  • BLAUG, Mark. (1958) , RicardianEconomics:A Historical Study, Yale University Press, New l Iaven.
  • BROUWER, Maria. (1991), Schnmpeierian Puzzles: Technological Competition and Economic Evolution, The University of'Michigan Press, USA.
  • CLENLENCE, Richard ve FRANCIS S. Doody. (1950), The Schumpeterian System, Addison—Wesley Press,USA.
  • DAVISJB. (1991), “Distribution in Ricardo's Machinery Chapter", David Ricardo CriticalAîsccomenis, (Ed) John Cunningham Wood, Vol .7, Routledge, London, pp. 256—280.
  • FREEMAN, Chris ve SOE'I'lğ, Lue. (2003), Yenilik iktisadi, (çev. Ergun Türkcan), Tübitak Yayınları, Ankara.
  • GEI IRKE, Christian. (2003), “The Ricardo Effect: Its Meaning and Validity”, Economica, New Series, Vol, 70, N0. 277' (February), pp. 143—158.
  • HANSEN, H_ Alvin. (1951), “Schumpeter's Contribution to Business Cycle Theory", The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 33, No. 2 (May), pp. 129—132.
  • HAYEK, A. v. F. (1942), “The RieardoEffeet”,Economica, New Series, Vol. 9, No. 34, (May), pp. 127—152.
  • HAYEK, AMP, (1969), “Three Elucidations ofthe Ricardo Effect”, Thejaurnal ofPoliticol Economy, Vol. 77, No. 2,pp. 274—285
  • llOLLAN DER, Samuel. (1966), “Some Technological Relationships in the Wealth of Nations and Ricardo's Principles”, The Canadian journal cfEccınomics and Political Science, Vol. 32, No. 2 (May), pp. 184—201
  • llOLLANDER, Samuel. (1991), “The Development ofRieardo‘s I’ositioan on Machinery”, David Ricardo Critical Assessments, (Ed.)john Cunningham Wood)/ol. 2, Routledge, London, pp. 113-135.
  • IIUMPI LERY, M. Thomas. (2004), “Ricardo Versus Wicksell on Job Losses and Technological Change", Federal Reserve Banla of Richmond Economic Quarterly, Vol. 90, No. 4 (Fall).
  • jONUNG, Lars. (1981), “ Ricardo on Machinery and the Present Unemployment: An Unpublished Manuscript by KnutVVicksell”, The Economicjovmal, Vol. 91, No. 361 (March), pp. 195—198.
  • KURZ, D.II. (1991), “Ricardo and Lowe on Machinery”, David Ricardo Critical Assessments, (Ed.) John Cunningham Wood, Vol. 6, Routledge, London, pp. 88-1 10.
  • MADARASZ, A. (1991), “Schumpeter‘s Theory of Economic Development”, Joseph A. Schumpeter Critical Assessments, (Ed.)_]ohn Cunningham Wood, Vol. 3, Routledge, London.
  • MAHAJAN, V.S. (1 991 ), “SCl-ıurnpetcr's Theory ol' Growth" , JToseph A. Schumpeler Critical Assessments, (Ed) John Cunningham Wood, Vol. 2, Routledge, London.
  • MAI'FAL Shlomo ve llASWELL, Patricia. (1977), “Why Did Ricardo (Not) Change ilis Mind? On Money and Machinery”, Hcanomica, Vol.44, No,176, (November), 1311359668.
  • MCNULTY, J. P. (1991), “On Firm Size and Innovation in the Schuınpeterian System”, Joseph A. Sch-ampeter Critical Assessments, (Ed) John Cunningham Wood, Vol. 3, Routledge, London, pp.?7-83.
  • MORISI HMA, Miehio. (1989) ,Ricardo's Economics :A General Equilibrium Theory ojDisirilıntionAnd Growth, Cambridge University Press, NewYork.
  • PAL, S. (1991), “Schumpetcr and his ideas on Economic Development", joseph A. Schumpeter Critical Assessments, (Ed.)John CunninglıamWood,Vol. 2, Routledge, London, pp.76—89.
  • PARELMAN, Michael. (1995), “Retrospectives: Sehumpeter, David Wells, and Creative Destruction”, Thejonrnol ochonomic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 3 (Summer), pp. 189—197.
  • RICARDO, David. (2007), Ekonomi Politiğin ve Vergilendirmenin İlkeleri, (çev. Tayfun Ertan), BelgeYayinlari, lstanbul.
  • Hint Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Cilt 2, Sayı 1, Aralık 2009
  • ROSENBERG, N. ve PRISCI ITAK, RC. ( 1991), “Technological Innovation and Long Waves”, joseph A. Schampeter Critical Assessments, (Ed.) john Cunningham Wood, Vol, 4, Routledge, London, pp.223-246.
  • RUTTAN, W Vernon. (1959), “Usher and Sehumpeter on Invention, Innovation, and Technological Change ”, 'I he QuarterlyjoamaiofŞconomics, Vol. 73, No. 4 (November), pp. 596—606.
  • SAMUELSON, A. Paul. (1988), “Mathematical Vindication of Ricardo on Machinery”, Thefoamal of PoiitiralEronomŞ Vol. 96, No. 2 (April), pp. 274—282.
  • SAMUELSON, A. Paul. (1989), “Ricardo Was Right”, ScandjoamaiofŞtonomics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 47—62.
  • SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph, (1927), “The Explanation of the Business Cycle”, Economics;, No. 21 (December), pp. 286—311.
  • SCI lUMPE'l'ER, A.]oseph. (1928), “The Instability ofCapitaIism”, Iheşronomirjoamai, Vol. 38, No. 151 (September), pp. 361-386.
  • SCI IUMPETER, A. Joseph. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, McGraw—I IiII Book Company, NewYork.
  • SCHUMPETER, A.]oseph. (1947:a), “The Creative Response in Economic History",]aama1owanomir History, (November), pp. 149—159.
  • SCI lUMPE'l'ER, A. Joseph. (1947:b), “Theoretical Problems: Theoretical Problems of Economic Growth”, The journal of Economic History, Vol. 7, (Supplement: Economic Growth: A Symposium), pp. 1—9.
  • SCI lUMPE'l'ER, A. Joseph. (1961), 'I he 'I henry qu-Ieanamic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Interest, and the Business Cycyle, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.
  • SCI IUMPETER, A.]oseph. (1968) , Kapitalizm, Sosyalizm ve Demokrasi, VarlilcYayinlari, İstanbul.
  • SCI lUMPE'l'ER, A.]oseph. (1986) , I Iistmy ofEcoaomieAaalysis, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • SCHUMPETER. A. Joseph. (2005), “Development”, journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 43 (March), pp.108—120.
  • SI IIELDS, P. Michael. (1989), “'I‘he Machinery Question: Can ”Technological Improvements Reduce Real Output”, Economics;, New Series, Vol. 56, No, 222, (May), pp. 215-224.
  • SOLO, S. Carolyn. (1951), “Innovation in the Capitalist Process: A Critique of the Schumpeterian rI'heory”, The Quarteriyjoamalofbronomics, Vol. 65, No. 3 (August), pp. 417—428.
  • SRAFFA, Piero. (1973), “The Marks And Correspondence of David Ricardo; letters 1816-1818”, (Ed.) Piero Sraffa, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 7.
  • SRAFEA, Piero. (1973), “The Works And Correspondence of David Ricardo; Letters 1819—June1821”, (Ed.) Piero Srafl'a, Cambridge University Press, Vol, 7.
  • STOLPER, F. Wolfgang. (1951), “The Schumpeterian System”, Wiefoarnal ofEronomir History, Vol. 11, No. 3, Part1 (Summer), pp. 272—277.
  • SWEEZY, M. Paul. (1943), “Professor Schıımpeter's Theory of Innovation", The Review of Economics aml Statistics, Vol. 25, No. 1 (February), pp. 93—96.
  • UCI IIYAMA, 'lhkashi. (2000), “Ricardo on machinery: a dynamic analysis”, European journal quIistory of Economic Thought, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp, 208—227.
  • WARBURTON, Clark. (1953), “Money and Business Fluctuations in the Schumpeterian System”, The journalquoliticalLîconomy, Vol. 61, No. 6 (December), pp. 509—522.
  • Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstiliisii Dergisi Cil 2, Sayı 1, Aralık 2009
Toplam 51 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Hakan Ardor Bu kişi benim

Serdar Varlık Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Mart 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2009 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Ardor, H., & Varlık, S. (2014). DAVID RICARDO İLE JOSEPH ALOIS SCHUMPETER’İN TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME KURAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(2), 15-40.
AMA Ardor H, Varlık S. DAVID RICARDO İLE JOSEPH ALOIS SCHUMPETER’İN TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME KURAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. hititsosbil. Mart 2014;2(2):15-40.
Chicago Ardor, Hakan, ve Serdar Varlık. “DAVID RICARDO İLE JOSEPH ALOIS SCHUMPETER’İN TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME KURAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2, sy. 2 (Mart 2014): 15-40.
EndNote Ardor H, Varlık S (01 Mart 2014) DAVID RICARDO İLE JOSEPH ALOIS SCHUMPETER’İN TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME KURAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2 2 15–40.
IEEE H. Ardor ve S. Varlık, “DAVID RICARDO İLE JOSEPH ALOIS SCHUMPETER’İN TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME KURAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, hititsosbil, c. 2, sy. 2, ss. 15–40, 2014.
ISNAD Ardor, Hakan - Varlık, Serdar. “DAVID RICARDO İLE JOSEPH ALOIS SCHUMPETER’İN TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME KURAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2/2 (Mart 2014), 15-40.
JAMA Ardor H, Varlık S. DAVID RICARDO İLE JOSEPH ALOIS SCHUMPETER’İN TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME KURAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. hititsosbil. 2014;2:15–40.
MLA Ardor, Hakan ve Serdar Varlık. “DAVID RICARDO İLE JOSEPH ALOIS SCHUMPETER’İN TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME KURAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 2, sy. 2, 2014, ss. 15-40.
Vancouver Ardor H, Varlık S. DAVID RICARDO İLE JOSEPH ALOIS SCHUMPETER’İN TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME KURAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. hititsosbil. 2014;2(2):15-40.