BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2015, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 225 - 233, 23.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.17218/husbed.23492

Abstract

The aim of this descriptive study is to determine relation between learning styles, learning methods and academic achievement of university students. This study was conducted in 2014 and the sample was consisted of 130 university students training in second and forth levels from School of Health. We used Turkish version of VARK scale for determining learning styles. In this study, 60.0% of the students were using of multimodal and 40.0% were using unimodal learning styles. The kinesthetic modal was the most preferred among the unimodal learning styles. We found that the usage of visual and auditory learning styles was very low despite the content of nursing education programs. Nursing programs necessitate skills on problem solving in clinical education from first to fourth years which were based on patient education, treatment and care. Therefore academicians in nursing schools should encourage to students using active learning styles

References

  • ALKHASAWEH, I.M., Mrayyan, M.T., Docherty, C., Alashram, S., Yosef, H. (2008). Problem-Based Learning (PBL): Assessing Students’ Learning Preferences Using VARK. Nurse Education Today, 28, 572-579.
  • ARSAL, Z.,& Ozen, R. (2007). Examining the Learning Strategies and Learning Style Preferences of Candidate Classroom Teachers. Journal of Abant Izzet Baysal University Faculty of Education, 7 (2), 151-164.
  • BAYKAN, Z., & Nacar M. (2007). Learning Styles of First-Year Medical Students Attending Erciyes University in Kayseri, Turkey. Adv Physiol Educ, 31, 158–160.
  • COLLINS, J. (2004). Education Techniques for Lifelong Learning: Principles of Adult Learning. Radiographics, 24(5), 1483-1489.
  • CORTRIGHT, R.N., Collins, H.L., DiCarlo, S.E. (2005). Peer Instruction Enhanced Meaningful Learning: Ability to Solve Novel Problems. Adv Physiol Educ, 29, 107– 111.
  • FLEMING, N. (2007), VARK: A Guide to Learning Styles (online), (erişim adresi: http:// www.vark-learn.com/english/page.Asp? p=questionnaire), (erişim tarihi: 12 March 2014].
  • FLEMING, N.D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection. To Improve Acad, 11, 137-155.
  • JOHNSON, M. (2009). Evaluation of Learning Style for First Year Medical Students. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1),1-5.
  • KHARB, P., Samanta, P.P., Jindal, M., Singh, V. (2013). The Learning Styles and the Preferred Teaching–learning Strategies of First Year Medical Students. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 7(6), 1089-1092.
  • LUJAN, L.H., & Dicarlo, S.E. (2006). Too Much Teaching, Not Enough Learning: What Is The Solution? Adv Physiol Educ, 30, 17–22.
  • NUZHAT, A., Salem, R.O., Mohammed, S.A., Nasir, A.H. (2011). Learning Style Preferences of Medical Students: A Single-Institute Experience From Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Edu, 2, 70-73.
  • OKUR, M., Bahar, H.H., Akgun, L., Bekdemir, M. (2011). Department of Mathematics Students’ Learning Styles, States of Trait Anxiety and Academic Success. Journal of Turkey Social Research, 15 (3), 123-134.
  • SHAH, C., Joshi, N., Mehta, H.B., Gokhle, P.A. (2011). Learning Styles Adopted ByMedical Students. IJRP, 227-229.
  • TUYSUZ, C., & Tatar, E. (2008). Effect of the Pre-service Teachers’ Learning Styles on Chemistry Achievement and Attitudes. Journal of Mustafa Kemal University Social Science Institution, 5(9), 97-101.

RELATION BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES, METHODS FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS OF TURKISH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Year 2015, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 225 - 233, 23.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.17218/husbed.23492

Abstract

The aim of this descriptive study is to determine relation between learning
styles, learning methods and academic achievement of university students. This
study was conducted in 2014 and the sample was consisted of 130 university
students training in second and forth levels from School of Health. We used Turkish
version of VARK scale for determining learning styles. In this study, 60.0% of the
students were using of multimodal and 40.0% were using unimodal learning styles.
The kinesthetic modal was the most preferred among the unimodal learning styles.
We found that the usage of visual and auditory learning styles was very low despite
the content of nursing education programs. Nursing programs necessitate skills on
problem solving in clinical education from first to fourth years which were based on
patient education, treatment and care. Therefore academicians in nursing schools
should encourage to students using active learning styles.

References

  • ALKHASAWEH, I.M., Mrayyan, M.T., Docherty, C., Alashram, S., Yosef, H. (2008). Problem-Based Learning (PBL): Assessing Students’ Learning Preferences Using VARK. Nurse Education Today, 28, 572-579.
  • ARSAL, Z.,& Ozen, R. (2007). Examining the Learning Strategies and Learning Style Preferences of Candidate Classroom Teachers. Journal of Abant Izzet Baysal University Faculty of Education, 7 (2), 151-164.
  • BAYKAN, Z., & Nacar M. (2007). Learning Styles of First-Year Medical Students Attending Erciyes University in Kayseri, Turkey. Adv Physiol Educ, 31, 158–160.
  • COLLINS, J. (2004). Education Techniques for Lifelong Learning: Principles of Adult Learning. Radiographics, 24(5), 1483-1489.
  • CORTRIGHT, R.N., Collins, H.L., DiCarlo, S.E. (2005). Peer Instruction Enhanced Meaningful Learning: Ability to Solve Novel Problems. Adv Physiol Educ, 29, 107– 111.
  • FLEMING, N. (2007), VARK: A Guide to Learning Styles (online), (erişim adresi: http:// www.vark-learn.com/english/page.Asp? p=questionnaire), (erişim tarihi: 12 March 2014].
  • FLEMING, N.D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection. To Improve Acad, 11, 137-155.
  • JOHNSON, M. (2009). Evaluation of Learning Style for First Year Medical Students. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1),1-5.
  • KHARB, P., Samanta, P.P., Jindal, M., Singh, V. (2013). The Learning Styles and the Preferred Teaching–learning Strategies of First Year Medical Students. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 7(6), 1089-1092.
  • LUJAN, L.H., & Dicarlo, S.E. (2006). Too Much Teaching, Not Enough Learning: What Is The Solution? Adv Physiol Educ, 30, 17–22.
  • NUZHAT, A., Salem, R.O., Mohammed, S.A., Nasir, A.H. (2011). Learning Style Preferences of Medical Students: A Single-Institute Experience From Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Edu, 2, 70-73.
  • OKUR, M., Bahar, H.H., Akgun, L., Bekdemir, M. (2011). Department of Mathematics Students’ Learning Styles, States of Trait Anxiety and Academic Success. Journal of Turkey Social Research, 15 (3), 123-134.
  • SHAH, C., Joshi, N., Mehta, H.B., Gokhle, P.A. (2011). Learning Styles Adopted ByMedical Students. IJRP, 227-229.
  • TUYSUZ, C., & Tatar, E. (2008). Effect of the Pre-service Teachers’ Learning Styles on Chemistry Achievement and Attitudes. Journal of Mustafa Kemal University Social Science Institution, 5(9), 97-101.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Gülay Yılmazel

Nuriye Büyükkayacı Duman

Ayşe Başçı This is me

Publication Date July 23, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yılmazel, G., Büyükkayacı Duman, N., & Başçı, A. (2015). RELATION BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES, METHODS FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS OF TURKISH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(1), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.17218/husbed.23492
AMA Yılmazel G, Büyükkayacı Duman N, Başçı A. RELATION BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES, METHODS FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS OF TURKISH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. hititsosbil. July 2015;8(1):225-233. doi:10.17218/husbed.23492
Chicago Yılmazel, Gülay, Nuriye Büyükkayacı Duman, and Ayşe Başçı. “RELATION BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES, METHODS FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS OF TURKISH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS”. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 8, no. 1 (July 2015): 225-33. https://doi.org/10.17218/husbed.23492.
EndNote Yılmazel G, Büyükkayacı Duman N, Başçı A (July 1, 2015) RELATION BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES, METHODS FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS OF TURKISH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 8 1 225–233.
IEEE G. Yılmazel, N. Büyükkayacı Duman, and A. Başçı, “RELATION BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES, METHODS FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS OF TURKISH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS”, hititsosbil, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 225–233, 2015, doi: 10.17218/husbed.23492.
ISNAD Yılmazel, Gülay et al. “RELATION BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES, METHODS FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS OF TURKISH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS”. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 8/1 (July 2015), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.17218/husbed.23492.
JAMA Yılmazel G, Büyükkayacı Duman N, Başçı A. RELATION BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES, METHODS FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS OF TURKISH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. hititsosbil. 2015;8:225–233.
MLA Yılmazel, Gülay et al. “RELATION BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES, METHODS FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS OF TURKISH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS”. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 1, 2015, pp. 225-33, doi:10.17218/husbed.23492.
Vancouver Yılmazel G, Büyükkayacı Duman N, Başçı A. RELATION BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES, METHODS FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS OF TURKISH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. hititsosbil. 2015;8(1):225-33.