Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Green Hospital Certification Systems

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 161 - 169, 10.02.2019
https://doi.org/10.17681/hsp.394880

Abstract

Hospitals are structures
where the use of energy and resources that affect both the environment and
human health are intense. In particular, the health sector accounts for about
25% of the total carbon emissions of the community by itself and produces large
quantities of toxic, harmful substances and contaminated water. Thinking of
bringing hospitals out of this situation and making them more beneficial to the
environment and human health have provided the emergence of the green hospital
concept. In other words, the green hospital has referred to hospitals that use
less energy, produce less waste, use more recyclable materials and become
healthier organisations on this count. As green hospitals become widespread
throughout the world, knowing how hospitals meet the requirements for green
hospital has led to the emergence of green hospital certification systems. These
certification systems assess hospitals in various areas and score points and
certify to hospitals at different levels according to their scores. Hospitals
having these certifications gain better patient outcomes, patient / employee
safety and satisfaction, cost savings and productivity increase. In this
respect, this study will focus on BREEAM for Healthcare, LEED for Healthcare,
and Australian Green Star certification systems that are the most commonly used
green hospital certification systems worldwide.

References

  • 1. Soysal A. Sağlık sektöründe çevre duyarlılığı: Yeşil hastane uygulamaları özelinde bir değerlendirme. II. Uluslararası çevre ve ahlak sempozyumu (ISEM 2014). Adıyaman. 24-26 Ekim. 2014.
  • 2. Hospital2020. Welcome to green hospital. 2015.
  • 3. Terekli G., Özkan O., Bayın G. Çevre dostu hastaneler: Hastaneden yeşil hastaneye. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi. 2013; 12(2): 37-54.
  • 4. Gedük E.A. Hastanelerde kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun önemi. HSP. 2017;4(2): 136-141.
  • 5. Wu, P., Mao, C., Wang, J., Song, Y. ve Wang, X. A decade review of the credits obtained by leed v2.2 certified green building projects. Building and Environment. 2016; 102: 167-178.
  • 6. Kim S., Osmond P. Analyzing green building rating tools for healthcare buildings from the building user’s perspective. Indoor and Built Environment. 2014; 23(5): 757-766.
  • 7. Palteki A.S. İstanbul’daki kamu hastanelerinin yeşil hastane ölçütlerine uygunluklarının belirlenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Türkiye, 2013.
  • 8. Ulusoy E. Comparison of leed to non-leed certified hospitals with regards to patient perspective and financial ındicators. 2012. Master’s thesis, Texas A&M University, USA.
  • 9. Certified Green Hospital. http://certifiedgreenhospital.com/. Erişim Tarihi: 29.01.2018.
  • 10. Northumbria University. Breeam for healthcare: report for: nhs estates and facilities policy. Newcastle. Northumbria University School of the Built and Natural Environment. 2012.
  • 11. Sahamir S.R. Zakaria R. Green assessment criteria for public hospital building development in Malaysia. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2014; 20: 106-115.
  • 12. Aubree A. BREEAM international. BRE Global. 2009.
  • 13. http://www.breeam.gov/. Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. Erişim Tarihi: 08.03.2016.
  • 14. Schwartz Y., Raslan R. Variations in result of building energy simulation tolls, and their impact on breeam and leed ratings: a case study. Energy and Buildings. 2013; 62: 350-359.
  • 15. Chen H., Lee W.L. Energy assessment of office buildings in China using leed 2.2 and beam plus 1.1. Energy and Buildings. 2013; 63: 129-137.
  • 16. Zhao J. Lam K.P. Influential factors analysis on leed building markets in u.u. east coast cities by using support vector regression. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2012; 5: 37-43.
  • 17. Xuan X. Effectiveness of indoor environment quality in leed-certified healthcare settings. Indoor and Built Environment. 2015; 0(0): 1-13. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X15587564. 18. USGBC. U.S. Green Building Council. leed v4 for building design and construction. 2015.
  • 19. Somalı, B. ve Ilıcalı, E. Leed ve breeam uluslararası yeşil bina değerlendirme sistemlerinin değerlendirilmesi. 2009. IX. Ulusal Tesisat Mühendisliği Kongresi, İzmir.
  • 20. Asdrubali F., Baldinelli G., Bianchi F., Sambuco S. A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems leed and itaca for residential buildings. Building and Environment. 2015; 86: 98-108.
  • 21. Suzer O. A comparative review of environmental concern prioritization: leed vs other major certification systems. J. Environmental Management. 2015; 154: 266-283.
  • 22. SB. Sağlık Bakanlığı. Sağlıkta enerji verimliliği çalıştayı sonuç raporu. 2012.
  • 23. Xia B., Zuo J., Skitmore M., Pullen S. Chen Q. Green star points obtained by Australian building projects. J. Architectural Engineering 2013; 19(4): 302-308.
  • 24. Nguyen B. K., Altan H. Comparative review of five sustainable rating systems. Procedia Engineering, 2011; 21: 376-386.
  • 25. Portalatin M., Roskoski M., Shouse T. Sustainability how-to guide series: Green building rating systems. IFMA environmental stewardship and sustainability strategic advisory group (ESS SAG). 2015.
  • 26. Newyorkessays. A comparison of building rating systems: Leed, green star, breeam a proposal to integrate biomimicry into green star rating. 2016. https://newyorkessays.com/essay-a-comparison-of-building-rating-systems-leed-green-star-breeam-a-proposal-to-integrate-biomimicry-into-green-star-rating/. Erişim Tarihi: 30.01.2018.
  • 27. Mitchell L.M. Green star and nabers: Learning from the australian experience with green building rating tools. Bose R.K. (ed.) Energy efficient cities: Assessment tools and benchmarking practices. Washington: The World Bank. 2010.
  • 28. Roderick Y., McEwan D., Wheatley C., Alonso C. Comparison of energy performance assessment between LEED, BREEAM and Green Star. In Eleventh International IBPSA Conference. 2009. p. 27-30.
  • 29. GGHH. https://www.greenhospitals.net/. Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2018.
  • 30. BREEAM. Best of breeam today’s most sustainable buildings. 2013.
  • 31. About Dell Children’s. https://www.dellchildrens.net/about-us/. Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2016.
  • 32. United States Green Building Council. http://usgbc-centraltexas.org/hid-global-celebrates-prestigious-leed-platinum-certification. 19.04.2016.
  • 33. Engenium. http://www.engenium.co.nz/Projects/Commercial/Forte-Health-New-Zealand-steel-PRESSS-technology-__I.3217. 28.07.2017.
  • 34. Practice Greenhealth. https://practicegreenhealth.org/awards/2017winners/top25. Erişim Tarihi: 28.07.2017.
  • 35. Hoşgör H. Yeşil hastane konsepti ve Türkiye deneyimi. HSP. 2014;1(2):75-84.
  • 36. Yıldız H. Sürdürülebilirlik bağlamında sağlık sektöründe inovatif uygulamalar: yeşil hastaneler. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 7(13): 323-340.

Yeşil Hastane Sertifika Sistemleri

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 161 - 169, 10.02.2019
https://doi.org/10.17681/hsp.394880

Abstract

Hastaneler hem çevre hem de insan sağlığına etki
eden enerji ve kaynak kullanımının yoğun olduğu yapılardır. Özellikle tek
başına sağlık sektörü, kamunun toplam karbon salınımının yaklaşık %25’ini
oluşturmakta ve zehirli, zararlı maddeler ve kirli sulardan oluşan büyük
miktarlarda atık üretmektedir. Hastaneleri bu durumdan kurtarıp çevreye ve
insan sağlığına daha faydalı kurumlar haline getirme düşüncesi yeşil hastane
kavramını gündeme getirmiştir. Yani yeşil hastane, daha az enerji harcayan,
daha az atık üreten, daha fazla geri dönüştürülebilir malzeme kullanan bu
sayede daha sağlıklı kurumlar haline gelen hastaneleri ifade etmektedir. Yeşil
hastanelerin dünya genelinde yaygınlaşması sonucunda hastanelerin yeşil olma
şartlarını ne kadar karşıladığının bilinmesi ihtiyacı da yeşil hastane
sertifikalandırma sistemlerinin ortaya çıkmasını sağlamıştır. Bu
sertifikalandırma sistemleri hastaneleri çeşitli alanlarda değerlendirerek bir
puanlama yapmakta ve hastanelere aldıkları puanlara göre farklı seviyelerde
sertifika vermektedirler. Bu sertifikalara sahip olan hastaneler daha iyi hasta
sonuçları, hasta/çalışan güvenliği ve memnuniyeti, maliyet tasarrufu ve
verimlilik artışı elde etmektedirler. Bu doğrultuda, bu çalışmada dünya
genelinde en sık kullanılan yeşil hastane sertifika sistemleri olan BREEAM for
Healthcare, LEED for Healthcare ve Australian Green Star sertifika sistemleri
üzerinde durulacaktır. 

References

  • 1. Soysal A. Sağlık sektöründe çevre duyarlılığı: Yeşil hastane uygulamaları özelinde bir değerlendirme. II. Uluslararası çevre ve ahlak sempozyumu (ISEM 2014). Adıyaman. 24-26 Ekim. 2014.
  • 2. Hospital2020. Welcome to green hospital. 2015.
  • 3. Terekli G., Özkan O., Bayın G. Çevre dostu hastaneler: Hastaneden yeşil hastaneye. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi. 2013; 12(2): 37-54.
  • 4. Gedük E.A. Hastanelerde kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun önemi. HSP. 2017;4(2): 136-141.
  • 5. Wu, P., Mao, C., Wang, J., Song, Y. ve Wang, X. A decade review of the credits obtained by leed v2.2 certified green building projects. Building and Environment. 2016; 102: 167-178.
  • 6. Kim S., Osmond P. Analyzing green building rating tools for healthcare buildings from the building user’s perspective. Indoor and Built Environment. 2014; 23(5): 757-766.
  • 7. Palteki A.S. İstanbul’daki kamu hastanelerinin yeşil hastane ölçütlerine uygunluklarının belirlenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Türkiye, 2013.
  • 8. Ulusoy E. Comparison of leed to non-leed certified hospitals with regards to patient perspective and financial ındicators. 2012. Master’s thesis, Texas A&M University, USA.
  • 9. Certified Green Hospital. http://certifiedgreenhospital.com/. Erişim Tarihi: 29.01.2018.
  • 10. Northumbria University. Breeam for healthcare: report for: nhs estates and facilities policy. Newcastle. Northumbria University School of the Built and Natural Environment. 2012.
  • 11. Sahamir S.R. Zakaria R. Green assessment criteria for public hospital building development in Malaysia. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2014; 20: 106-115.
  • 12. Aubree A. BREEAM international. BRE Global. 2009.
  • 13. http://www.breeam.gov/. Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. Erişim Tarihi: 08.03.2016.
  • 14. Schwartz Y., Raslan R. Variations in result of building energy simulation tolls, and their impact on breeam and leed ratings: a case study. Energy and Buildings. 2013; 62: 350-359.
  • 15. Chen H., Lee W.L. Energy assessment of office buildings in China using leed 2.2 and beam plus 1.1. Energy and Buildings. 2013; 63: 129-137.
  • 16. Zhao J. Lam K.P. Influential factors analysis on leed building markets in u.u. east coast cities by using support vector regression. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2012; 5: 37-43.
  • 17. Xuan X. Effectiveness of indoor environment quality in leed-certified healthcare settings. Indoor and Built Environment. 2015; 0(0): 1-13. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X15587564. 18. USGBC. U.S. Green Building Council. leed v4 for building design and construction. 2015.
  • 19. Somalı, B. ve Ilıcalı, E. Leed ve breeam uluslararası yeşil bina değerlendirme sistemlerinin değerlendirilmesi. 2009. IX. Ulusal Tesisat Mühendisliği Kongresi, İzmir.
  • 20. Asdrubali F., Baldinelli G., Bianchi F., Sambuco S. A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems leed and itaca for residential buildings. Building and Environment. 2015; 86: 98-108.
  • 21. Suzer O. A comparative review of environmental concern prioritization: leed vs other major certification systems. J. Environmental Management. 2015; 154: 266-283.
  • 22. SB. Sağlık Bakanlığı. Sağlıkta enerji verimliliği çalıştayı sonuç raporu. 2012.
  • 23. Xia B., Zuo J., Skitmore M., Pullen S. Chen Q. Green star points obtained by Australian building projects. J. Architectural Engineering 2013; 19(4): 302-308.
  • 24. Nguyen B. K., Altan H. Comparative review of five sustainable rating systems. Procedia Engineering, 2011; 21: 376-386.
  • 25. Portalatin M., Roskoski M., Shouse T. Sustainability how-to guide series: Green building rating systems. IFMA environmental stewardship and sustainability strategic advisory group (ESS SAG). 2015.
  • 26. Newyorkessays. A comparison of building rating systems: Leed, green star, breeam a proposal to integrate biomimicry into green star rating. 2016. https://newyorkessays.com/essay-a-comparison-of-building-rating-systems-leed-green-star-breeam-a-proposal-to-integrate-biomimicry-into-green-star-rating/. Erişim Tarihi: 30.01.2018.
  • 27. Mitchell L.M. Green star and nabers: Learning from the australian experience with green building rating tools. Bose R.K. (ed.) Energy efficient cities: Assessment tools and benchmarking practices. Washington: The World Bank. 2010.
  • 28. Roderick Y., McEwan D., Wheatley C., Alonso C. Comparison of energy performance assessment between LEED, BREEAM and Green Star. In Eleventh International IBPSA Conference. 2009. p. 27-30.
  • 29. GGHH. https://www.greenhospitals.net/. Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2018.
  • 30. BREEAM. Best of breeam today’s most sustainable buildings. 2013.
  • 31. About Dell Children’s. https://www.dellchildrens.net/about-us/. Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2016.
  • 32. United States Green Building Council. http://usgbc-centraltexas.org/hid-global-celebrates-prestigious-leed-platinum-certification. 19.04.2016.
  • 33. Engenium. http://www.engenium.co.nz/Projects/Commercial/Forte-Health-New-Zealand-steel-PRESSS-technology-__I.3217. 28.07.2017.
  • 34. Practice Greenhealth. https://practicegreenhealth.org/awards/2017winners/top25. Erişim Tarihi: 28.07.2017.
  • 35. Hoşgör H. Yeşil hastane konsepti ve Türkiye deneyimi. HSP. 2014;1(2):75-84.
  • 36. Yıldız H. Sürdürülebilirlik bağlamında sağlık sektöründe inovatif uygulamalar: yeşil hastaneler. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 7(13): 323-340.
There are 35 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section REVIEW ARTICLE
Authors

Yasin Çilhoroz 0000-0002-5171-7779

Oğuz Işık 0000-0001-7368-7024

Publication Date February 10, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 6 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Çilhoroz, Y., & Işık, O. (2019). Yeşil Hastane Sertifika Sistemleri. Sağlık Bilimleri Ve Meslekleri Dergisi, 6(1), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.17681/hsp.394880
AMA Çilhoroz Y, Işık O. Yeşil Hastane Sertifika Sistemleri. HSP. February 2019;6(1):161-169. doi:10.17681/hsp.394880
Chicago Çilhoroz, Yasin, and Oğuz Işık. “Yeşil Hastane Sertifika Sistemleri”. Sağlık Bilimleri Ve Meslekleri Dergisi 6, no. 1 (February 2019): 161-69. https://doi.org/10.17681/hsp.394880.
EndNote Çilhoroz Y, Işık O (February 1, 2019) Yeşil Hastane Sertifika Sistemleri. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi 6 1 161–169.
IEEE Y. Çilhoroz and O. Işık, “Yeşil Hastane Sertifika Sistemleri”, HSP, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 161–169, 2019, doi: 10.17681/hsp.394880.
ISNAD Çilhoroz, Yasin - Işık, Oğuz. “Yeşil Hastane Sertifika Sistemleri”. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi 6/1 (February 2019), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.17681/hsp.394880.
JAMA Çilhoroz Y, Işık O. Yeşil Hastane Sertifika Sistemleri. HSP. 2019;6:161–169.
MLA Çilhoroz, Yasin and Oğuz Işık. “Yeşil Hastane Sertifika Sistemleri”. Sağlık Bilimleri Ve Meslekleri Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, pp. 161-9, doi:10.17681/hsp.394880.
Vancouver Çilhoroz Y, Işık O. Yeşil Hastane Sertifika Sistemleri. HSP. 2019;6(1):161-9.