Research Article

Effective Conflict Resolution and Negotiation Skills Scale

Volume: 36 Number: 1 June 17, 2019
Nihal Mamatoğlu , Seçil Keskin
TR EN

Effective Conflict Resolution and Negotiation Skills Scale

Abstract

This study aims to develop an original effective conflict resolution and negotiation skills scale which is culturally appropriate for use in Turkish context. The study employed three different phases of inquiry. First interviews were made with 134 working adults (70 male and 64 female) from different work settings to collect real life conflict experiences and to create items. To examine the validity and reliability of the items in the scale, the researchers analysed the results from 159 students (123 female and 36 male). Lastly, 115 employees from a company which produces white appliances, 98 male and 17 female adults participated in the research to test the scale among working adults. Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQ-SF) was used to test the convergent validity of the scale. At the end, the research findings showed that Effective Conflict Resolution and Negotiation Skills Scale has 40 items with 7 sub dimensions namely, “negotiator’s style” “rationality and common sense” “sensitivity for opponents” “goal orientation” “planning” “effective communication” “expressing oneself decidedly”. The results show that Effective Conflict Resolution and Negotiation Skills Scale, is a valid and reliable original scale that has its roots in Turkish culture.

Keywords

negotiation,Conflict resolution,scale development

References

  1. Referans1 Agee, M.L. & Kabasakal, H.E. (1993). Exploring Conflict Resolution Styles: A Study of Turkish and American University Business Students. International Journal of Social Economics, 20 (9), 3-14.
  2. Referans2 Akbalik, F.G. (2001). Çatışma Çözme Ölçeği’nin Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması. Türk Psikologlar Derneği Dergisi, 2 (15), 1-15.
  3. Referans3 Arnold, J.A. & O’connor, K.M. (2006). How Negotiator Self-Efficacy Drives Desicions to Pursue Mediation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36 (11), 2649-2669.
  4. Referans4 Arslan, C. (2005). Kişilerarası Çatışma Çözme ve Problem Çözme Yaklaşımlarının Yükleme Karmaşıklığı Açısından İncelenmesi, (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Konya Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  5. Referans5 Basim, H.N., Çetin, F. & Meydan, C.H. (2009a). Kişilerarası Çatışma Çözme Yaklaşımlarında Kontrol Odağının Rolü. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21, 57-69.
  6. Referans6 Basim, H.N., Çetin F. & Tabak, A. (2009b). Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliklerinin Kişilerarası Çatışma Çözme Yaklaşımlarıyla İlişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24 (63), 20-34.
  7. Referans7 Bazerman, M.H. & Neale, M.A. (1982). Improving Negotiator Effectiveness Under Final Offer Arbitration: The Role of Selection and Training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 543-548.
  8. Referans8 Bazerman, M.H. (1985). Norms of Distributive Justice in Interest Arbitration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 38 (4), 558-570.
  9. Referans9 Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191-1205.
  10. Referans10 Brett, J., Northcrafy, G. & Pinkley, R. (1999). Stairways to Heaven: An Interlocking Self-Regulation Model of Negotiation. The Academy of Management Review, 24, 435–451.
APA
Mamatoğlu, N., & Keskin, S. (2019). Effective Conflict Resolution and Negotiation Skills Scale. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(1), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.433392