Research Article

Short-Term Consolidation of Information for Episodic Memory: The Role of Attention

Volume: 38 Number: 2 December 15, 2021
Erol Özçelik *, Hasan Tekman
EN TR

Short-Term Consolidation of Information for Episodic Memory: The Role of Attention

Abstract

Pieces of evidence from rapid serial visual presentation, attentional blink, and dual-task interference phenomena propose that human beings have a significant limitation on the short-term consolidation process. Short-term consolidation is transferring perceptual representations to a more durable form of memory. Although previous research has shown that masks presented after targets interrupt the consolidation process of information, there is not enough evidence for the role of attention in consolidation for episodic memory. Three experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of attention and stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between targets and masks on episodic memory. Masks were presented after targets with varying SOAs. The participants in the divided attention condition performed the attention-demanding secondary task after the presentation of the masks, whereas participants in the full attention condition were not requested to perform the secondary task after the presentation of masks. The results showed that reducing SOA between targets and masks caused an impairment in memory performance for divided attention but not for full attention, providing evidence for the necessity of attention for the short-term consolidation process.

Keywords

short-term consolidation , episodic memory , dual-task , mask

References

  1. Bireta, T. J., & Mazzei, C. M. (2016). Does the isolation effect require attention?. Memory & Cognition, 44(1), 1-14.
  2. Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(38), 14325-14329.
  3. Christmann, C., & Leuthold, H. (2004). The attentional blink is susceptible to concurrent perceptual processing demands Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57, 357-377.
  4. Chun, M. M. (1997). Temporal binding errors are redistributed in the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1191–1199.
  5. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, 109-127.
  6. Cleary, A. M. (2014). The sense of recognition during retrieval failure: Implications for the nature of memory traces. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 60, pp. 77-112). Academic Press.
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  8. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497-505.
  9. De Schrijver, S., & Barrouillet, P. (2017). Consolidation and restoration of memory traces in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(5), 1651-1657.
  10. Duncan, J., Ward, R., & Shapiro, K. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature, 369, 313–315.
APA
Özçelik, E., & Tekman, H. (2021). Short-Term Consolidation of Information for Episodic Memory: The Role of Attention. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(2), 287-307. https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.712414