A TEST BASED ON THE COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH FOR EQUALITY OF MEANS UNDER THE UNEQUAL VARIANCE ASSUMPTION

Year 2012, Volume: 41 Issue: 4, 605 - 613, 01.04.2012

Esra Yiğit Gökpınar  fikri Gökpınar

Abstract

The classical F-test to compare several populations means depends on the assumption of homogeneity of variances of the population and on normality. When these assumptions - especially the equality of variance - is dropped, the classical F-test fails to reject the null hypothesis even if the data actually provide strong evidence for it. This can be considered a serious problem in some applications especially when the sample sizes are not large. To deal with this problem, a number of tests are available in the literature. Recently Pal, Lim and Ling (A computational
approach to statistical inferences, J. Appl. Probab. Stat. 2 (1), 13–35, 2007) developed a computational technique, called the Computational Approach Test (CAT), which looks similar to a parametric bootstrap for hypothesis testing. Chang and Pal (A revisit to the Behren-Fisher Problem: Comparison of five test methods, Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 37 (6), 1064–1085, 2008) applied CAT to test the equality of two population means when the variances are unknown and arbitrary. In this study we apply a developed CAT
to test the equality of k population means when the variances are unequal. Also the Brown-Forsythe, Weerahandi’s Generalized F, Parametric Bootstrap and Welch tests are recalled and a simulation study performed to compare these tests according to type one errors and powers in different combinations of parameters and various sample sizes.

Keywords

Brown-Forsythe Test, Computational Approach Test, Generalized F test, Parametric Bootstrap Test, Classic F Test, Welch Test, 2000 AMS Classification: 62 F 03

A TEST BASED ON THE COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH FOR EQUALITY OF MEANS UNDER THE UNEQUAL VARIANCE ASSUMPTION

Abstract

References

• Bishop, T. A. and Dudewicz, E. J. Heteroscedastic ANOVA, Sankhya 43 B, 40–57, 1981.
• Brown, M. B. and Forsythe, A. B. The small sample behavior of some statistics which test the equality of several means, Technometrics 16, 129–132, 1974.
• Chang, C. H. and Pal, N. A revisit to the Behren-Fisher Problem: Comparison of five test methods, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 37 (6), 1064–1085, 2008. [4] Chang, C. H., Pal, N. and Lim, W K. Comparing several population means: a paramet- ric bootstrap method, and its comparison with usual ANOVA F test as well as ANOM, Computational Statistics 25 (1), 71–95, 2010.
• Gamage, J. ve Weerahandi, S. Size performance of some tests in one-way ANOVA, Com- munications in Statistics Simulations 27 (3), 625–640, 1998.
• Gerami, A. and Zahedian, A. Comparing the means of normal populations with unequal variances(Proceedings of the 53rd Session of Intenational Statistical Institute, Seoul, Korea, 2001). [7] Krishnamoorthy, K., Lu, F. and Thomas, M. A parametric boostrap approach for ANOVA with unequal variances: fixed and random models, Computational Statistics and Data Anal- ysis, 51, 5731–5742, 2006.
• Krutchkoff, R. G. One-way fixed effects analysis of variance when the error variances may be unequal, J. Statist. Comput. Simulation 30, 259–271, 1988.
• Lee, S. and Ahn, C. H. Modified ANOVA for unequal variances, Communications in Statis- tics Simulations 32, 987–1004, 2003.
• Pal, N., Lim, W K. and Ling, C H. A computational approach to statistical inferences, J. Appl. Probab. Stat. 2 (1), 13–35, 2007.
• Tsui, K. and Weerahandi, S. Generalized p-values in significance testing of hypotheses in the presence of nuisance parametres, Journal of the American Statistical Assocation 84, 602–607, 1989.
• Weerahandi, S. ANOVA under unequal error variances, Biometrica 38, 330–336, 1995.
• Weerahandi, S. Exact Statistical Method for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995). [14] Weerahandi, S. Generalized Inference in Repeated Measures: Exact Methods in MANOVA and Mixed Models(Wiley, New York, 2004).
• Welch, B. L. On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach, Biometrica 38, 330–336, 1951.
• Xu, L. and Wang, S. A new generalized p-value for ANOVA under heteroscedasticity, Sta- tistics and Probability Letters 78, 963–969, 2007.
• Xu, L. and Wang, S. A new generalized p-value and its upper bound for ANOVA under unequal erros variances, Communications in Statistics Theory and Methods 37, 1002–1010, 2007. [18] Yi˘git, E. and G¨okpınar, F. A simulation study on tests for one-way ANOVA under the unequal variance assumption, Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. Series A 12, 15–34, 2010.