BibTex RIS Cite

Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data

Year 2011, Volume: 40 Issue: 4, 609 - 616, 01.04.2011

References

  • Agresti, A. A model for agreement between ratings on an ordinal scale, Biometrics 44, 539–548, 1988. [2] Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis (Wiley, New York, 2002).
  • Bangwidala, S. A graphical test for observer agreement, Proceedings of the 45thInterna- tional Statistical Institute Meeting, Amsterdam, 1, 307–308, 1985.
  • Becker, M. P. Using association models to analyse agreement data: two examples, Statistics in Medicine 8, 1199–1207, 1989.
  • Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46, 1960.
  • Cohen, J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit, Psychological Bulletin 70, 213–220, 1968.
  • Fleiss, J. L., Cohen, J. and Everitt, B. S. Large sample standard errors of κ and weighted κ, Psychological Bulletin 72, 323–327, 1969.
  • Goodman L. A. Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories, Journal of American Statistical Association 74, 537–553, 1979.
  • Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics 33, 159–174, 1977.
  • Schuster C. and Von Eye, A. Models for ordinal agreement data, Biometrical Journal 43 (7), 795–808, 2001. [11] Tanner, M. A. and Young, M. A. Modeling agreement among raters, Journal of American Statistical Association 80, 175–180, 1985.
  • Tanner, M. A. and Young, M. A. Modeling ordinal scale disagreement, Psychological Bulletin 98(2), 408–415, 1985.
  • von Eye, A. and Von Eye, M. Can one use Cohen’s kappa to examine disagreement? Methodology 1 (4), 129–142, 2005.
  • von Eye, A. An alternative to Cohen’s κ, European Psychologist 11 (1), 12–24, 2006.

Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data

Year 2011, Volume: 40 Issue: 4, 609 - 616, 01.04.2011

References

  • Agresti, A. A model for agreement between ratings on an ordinal scale, Biometrics 44, 539–548, 1988. [2] Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis (Wiley, New York, 2002).
  • Bangwidala, S. A graphical test for observer agreement, Proceedings of the 45thInterna- tional Statistical Institute Meeting, Amsterdam, 1, 307–308, 1985.
  • Becker, M. P. Using association models to analyse agreement data: two examples, Statistics in Medicine 8, 1199–1207, 1989.
  • Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46, 1960.
  • Cohen, J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit, Psychological Bulletin 70, 213–220, 1968.
  • Fleiss, J. L., Cohen, J. and Everitt, B. S. Large sample standard errors of κ and weighted κ, Psychological Bulletin 72, 323–327, 1969.
  • Goodman L. A. Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories, Journal of American Statistical Association 74, 537–553, 1979.
  • Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics 33, 159–174, 1977.
  • Schuster C. and Von Eye, A. Models for ordinal agreement data, Biometrical Journal 43 (7), 795–808, 2001. [11] Tanner, M. A. and Young, M. A. Modeling agreement among raters, Journal of American Statistical Association 80, 175–180, 1985.
  • Tanner, M. A. and Young, M. A. Modeling ordinal scale disagreement, Psychological Bulletin 98(2), 408–415, 1985.
  • von Eye, A. and Von Eye, M. Can one use Cohen’s kappa to examine disagreement? Methodology 1 (4), 129–142, 2005.
  • von Eye, A. An alternative to Cohen’s κ, European Psychologist 11 (1), 12–24, 2006.
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Mathematics
Authors

Tülay Saraçbaşı This is me

Publication Date April 1, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 40 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Saraçbaşı, T. (2011). Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 40(4), 609-616.
AMA Saraçbaşı T. Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. April 2011;40(4):609-616.
Chicago Saraçbaşı, Tülay. “Agreement Plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data”. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 40, no. 4 (April 2011): 609-16.
EndNote Saraçbaşı T (April 1, 2011) Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 40 4 609–616.
IEEE T. Saraçbaşı, “Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data”, Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 609–616, 2011.
ISNAD Saraçbaşı, Tülay. “Agreement Plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data”. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 40/4 (April 2011), 609-616.
JAMA Saraçbaşı T. Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 2011;40:609–616.
MLA Saraçbaşı, Tülay. “Agreement Plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data”. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 40, no. 4, 2011, pp. 609-16.
Vancouver Saraçbaşı T. Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 2011;40(4):609-16.