CIVIL SOCIETY IN CONFLICT REGULATION: CYPRUS CASE

Öz

As a conflict regulation method, consociationalism offers stability and peace, though short-term and negative, for deeply divided societies. However, the success of consociationalism is highly doubted due to lacking long-term peace and durability. Establishment and continuation of consociational regimes mostly depend on external pressure. When the pressure vanishes, majorities tend to shift to majoritarian system or for worse, conflict can resume. This paper argues that, being only dependent on elite cooperation and on the back-up of international actors is not adequate and creates a weakness in the approach. To overcome this, domestic actors, most importantly civil societal actors, should be empowered and incorporated in the establishment of a long-term positive peace, in order the consociational system to be sustainable. Through civil society cooperation and projects, popular adoption of the system and improvement of communal relations can be realized. This argument is tested on a protracted conflict, Cyprus which has experienced power-sharing with external pressure and is still discussing it as a future solution, through evaluating the impacts of bi-communal NGO projects and outcomes of civil society initiatives. By utilizing conclusions from the case, this paper offers contribution to both procedures of consociational theory and conflict regulation in other multi-ethnic states.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• çatışma yönetimi,Kıbrıs

CIVIL SOCIETY IN CONFLICT REGULATION: CYPRUS CASE

Öz

As a conflict regulation method, consociationalism offers
stability and peace, though short-term and negative, for deeply divided
societies. However, the success of consociationalism is highly doubted
due to lacking long-term peace and durability. Establishment and
continuation of consociational regimes mostly depend on external
pressure. When the pressure vanishes, majorities tend to shift to
majoritarian system or for worse, conflict can resume. This paper argues
that, being only dependent on elite cooperation and on the back-up of
international actors is not adequate and creates a weakness in the
approach. To overcome this, domestic actors, most importantly civil
societal actors, should be empowered and incorporated in the
establishment of a long-term positive peace, in order the consociational
system to be sustainable. Through civil society cooperation and projects,
popular adoption of the system and improvement of communal relations
can be realized. This argument is tested on a protracted conflict, Cyprus
which has experienced power-sharing with external pressure and is still
discussing it as a future solution, through evaluating the impacts of bicommunal NGO projects and outcomes of civil society initiatives. By
utilizing conclusions from the case, this paper offers contribution to both
procedures of consociational theory and conflict regulation in other multiethnic states.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Conflict Regulation,Ethnic Conflict,Consociationalism,Civil Society,Cyprus

Kaynakça

1. Bibliography
2. Azar, E. (1990). The Management of Protracted Social Conflict. Maryland: Dartmouth.
3. Byrne, S. (2001). "Consociational and Civic Society Approaches to Peacebuilding in Northern Ireland". Journal of Peace Research, Vol.38, No.3, (pp. 327-345).
4. Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
5. Fisher, R. J. (2013). "Acknowledging Basic Human Needs and adjusting the focus of the problem-solving workshop". K. Avruch, & C. Mitchell (eds), Conflict Resolution and Human Needs (pp. 186-201). New York: Routledge.
6. Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies. New York: Yale University.
7. McGarry, J., & O'Leary, B. (2006). "Consociational Theory, Northern Ireland’s Conflict and its Agreement 2. What Critics of Consociation Can Learn from Northern Ireland". Government and Opposition, Vol.41, No.2, (pp. 249-277).
8. McGarry, J., & O'Leary, B. (2006). "Consociational Theory, Northern Ireland’s Conflict and its Agreement. Part 1: What Consociationalists Can Learn from Northern Ireland". Government and Opposition, Vol.41, No.1, (pp. 43-63).

9. O’Flynn, I., & Russell , D. (2011). "Deepening Democracy: The Role of Civil Society". K. Cordell, & S. Wolff (eds), Routledge Handbook of Ethnic Conflict (pp. 225-235). New York: Routledge.
10. Papagianni, K. (2012). "Political engagement, mediation and the non-governmental sector" . S. Wolff, & C. Yakinthou (eds), Conflict Management in Divided Societies (pp. 167-184). New York: Routledge.
11. Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2012). Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Cambridge: Polity.
12. Sisk, T. (2004). "Peacemaking in Civil Wars: Obstacles, Options and Opportunities". U. Schneckener, & S. Wolff (eds), Managing and Settling Ethnic Conflicts (pp. 248-270). New York: Palgrave.
13. Sözen, A. (2014). A New Holistic Multi-Track Peacebuilding Design for Cyprus Conflict: Blending Idealism with Pragmatism. ISA . Toronto.
14. UN. (1994). Report of the Secretary-General on his Mission of Good Offices in Cyprus, S/26026. New York : UN.
15. UNDP. (2015, 02 27). Brochure on The Technical Committee on Cultural Heritage in Cyprus (. 03 02, 2016 tarihinde UNDP in Cyprus: http://www.cy.undp.org/content/cyprus/en/home/library/partnershipforthefuture/the-technical-committee-on-cultural-heritage--2015-.html adresinden alındı
16. Wolff, S., & Cordell, C. (2011). "Power sharing". K. Cordell, & S. Wolff (eds), Routledge Handbook of Ethnic Conflict (pp. 300-310). New York: Routledge.
17. Yakinthou, C. (2009). Political Settlements in Divided Societies. London: Palgrave.