Bir Tekstil Üretim Tesisinde Süreç Temelli Harmonik Profilleri ve Göreceli Araştırma Öncelikleri

Abstract

Doğrusal olmayan yüklerin yoğun olduğu endüstriyel tesislerde harmonik bozulma, yük ve proses özelliklerine bağlı olarak değişebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, bir tekstil tesisindeki altı üretim ve yardımcı işletme noktasına ait üç fazlı saha ölçümleri analiz edilmiştir. Hazırlama–ısıtıcı, hazırlama–sürücü, büküm, fikse–buhar, kompresör–hava ve kompresör–kurutucu noktalarında akım toplam harmonik bozulması (THDI), gerilim toplam harmonik bozulması (THDV), toplam güç faktörü, yer değiştirme güç faktörü ve belirgin harmonik bileşenler incelenmiştir. Kompanzasyonu devre dışı bırakılan 2500 kVA transformatöre ait ölçüm ise tesis referansı olarak kullanılmıştır. Proseslerin göreli inceleme öncelikleri, ortalama THDI, ortalama THDV ve güç faktörü ayrışmasına dayalı eşit ağırlıklı keşifsel bir puanla belirlenmiştir. En yüksek ortalama ve maksimum THDI değerleri fikse–buhar prosesinde sırasıyla %61,79 ve %64,62 olarak belirlenirken, en yüksek faz THDV değeri kompresör–hava prosesinde %8,05 olarak ölçülmüştür. Göreli sıralamada fikse–buharı kompresör–hava ve büküm izlemiştir. Tesis referansındaki ortalama THDI değerinin bazı proseslerden düşük olması, tesis düzeyindeki tek bir ölçümün yerel harmonik farklılıkları yeterince yansıtmayabileceğini göstermiştir. Bulgular, güç kalitesi değerlendirmelerinin proses düzeyindeki eş zamanlı ve uzun süreli ölçümlerle desteklenmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. 

Keywords

• Güç kalitesi
• harmonik bozulma
• tekstil endüstrisi
• proses analizi
• THDI
• güç faktörü

Supporting Institution

Bu çalışma herhangi bir kurum veya kuruluş tarafından finansal olarak desteklenmemiştir.

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışmanın tüm aşamalarının araştırma ve yayın etiğine uygun olarak yürütüldüğünü, etik kurallara ve bilimsel atıf ilkelerine uyulduğunu beyan ederiz.

Thanks

Yazarlar, çalışma süresince sağladıkları teknik destek ve katkılarından dolayı Aydemir Kalebek ve Kayhan Kalebek’e teşekkür eder.

Process-Based Harmonic Profiles and Relative Investigation Priorities in a Textile Manufacturing Facility

Abstract

In industrial facilities with a high concentration of nonlinear loads, harmonic distortion can vary depending on load and process characteristics. In this study, three-phase field measurements from six production and auxiliary operation points at a textile plant were analyzed. Total harmonic distortion of current (THDI), total harmonic distortion of voltage (THDV), total power factor, displacement power factor, and prominent harmonic components were examined at the preparation–heater, preparation–drive, twisting, steam fixation, air compressor, and compressor dryer points. Measurements from a 2,500 kVA transformer with compensation disabled were used as the facility reference. The relative priorities for examining the processes were determined using an equally weighted exploratory score based on average THDI, average THDV, and power-factor separation. The highest average and maximum THDI values were determined to be 61.79% and 64.62%, respectively, in the steam fixation process, while the highest phase THDV value was measured at 8.05% in the air compressor process. In the relative ranking, the steam fixation process was followed by the air compressor and twisting processes. The fact that the average THDI value at the facility level was lower than that of some processes indicates that a single measurement at the facility level may not adequately reflect local harmonic differences. The findings demonstrate that power quality assessments must be supported by simultaneous, long-term measurements at the process level.

Keywords

• Power quality
• harmonic distortion
• textile industry
• process analysis
• THDI
• power factor

Supporting Institution

This study was not financially supported by any institution or organization.

Ethical Statement

We hereby declare that all stages of this study were conducted in accordance with research and publication ethics, and that we adhered to ethical guidelines and the principles of scientific citation.

Thanks

The authors would like to thank Aydemir Kalebek and Kayhan Kalebek for their technical support and contributions during the course of this study.

References

1. Kürker, F. (2017). Enerji sistemlerinde harmonik analizi ve harmonik azaltma teknikleri [Harmonic analysis and harmonic mitigation techniques in energy systems] [Doctoral dissertation, Harran University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences].
2. Alawasa, K. M., & Al-Badi, A. H. (2024). Investigation and analysis of the power quality in an academic institution’s electrical distribution system. Energies, 17(16), 3998. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17163998
3. Bebikhov, Y. V., Egorov, A. N., & Semenov, A. S. (2020). How higher harmonics affect the electrical facilities in mining power systems. In 2020 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM) (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEAM48468.2020.9111965
4. Lumbreras, D., Gálvez, E., Collado, A., & Zaragoza, J. (2020). Trends in power quality, harmonic mitigation and standards for light and heavy industries: A review. Energies, 13(21), 5792. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215792
5. Yaghoobi, J., Abdullah, A., Kumar, D., Zare, F., & Soltani, H. (2019). Power quality issues of distorted and weak distribution networks in mining industry: A review. IEEE Access, 7, 162500–162518. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950911
6. Senra, R., Boaventura, W. C., & Mendes, E. M. A. M. (2017). Assessment of the harmonic currents generated by single-phase nonlinear loads. Electric Power Systems Research, 147, 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.02.028
7. Sainz, L., Mesas, J. J., & Ferrer, A. (2008). Characterization of non-linear load behavior. Electric Power Systems Research, 78(10), 1773–1783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2008.03.004
8. Vlahinić, S., Brnobić, D., & Vučetić, D. (2009). Measurement and analysis of harmonic distortion in power distribution systems. Electric Power Systems Research, 79(7), 1121–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2009.02.004

9. Dalali, M., & Jalilian, A. (2015). Indices for measurement of harmonic distortion in power systems according to IEC 61000-4-7 standard. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 9(14), 1903–1912. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0366
10. Obulesu, Y. P., Venkateswara Reddy, M., & Kusumalatha, Y. (2014). A %THD analysis of industrial power distribution systems with active power filter: Case studies. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 60, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.02.037
11. Nassif, A. B. (2019). Assessing the impact of harmonics and interharmonics of top and mudpump variable frequency drives in drilling rigs. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 55(6), 5574–5583. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2019.2929708
12. Ge, C., de Oliveira, R. A., Gu, I. Y.-H., & Bollen, M. H. J. (2021). Unsupervised deep learning and analysis of harmonic variation patterns using big data from multiple locations. Electric Power Systems Research, 194, 107042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107042
13. Elrajoubi, S., Faesing, M., Eckoldt, H.-J., Ponci, F., & Monti, A. (2025). Assessment of power quality in an industrial facility: A case study at DESY Hamburg. IEEE Open Journal of Instrumentation and Measurement, 4, 9000211. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJIM.2025.3629874
14. Ivascanu, P., Panoiu, M., & Panoiu, C. (2025). Measurement-based analysis of static var compensator effects in industrial rolling mill grids. Energies, 18(23), 6123. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236123
15. Kumar, V. S., & Saravanan, V. (2015). A case study on harmonic distortion in textile industry. In 2015 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AUPEC.2015.7324887
16. Daniel, K., Kütt, L., Iqbal, M. N., Shabbir, N., Rehman, A. U., Shafiq, M., & Hamam, H. (2022). Current harmonic aggregation cases for contemporary loads. Energies, 15(2), 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020437
17. Arghandeh, R., Onen, A., Jung, J., Cheng, D., Broadwater, R. P., & Centeno, V. (2014). Phasor-based assessment for harmonic sources in distribution networks. Electric Power Systems Research, 116, 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2014.05.012
18. Mesas, J. J., Sainz, L., Monjo, L., & Pedra, J. (2022). An appropriate index to assess the global cancellation level of the harmonic currents consumed by a set of single-phase uncontrolled rectifiers and a set of fluorescent lamps. Energies, 15(12), 4315. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124315
19. Michalec, Ł., Jasiński, M., Sikorski, T., Leonowicz, Z., Jasiński, Ł., & Suresh, V. (2021). Impact of Harmonic Currents of Nonlinear Loads on Power Quality of a Low Voltage Network–Review and Case Study. Energies, 14(12), 3665. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123665
20. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2022). IEEE standard for harmonic control in electric power systems (IEEE Std 519-2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2022.9848440
21. Ugwuagbo, E., Ray, B., Balogun, A., Okafor, F., Sul, J., Nabi, N., & Datta, U. (2026). Power quality assessment and harmonic mitigation at the point of common coupling of industrial load. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, 37, 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-025-01245-7
22. International Electrotechnical Commission. (2025). Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-30: Testing and measurement techniques—Power quality measurement methods (IEC 61000-4-30:2025).
23. Coman, C. M., Florescu, A., & Oancea, C. D. (2020). Improving the efficiency and sustainability of power systems using distributed power factor correction methods. Sustainability, 12(8), 3134. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083134
24. Nur, A., & Kürker, F. (2026). Multi-criteria optimization and comparative evaluation of passive harmonic filters using advanced meta-heuristic algorithms. Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science, 15(1), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1788646