BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2013, Volume: 44 Issue: 44, 159 - 169, 01.06.2013

Veli Duyan Selahattin Gelbal Esra Çalik Var

Abstract

Provision of Social Relationship Scale was developed to measure perception of social support according to provision of social relationship by Turner, Frankel & Levin (1983). The purpose of the present study was conducted to determine the validity and reliability of the Provision of Social Relations Scale in Turkish society. The reliability study of the Provision of Social Relations Scale on 1070 primary school students revealed an internal consistency of Cronbach Alpha .81 and a test-retest reliability coefficient of .85. Family support subscale internal consistency of .74, friend support subscale internal consistency of .75 According to the confirmatory factor analysis which is applied for reliability, it was determined that Provision of Social Relations Scale can be accepted as a valid and reliable tool which can be used for primary school secondary degree students.

Keywords

social support provision of social relations primary school secondary degree students

References

  • Alptekin, K. Ve Duyan V. (2009). İntihar ve İntiharı Önleme. İstanbul: Yeni İnsan Yayınevi.
  • Anderson, J.C., . & Gerbing D.W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of- fit indices for maximum likelihood comfirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
  • Barrerra, M. (1986). Distinction between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 413-445.
  • Bates, D. S., & Toro, P. (1999). Developing measures to assess social support among homeless and poor people. Journal of Community Psychology, 27 (2), 137-156.
  • Burke, R. J. & Weir, T. (1978). Benefits to adolescents of informal helping relationships with their parents and peers. Psychological Reports, 42, 1175- 1184.
  • Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom. Med. 38, 300-314.
  • Cohen, S., Underwood, L. & Gottlieb, B. (2000). Social support measurement and intervention a guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press
  • Cole, D.A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 1019-1031.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010).Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınevi
  • Davidson, L. M. (2008). United states and finnish adolescents perceptıon of social support, School Psychology international, 2(3), 363–375.
  • Dilli D, Dallar Y, Çakır İ. (2010). Psychological characteristics of adolescent suicide attempters presenting to a pediatric emergency service. Turk J Med Sci, 40(3): 377-390.
  • Fischer, J., ve Corcoran, K. (1994). Measures for clinical practice: A sourcebook (Vol.2). New York: The Free Press.
  • Frey, C & Riithlisberger C. (1996) Social support in healthy adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25 (1) 17-31 Geçtan, E. (2007). İnsan olmak, (6. Basım). İstanbul: Metis Yayıncılık
  • Greenberg, T., Siegel, J. & Leitch, C. (1983). The nature and importance of attachment relationships to parents and peers during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, 373-386.
  • Grover KE, Green KL, Pettit JW, Monteith LL, Garza MJ, Venta A. (2009). Problem solving moderates the effects of life event stress and chronic stress on suicidal behaviors in adolescence. J Clin Psychol., 65(12):1281-90.
  • Hoffman, M., Ushpiz, V. & Shif, R (1988) Social support and self-esteem in adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence 17 (4) 307-316
  • Hanley, B., Aman, M. & Pace, P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the family support scale with head start families. Journal of Child and Family Studies. (7), 69-77.
  • Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Jöreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
  • Kemp, A., Green, B., Hovawitz, C., & Rawlings, E. (1995). Incidence and correlates of post-traumatic stress disorder in battered women: Shelter and community samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 43-55.
  • Lui, Y.L. (2002). The role of perceived social support and dysfunctional attitudes in predicting Taiwanese adolescents’ depressive tendency. Adolescence, 37 (148), 823-834.
  • Marsh, H.W. & Hocevar, D. (1988). A new more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 107-117.
  • Mitchell, J. C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In Mitchell, J. C. (Ed.), Social networks in urban situations (1-50). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Özçelik, D.A. (2010) Test Hazırlama Klavuzu, PEGEM A Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Saygın, Y. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal destek, benlik saygısı ve öznel iyi oluş düzeylerinin incelenmesi.Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Konya.
  • Schwarzer, R. & Knoll, N. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview, Internatıonal Journal of Psychology, 42 (4), 243–252.
  • Schwarzer, R., Knoll, N. & Rieckmann,N (2003). Social support. In A. Kaptein ve J. Weinman (Eds.). Introduction to health psychology. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Stein, C. H., & Rappaport, J. (1986). Social network interviews as sources of etic and emic data: A study of young married women. In S. E. Hobfoll (Ed.), Stress, social support, and women (pp:47-66). New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
  • Steinberg, L. (2007) Ergenlik (Yayıma Haz. F.Çok). Ankara, İmge Kitapevi Yayınları. (Eserin orjinali 2005’te yayımlandı) Tardy, C. (1985). Social support measurement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 133. 187-202.
  • Turner, R. J., Frankel, B. G., & Levin, D. M. (1983). Social support: conceptualization, measurement, and implications for mental health. In J. R. Greeley (Ed.), Research in community and mental health (67-111). Greenvich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Uchino, B. (2004) Social support and physical health understanding the health consequences of relationships. London: Yale Unıversıty Press
  • Weiss, R. (1974). Provisions of social relationship .In Z. Rubin (Ed), Doing unto others. N.J: Prentice-Hall.
  • Vaux, A. (1988). Social support: Theory, research, and intervention. New York: Praeger.
  • Yıldırım, İ. (1997). Algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi, güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi , 13, 81-87.
  • Yıldırım, İ. (2004). Algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin revizyonu. Eurasian Journal Of Educational Research 17, 221-236. Yıldırım, İ. (2006). Akademik başarının yordayıcısı olarak gündelik sıkıntılar ve sosyal destek. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 258-267.
  • Yıldırım, İ. ve Kaya, M. (2009). Üniversite adaylarının anne-babalarına uygulanan sosyal destek programının eş desteği ve adayın aileden algıladığı desteğe etkisi. (TÜBİTAK Proje Raporu, Proje No.107K248). Ankara
  • Zanı, B., Bosma, H., Zıjsling, D., & Honess, T. (2001). Family context and the development of adolescent decision-making. In J. E. Nurmi (Ed.), Navigating through adolescence (199-229). London, RoutledgeFalmer
  • Zimet, G.D., Dahlem, N.W., Zimet S.G., & Farley, G.K. (1988) The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess, 52. 30-41.

Sosyal İlişki Unsurları Ölçeği'nin Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması

Year 2013, Volume: 44 Issue: 44, 159 - 169, 01.06.2013

Veli Duyan Selahattin Gelbal Esra Çalik Var

Abstract

Sosyal İlişki Unsurları Ölçeği, bireylerin sosyal destek algılarını sosyal ilişki unsurlarına göre ölçmek amacıyla Turner, Frankel ve Levin (1983) tarafından geliştirilmiştir. Bu çalışma, Sosyal İlişki Unsurları Ölçeği’nin Türkiye için geçerliğini ve güvenirliğini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Sosyal İlişki Unsurları Ölçeği 1070 ilköğretim öğrencisi üzerinde uygulanmış, Cronbach Alpha değeri .81 ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği ise .85 olarak bulunmuştur. Alt boyutlardan aile desteği için Cronbach Alpha değeri .74, arkadaş desteği alt boyutu için Cronbach Alpha değeri .75 bulunmuştur Geçerlik için yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi Sosyal İlişki Unsurları Ölçeği’nin ilköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencileri için geçerli ve güvenilir olduğunu göstermiştir.

Keywords

sosyal destek sosyal ilişki unsurları ilköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencileri

References

  • Alptekin, K. Ve Duyan V. (2009). İntihar ve İntiharı Önleme. İstanbul: Yeni İnsan Yayınevi.
  • Anderson, J.C., . & Gerbing D.W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of- fit indices for maximum likelihood comfirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
  • Barrerra, M. (1986). Distinction between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 413-445.
  • Bates, D. S., & Toro, P. (1999). Developing measures to assess social support among homeless and poor people. Journal of Community Psychology, 27 (2), 137-156.
  • Burke, R. J. & Weir, T. (1978). Benefits to adolescents of informal helping relationships with their parents and peers. Psychological Reports, 42, 1175- 1184.
  • Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom. Med. 38, 300-314.
  • Cohen, S., Underwood, L. & Gottlieb, B. (2000). Social support measurement and intervention a guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press
  • Cole, D.A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 1019-1031.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010).Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınevi
  • Davidson, L. M. (2008). United states and finnish adolescents perceptıon of social support, School Psychology international, 2(3), 363–375.
  • Dilli D, Dallar Y, Çakır İ. (2010). Psychological characteristics of adolescent suicide attempters presenting to a pediatric emergency service. Turk J Med Sci, 40(3): 377-390.
  • Fischer, J., ve Corcoran, K. (1994). Measures for clinical practice: A sourcebook (Vol.2). New York: The Free Press.
  • Frey, C & Riithlisberger C. (1996) Social support in healthy adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25 (1) 17-31 Geçtan, E. (2007). İnsan olmak, (6. Basım). İstanbul: Metis Yayıncılık
  • Greenberg, T., Siegel, J. & Leitch, C. (1983). The nature and importance of attachment relationships to parents and peers during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, 373-386.
  • Grover KE, Green KL, Pettit JW, Monteith LL, Garza MJ, Venta A. (2009). Problem solving moderates the effects of life event stress and chronic stress on suicidal behaviors in adolescence. J Clin Psychol., 65(12):1281-90.
  • Hoffman, M., Ushpiz, V. & Shif, R (1988) Social support and self-esteem in adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence 17 (4) 307-316
  • Hanley, B., Aman, M. & Pace, P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the family support scale with head start families. Journal of Child and Family Studies. (7), 69-77.
  • Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Jöreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
  • Kemp, A., Green, B., Hovawitz, C., & Rawlings, E. (1995). Incidence and correlates of post-traumatic stress disorder in battered women: Shelter and community samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 43-55.
  • Lui, Y.L. (2002). The role of perceived social support and dysfunctional attitudes in predicting Taiwanese adolescents’ depressive tendency. Adolescence, 37 (148), 823-834.
  • Marsh, H.W. & Hocevar, D. (1988). A new more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 107-117.
  • Mitchell, J. C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In Mitchell, J. C. (Ed.), Social networks in urban situations (1-50). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Özçelik, D.A. (2010) Test Hazırlama Klavuzu, PEGEM A Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Saygın, Y. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal destek, benlik saygısı ve öznel iyi oluş düzeylerinin incelenmesi.Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Konya.
  • Schwarzer, R. & Knoll, N. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview, Internatıonal Journal of Psychology, 42 (4), 243–252.
  • Schwarzer, R., Knoll, N. & Rieckmann,N (2003). Social support. In A. Kaptein ve J. Weinman (Eds.). Introduction to health psychology. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Stein, C. H., & Rappaport, J. (1986). Social network interviews as sources of etic and emic data: A study of young married women. In S. E. Hobfoll (Ed.), Stress, social support, and women (pp:47-66). New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
  • Steinberg, L. (2007) Ergenlik (Yayıma Haz. F.Çok). Ankara, İmge Kitapevi Yayınları. (Eserin orjinali 2005’te yayımlandı) Tardy, C. (1985). Social support measurement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 133. 187-202.
  • Turner, R. J., Frankel, B. G., & Levin, D. M. (1983). Social support: conceptualization, measurement, and implications for mental health. In J. R. Greeley (Ed.), Research in community and mental health (67-111). Greenvich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Uchino, B. (2004) Social support and physical health understanding the health consequences of relationships. London: Yale Unıversıty Press
  • Weiss, R. (1974). Provisions of social relationship .In Z. Rubin (Ed), Doing unto others. N.J: Prentice-Hall.
  • Vaux, A. (1988). Social support: Theory, research, and intervention. New York: Praeger.
  • Yıldırım, İ. (1997). Algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi, güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi , 13, 81-87.
  • Yıldırım, İ. (2004). Algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin revizyonu. Eurasian Journal Of Educational Research 17, 221-236. Yıldırım, İ. (2006). Akademik başarının yordayıcısı olarak gündelik sıkıntılar ve sosyal destek. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 258-267.
  • Yıldırım, İ. ve Kaya, M. (2009). Üniversite adaylarının anne-babalarına uygulanan sosyal destek programının eş desteği ve adayın aileden algıladığı desteğe etkisi. (TÜBİTAK Proje Raporu, Proje No.107K248). Ankara
  • Zanı, B., Bosma, H., Zıjsling, D., & Honess, T. (2001). Family context and the development of adolescent decision-making. In J. E. Nurmi (Ed.), Navigating through adolescence (199-229). London, RoutledgeFalmer
  • Zimet, G.D., Dahlem, N.W., Zimet S.G., & Farley, G.K. (1988) The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess, 52. 30-41.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Veli Duyan This is me

Selahattin Gelbal This is me

Esra Çalik Var This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 44 Issue: 44

Cite

APA Duyan, V., Gelbal, S., & Var, E. Ç. (2013). Sosyal İlişki Unsurları Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(44), 159-169.