Evaluation of Performance Management in State Schools: A Case of North Cyprus

Year 2011, Volume: 40 Issue: 40, 33 - 43, 01.06.2011

Hakan Atamtürk A Fahriye Aksal A Zehra Gazi A Nurdan Atamtürk

Abstract

Ararma, Kuzey K br s Türk Cumhuriyeti devlet okullarn performans yönetimi açndan de erlendirilmesini temel almaktad r. Bu araalg larde erlendirilmesini hedef almas yla özgün bir niteli e sahiptir. Araveriler elde edilmi , veriler SPSS program na bagöre anlaml farklmüdür ve 237 ö retmen olu turmaktad r. Arave müdürlerin performans yönetimine ili kin fark ndalperformans hedeflerinin planlanmas , raporlama i lemine ili kin görü ler, performans de erlendirme, ödül ve ceza, bireyselperformans ve örgüt kültürü ili kisi aras nda anlaml fark oldu u ortaya ç km

Keywords

k dem, mesleki geli im, performans yönetimi, ortaokul

References

• Alpargu, N. (1999). Performans de÷erleme. Retrieved April 11, 2001, from Http://www.treasury.gov.tr/anadolu/nergis.html.
• Amaratunga, D., & Baldry, D. (2003). A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance. Property Management, 21, 171–189.
• Armstrong, M. (1996). Employee reward. London: Institute of Personnel and Development (IPD) House.
• Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (1998). Performance management, The New Realities. London : Institute of Personnel and Development.
• Balci, A. (1995). Sosyal bilimlerde araúWirma. Ankara: 72TDFO Bilgisayar Yayin. L.t.d.
• Barber, M. (2000). High expectations and standards for all – no matter what, Times Educational Supplement.
• Barutcugil, I. (2002). Performans yönetimi. Istanbul: Kariyer Developer.
• Bostanci, B. (2004). Türkiye’deki resmi ve özel ilkögretim okullarinda ögretmen performans yönetimi. Doktora Tezi, Ankara.
• Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
• Buchner, T. W. (2007). Performance management theory: A look from the performer's perspective with implications for HRD, Human Resource Development International, 10: 1, 59 — 73.
• Cheng, M., Dainty, A. R. J., & Moore, D. R. (2007). A multifaceted performance excellence framework for project-based organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Development and Management, 7(3/4), 254-275.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. USA: Routledge Falmer.
• Coúkun, A. (2005). Iúletmelerde performans yönetimi: Bir yönetim muhasebesi araci olarak performans karnesi. Doktora tezi, Istanbul Üniversitesi, Istanbul.
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. United Kingdom: SAGE.
• Crouch, L., & Mabogoane, T. (2001). No magic bullets, just tracer bullets: The role of learning resources, social advantage, and education management in improving the performance of South African schools, Social Dynamics, 27: 1, 6078.
• Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (1997). Organization development and change, (6th ed.). USA: ITP.
• Cutler, T., & Waine, B. (2001). Developments: Report: Performance management—The key to higher standards in schools?. Public Money & Management, 21: 2, 69 — 72.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Teacher professionalism, why and how?, in Lieberman, A (ed.) Schools as collaborative cultures: creating the future now. London: Falmer.
• Down, B. Chadbourne, R., & Hogan, C. (1999). How are teachers managing performance management ? . Asia Pasific Journal of Teacher Education. 28 (3). 213-223.
• Down, B., Hogan, C., & Chadbourne, R. (1999). Making sense of performance assessment: official rhetoric and teachers’ reality. Asia- Pasific Journal of Teacher Education. 27 (1), 11-24.
• Edwards, M. R., & Ewen, A. J. (1996). How to manage performance and pay with 360 degree feedback. Compensation & Benefits Review , 28 (3) , 41.
• Fitzgerald, T. (2000). Middle managers in secondary schools: who are they and what do they need to know?. New Zealand Journal of Educational Administration, 15, 71–75.
• Fitzgerald, T., Youngs, H., & Grootenboer, P. (2003). Bureaucratic control or professional autonomy? : Performance management in Vew Tealand schools. School Leadership & Management, 23(1), 91-105.
• Grootenboer, P. (2003). Appraisal for quality learning. Waikato Journal of Education, 6, 121–32.
• Gutteridge, T. G. (1986). Organizational career development systems: The state of the practice. In D. T. Hall and Associates , Career Development in Organizations. London: Jossey – Bass.
• Haynes, G., Wragg, T., Wragg, C., & Chamberlin, R. (2003). Performance management for teachers: Headteachers' perspectives. School Leadership & Management, 23: 1, 75.
• Hume , d. A. (1995) . Reward management (Employee performance, motivation and pay). Combrigge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
• Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R., & Aouad, G. (2001). Performance management in construction: A conceptual framework. Construction Management and Economics, 19: 1, 85 — 95.
• Marsick, U. J., & Watkins , K. E. (1997). Lessons from incidental and informal learning. In J. Burgoyne, & M. Reynolds (eds.), In Management learning : Integrating perspectives in theory and practice .Thossand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Marsap, A. (2000). Yönetsel sistem. Ankara: Öncü Basimevi.
• Mwita J. I. (2000). Performance management model. A system –based aproach to public service quality. The International Journal of Public Sector Management . Volume: 13, Number 1, pp, 19–37 ISSN 0951-3558.
• Öztekin A. (2006). Orta ögretim kurumlarinda görev yapan yöneticilerin duygusal zeka becerilerini okul yönetiminde kullanma düzeylerinin degerlendirilmesi. (Balikesir Örnegi). Yüksek lisans tezi, Balikesir Üniversitesi, Balikesir. s.14- 15, 25-30.
• Palmer, M. J. (1993). Performans degerlendirmesi.Istanbul: Rota Yayinlari.
• Pretorius, SG, & Ngwenya, VC (2008). Teachers' perceptions of and attitudes towards performance appraisal in Zimbabwean schools. Africa Education Review, 5: 1, 144 — 164.
• Randall, C. (2009). Effective teachers in primary schools: a reflective resource for performance management. Professional Development in Education, 35: 3, 502 — 503.
• Rhodes, C. P., & Beneicke, S. (2002). Coaching, mentoring and peer - networking : Challenges for the management of teacher professional development in schools, Journal of In - Service Education, 28, 2, 297-309.
• Silcock, P. (2002). Can we manage teacher performance?. Education 3-13, 30: 3, 23 — 27.
• Storey, A. (2002). Performance management in schools: Could the balanced scorecard help?. School Leadership and Management, 22: 3, 321 — 338.
• Tomlinson, H. (2000). Proposals for performance related pay in English schools. School Leadership and Management, 20 (3), pp 281-298.
• Waal, A. , Hafizi, R. , Rahbar, A. H., & Rowshan, S. (2010). Studying performance management in Iran using an adapted performance management analysis. Journal of Transnational Management, 15: 3, 246 — 264.
• Williams, R. S. (1998). Performance management: Perspectives on employer performance. International Thomson Business Press.
• Yüksel, M. (2006). Duygusal zeka ve performans iliúkisi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.