Video-Durumlarda Yansıma Noktalarının ve Tartışma Gruplarında Öğretmen Katılımının Yansıtıcı Düşünmeye Etkisi

Year 2011, Volume: 40 Issue: 40, 321 - 331, 01.06.2011

Hüseyin Özçınar Deniz Deryakulu

Abstract

Bu ararma, video-durumlar n uzman yorumlar yla zenginle tirilmesinin ve video-durumlar n tartlmas için olu turulan çevrimiçi tart ma gruplar nda ö retmen adaylar ile ö retmenlerin birlikte bulunmalaradaylaryürütülmü tür. Ara

Keywords

duruma-dayal ö retim, yans dü ünme düzeyi üzerinde anlaml bir etki yaratmamr

References

• Ball, D.L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond and G. Skyes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning professional: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., & Pedretti, E. ( 2001). Multi-media case methods in pre-service science education: Enabling an apprenticeship for praxis. Science Education, 31, 191-209.
• Büyüköztürk, . (1997). ki faktörlü varyans analizi. Ankara Üniversitesi E itim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1), 141-58.
• Clark, C. M. (1986). Ten years of conceptual development in research on teacher thinking. In M. Ben-Peretz, R.
• Bromme, and R. Halkes (Eds.), Advances of research on teacher thinking (pp.7-21) Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
• Coffin, C., & Hewings, A. (2005). Engaging electronically: Using CMC to develop students' argumentation skills in higher education. Language and Education, 19(1), 32–49
• Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (1993). Shattered images: Understanding expectations and realities of field experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(6), 457-471
• Costa, A.L., & Callick, B. (2000). Activating and engaging habits of mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Dolen, W.M., van, Dabholkar, P.A., & Ruyter, J. (2007) . Satisfaction with online commercial group chat: The influence of perceived technology attributes, chat group characteristics, and advisor communication style. Journal of Retailing, 83(3), 339-358.
• Galvez-Martin, M., Bowman, C. L., & Morrison, M. (1998). An exploratory study of the level of reflection attained by preservice teachers. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 9(2), 19-25
• Goodlad, J. I. (1990). Places where teachers are taught. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
• Gunawardena, C.N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 147–166.
• Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and mplementation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49
• John, M. St. & Stokes, L. (2003). Opening windows onto classrooms: Promises and challenges in the design of video cases for professional development in mathematics and science. Retrieved October 20, 2008 from http://www.inverness-research.org/report /ab_videocasesconf.htm.
• Jones, Q. (2000, March). Time to split, virtually: Expanding virtual publics into vibrant virtual metropolises. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Press
• Kagan, D. M., & Tippins, D. J. (1992). The evolution of functional lesson plans among twelve elementary and secondary school teachers. Elementary School Journal, 92(4), 477-489.
• Kember, D. (1999). Determining the level of reflective thinking from students' written journals using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18(1), 18-30.
• Korthagen, F. A. J. (2001, April). Linking Practice and theory: The Pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
• Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17.
• Lee, H. (2008). Students’ Perceptions of Peer and Self Assessment in a Higher Education Online Collaborative Learning Environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, ABD.
• Masingila, J., & Doerr, H. (2002). Understanding pre-service teachers emerging practices through their analyses of a multimedia case study of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 235-263.
• Merseth, K. (1996). Cases and case methods in teacher education. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp.722-744). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
• Peng, H., & Fiztzgerald, G. H. (2006). Relationship between teacher education students epistemological beliefs and their learning outcomes in a case based learning environment. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 255-285
• Powell, R. (2000). Case-based teaching in homogeneous teacher education contexts: A study of pre-service teachers’ situative cognition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(3), 389–410.
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2000). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8–22.
• Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 123-140.
• Shulman, J. H. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 50– 63). New York: Teachers College Press.
• Sparks-Langer, G.M., Simmons, J.M., Pasch, M., Colton, A., & Starko, A. (1990). Reflective pedagogical thinking: How can we promote it and measure it? Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 23-32
• Stacey, E., & Gerbic, P. (2003). Investigating the impact of computer conferencing: Content analysis as a manageable tool. Retrievet February 15, 2009 from http://www.deakin.edu.au/dro/view/DU:30005105.
• Van den Berg, E., & Visscher-Voerman, J. I. A. (2000). Multimedia cases in elementary science education: Design and development of a prototype. Education and Information Technology, 5(2), 119-132.
• Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54, 143–178
• Wever, D. B., Schellens T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46, 6-28
• Williams, M. A. (2004). Explor ng the effects of a mult med a case based learn ng env ronment in preservice science teacher education in jamaica. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Netherland.
• Zeichner, K., & Tabachnick, R. (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education washed out by school experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3),3-11.