BibTex RIS Cite

Öğrenci Yönetimli Çevrimiçi Tartışmalara Katılımın Yönetme Sorumluluğu Ve Öğrenme Stilleri Açısından İncelenmesi

Year 2011, Volume: 41 Issue: 41, - , 01.06.2011

Abstract

References

  • Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (1996). Etkili öğrenme ve öğretme. İzmir: Kanyılmaz Matbaası
  • Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2008). A study of students’ perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (1), 183-193.
  • Alavi, M., & Dufner, D. (2005). Technology-mediated collaborative learning: a research perspective. In S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 191–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ataizi, M. (2002, Mayıs). Yapıcı Öğrenme Çevreleri. Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitim Sempozyumu, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Açıköğretim Fakültesi, Yunusemre Kampusü, Eskişehir, http://aof20.anadolu.edu.tr/bildiriler/Murat_Ataizi.doc
  • Aşkar, P. ve Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb öğrenme stili envanteri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 87, s.37-47.
  • Bento, R., & Schuster, C. (2003). Participation: The online challenge. In A. Aggarwal (Ed.), Web-based education: Learning from experience (pp. 156–164). Hershey, Pennsylvania: Idea Group Publishing.
  • Citera, M. (1998). Distributed teamwork: the impact of communication media on inuence and decision quality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 9, 792–800.
  • Erdem, M. (2009). Effects of learning style profile of team on quality of materials developed in collaborative learning processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10 (2), 154-171.
  • Gencel Evin, İ. (2006). Öğrenme stilleri, deneyimsel öğrenme kuramına dayalı eğitim ve sosyal bilgiler program hedeflerine erişi düzeyi (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, 2006). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Hart, G. (1995, December). Learning styles and hypertext: Exploring user attitude. Paper presented at the ASCILITE 1995 Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Ho, S. (2002, July). Evaluating students' participation in on-line discussions. Paper presented at the Australian World Wide Web Conference (AUSWEB), Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia. http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw02/papers/refereed/ho/paper.html
  • Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52, 78–82.
  • Jonassen, D. H., Peck K. L., & Wilson B. G. (1999). Learning with technology, a constructivist Perspective. Prentice Hall
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1999) Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models, A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Volume II (pp. 215-239). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
  • Kılıç, E., ve Karadeniz, Ş. (2004). Cinsiyet ve öğrenme stilinin gezinme stratejisi ve başarıya etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24 (3), 129-146.
  • Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
  • Kolb, D.A. (1985). LSI learning-style inventory. McBer & Company, Training Resources Group, 116 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02116.
  • Lu, H., Jia, L., Gong, S.H., & Clark, B. (2007). The relationship of kolb learning styles, online learning behaviors and learning outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 187-196.
  • Masters, K., & Oberprieler, G. (2004). Encouraging equitable online participation through curriculum articulation. Computers & Education, 42 (4), 319-332.
  • Peker, M. (2003). Kolb öğrenme stili modeli. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 157, 185-192.
  • Prinsen, F. R., Volman, M.L.L., Terwel, J. & van den Eeden P. (2009). Effects on participation of an experimental CSCL programme to support elaboration: do all students benet? Computers & Education, 52, 113–125.
  • Terrell, S.R. (2002). The effect of learning style on doctoral course completion in a web-based learning environment. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 345–352.
  • Wilson, B., Lowry, M., (2001). Constructivist learning on the web, in Burge, E. J., (Ed). The strategic use of learning technologies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Yang, D. & Richardson, J.C. (2008). Students’ online interaction styles: can they change? Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 1 (1), 1-11
  • Yenice N., Saracaloğlu A.S. (2009). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının öğrenme stilleri ile fen başarıları arasındaki ilişki. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 1, 162-173.
  • Von Cranach, M. (1996). Toward a theory of the acting group, in E. H. Witte and J. H. Davis (eds) Understanding Group Behavior: Small Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations. 2:147–88, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Year 2011, Volume: 41 Issue: 41, - , 01.06.2011

Abstract

References

  • Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (1996). Etkili öğrenme ve öğretme. İzmir: Kanyılmaz Matbaası
  • Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2008). A study of students’ perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (1), 183-193.
  • Alavi, M., & Dufner, D. (2005). Technology-mediated collaborative learning: a research perspective. In S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 191–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ataizi, M. (2002, Mayıs). Yapıcı Öğrenme Çevreleri. Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitim Sempozyumu, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Açıköğretim Fakültesi, Yunusemre Kampusü, Eskişehir, http://aof20.anadolu.edu.tr/bildiriler/Murat_Ataizi.doc
  • Aşkar, P. ve Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb öğrenme stili envanteri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 87, s.37-47.
  • Bento, R., & Schuster, C. (2003). Participation: The online challenge. In A. Aggarwal (Ed.), Web-based education: Learning from experience (pp. 156–164). Hershey, Pennsylvania: Idea Group Publishing.
  • Citera, M. (1998). Distributed teamwork: the impact of communication media on inuence and decision quality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 9, 792–800.
  • Erdem, M. (2009). Effects of learning style profile of team on quality of materials developed in collaborative learning processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10 (2), 154-171.
  • Gencel Evin, İ. (2006). Öğrenme stilleri, deneyimsel öğrenme kuramına dayalı eğitim ve sosyal bilgiler program hedeflerine erişi düzeyi (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, 2006). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Hart, G. (1995, December). Learning styles and hypertext: Exploring user attitude. Paper presented at the ASCILITE 1995 Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Ho, S. (2002, July). Evaluating students' participation in on-line discussions. Paper presented at the Australian World Wide Web Conference (AUSWEB), Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia. http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw02/papers/refereed/ho/paper.html
  • Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52, 78–82.
  • Jonassen, D. H., Peck K. L., & Wilson B. G. (1999). Learning with technology, a constructivist Perspective. Prentice Hall
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1999) Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models, A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Volume II (pp. 215-239). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
  • Kılıç, E., ve Karadeniz, Ş. (2004). Cinsiyet ve öğrenme stilinin gezinme stratejisi ve başarıya etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24 (3), 129-146.
  • Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
  • Kolb, D.A. (1985). LSI learning-style inventory. McBer & Company, Training Resources Group, 116 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02116.
  • Lu, H., Jia, L., Gong, S.H., & Clark, B. (2007). The relationship of kolb learning styles, online learning behaviors and learning outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 187-196.
  • Masters, K., & Oberprieler, G. (2004). Encouraging equitable online participation through curriculum articulation. Computers & Education, 42 (4), 319-332.
  • Peker, M. (2003). Kolb öğrenme stili modeli. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 157, 185-192.
  • Prinsen, F. R., Volman, M.L.L., Terwel, J. & van den Eeden P. (2009). Effects on participation of an experimental CSCL programme to support elaboration: do all students benet? Computers & Education, 52, 113–125.
  • Terrell, S.R. (2002). The effect of learning style on doctoral course completion in a web-based learning environment. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 345–352.
  • Wilson, B., Lowry, M., (2001). Constructivist learning on the web, in Burge, E. J., (Ed). The strategic use of learning technologies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Yang, D. & Richardson, J.C. (2008). Students’ online interaction styles: can they change? Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 1 (1), 1-11
  • Yenice N., Saracaloğlu A.S. (2009). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının öğrenme stilleri ile fen başarıları arasındaki ilişki. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 1, 162-173.
  • Von Cranach, M. (1996). Toward a theory of the acting group, in E. H. Witte and J. H. Davis (eds) Understanding Group Behavior: Small Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations. 2:147–88, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Ferhat Kadir Pala This is me

Mukaddes Erdem This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 41 Issue: 41

Cite

APA Pala, F. K., & Erdem, M. (2011). Öğrenci Yönetimli Çevrimiçi Tartışmalara Katılımın Yönetme Sorumluluğu Ve Öğrenme Stilleri Açısından İncelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(41).