Uluslararası Dergilerde Yayınlanan Türkiye Adresli Bakım Yükü Araştırmalarının Bibliyometrik Analizi

Year 2022, , 133 - 141, 31.08.2022

Fadime Hatice İnci

https://doi.org/10.31125/hunhemsire.1167234

Abstract

Amaç: Araştırmanın amacı “Web of Science” veri tabanında indekslenmiş ve Türkiye’de yapılmış bakım yükü çalışmalarının bibliyometrik olarak test edilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırma tanımlayıcı tarama çalışmasıdır. Araştırma kapsamına 2009- 2021 tarihlerinde “Web of Science” veri tabanına kayıtlı Türkiye’de yapılmış çalışmalar alınmıştır. Anahtar kelime olarak “caregiver burden”, “care burden”, caregiving burden”, “burden of care”, “burden of caregiving”, kelime dizinlerinin her biri veri tabanında ayrı ayrı olarak taranmıştır. Dahil olma ölçütlerine uyan 121 çalışma örnekleme alınmıştır. Veri analizi Microsoft Excell ve VOSviewer programı (version 1.6.16) kullanılarak yapılmıştır.
Bulgular: Çalışmalar en sık şizofren, kanser ve alzheimer hastasına bakım veren bireyler ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. “Caregiverburden” en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimedir. En çok atıf alan çalışma ise Gülseren ve arkadaşları tarafından gerçekleştirilen “The perceived burden of care and its correlates in schizophrenia” isimli çalışmadır.
Sonuç: Bu çalışma bakım yükü alanında Türkiye’de yapılmış olan çalışmalar arasında, en çok atıf almış çalışmalar, en çok kullanılan anahtar kelimeler, alanda çalışılmış konular ve en çok kullanılan kaynaklar konusunda araştırmacılara yol gösterici olacaktır.

Keywords

Atıf analizi, bakım yükü, bibliyometrik analiz

Bibliometric Analysis of Turkey-based Caregiver Burden Studies Published in International Journals

Abstract

Aim: The study aim was to bibliometrically test the caregiver burden studies carried out in Turkey and indexed in the Web of Science database.
Material and Methods: This was a descriptive screening study. The studies carried out in Turkey and registered in the Web of Science database between 2009-2021 were included. Each of the word indexes, including “caregiver burden”, “care burden”, caregiving burden”, “burden of care” and “burden of caregiving”, was separately screened as the keywords. One hundred twenty-one studies that met the inclusion criteria of the study were enrolled in the sample. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excell and the VOSviewer program (version 1.6.16).
Results: The studies were mainly carried out with the individuals who were caregiving to schizophrenia, cancer, and alzheimer's patients. “Caregiver burden” was the most frequently used keyword. The most cited study was entitled “The perceived burden of care and its correlates in schizophrenia” which was conducted by Gulseren et al.
Conclusion: This study will guide researchers on the most cited studies, the most used keywords, the topics studied in this field, and the most used references among the caregiver burden studies performed in Turkey.

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis, caregiver burden, citation analysis

References

• Andres A. Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study. Oxford: Chandos Publishing; 2009. 1–169 p.
• Todeschini R, Baccini A. Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on dietary and lifestyle behaviours among adolescents in Palestine. Weinheim: John Wiley & Sons; 2016. 512 p.
• Suzman R, Beard JR, Boerma T, Chatterji S. Health in an ageing world—what do we know? Lancet. 2015;385(9967):484–6.
• Hermanns M, Mastel-Smith B. Caregiving: A qualitative concept analysis. Qual Rep. 2015; 17(75):1–18.
• Bastawrous M. Caregiver burden—A critical discussion. Int J Nurs. 2013;50(3):431–41.
• Amankwaa B. Informal caregiver stress. ABNF J. 2017;28(4):92–5.
• Uğur Ö, Fadıloğlu ZÇ. Kanser hastasına bakım verenlere uygulanan planlı eğitimin bakım veren yükü üzerine etkisi. Cumhur Hemşirelik Derg. 2012;1(2):53–8.
• Liu Z, Heffernan C, Tan J. Caregiver burden: A concept analysis. Int J Nurs Sci. 2020;7(4):438–45.
• Giménez-Espert M del C, Prado-Gascó VJ. Bibliometric analysis of six nursing journals from the Web of Science, 2012-2017. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(3):543–54. doi: 10.1111/jan.13868.
• Kantek F, Yesilbas H. Conflict in nursing studies: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited papers. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(10):2531–46.
• Dong J, Wei W, Wang C, Fu Y, Li Y, Li J, et al. Research trends and hotspots in caregiver studies: A bibliometric and scientometric analysis of nursing journals. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(11):2955–70.
• Huang Q, Ronghuang Q, Yinhuang R, Fanghuang Y, Yansun H. Trends and hotspots of family nursing research based on Web of Science: A bibliometric analysis. Japan J Nurs Sci. 2021;18(2):e12401.
• Choi S, Seo JY. An exploratory study of the research on caregiver depression: using bibliometrics and LDA topic modeling. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020;41(7):592–601.
• Shi H, Mao C, Tang J, Liang H. Research on the health of and interventions for family caregivers of people with dementia: A bibliometric analysis of research output during 1988-2018. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):1–
• Chen C. Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. J Data Inf Sci. 2017;2(2):1–40.
• Jan van Eck N, Waltman L. VOSviewer manual: manual for VOSviewer version 1 .6.16. Univeristeit Leiden; 2020. 1–53 p.
• Hamurcu M, Üniversitesi K, Bölümü EM. Science Citation Index (SCI) kapsamında dergi seçimi için analitik ağ süreci yönteminin kullanılması. Harran Üniversitesi Mühendislik Derg. 2017;2(2):54–70.
• Hoffmann RL, Mitchell AM. Caregiver Burden: Historical Development. Nurs Forum. 1998;33(4):5–12.
• Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: Correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980;20(6):649–55.
• İnci FH, Erdem M. Bakım verme yükü ölçeği̇’ni̇n Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Derg. 2008;11(4):85–95.
• Tamizi Z, Fallahi-Khoshknab M, Dalvandi A, Mohammadi-Shahboulaghi F, Mohammadi E, Bakhshi E. Defining the concept of family caregiver burden in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):289.
• Llanque S, Savage L, Rosenburg N, Caserta M. Concept Analysis: Alzheimer’s Caregiver Stress. Nurs Forum. 2016;51(1):21–31.
• Choi S, Seo J. Analysis of caregiver burden in palliative care: An integrated review. Nurs Forum. 2019;54(2):280–90.
• Nagata C, Yada H, Inagaki J. Exploration of the Factor Structure of the Burden Experienced by Individuals Providing End-of-Life Care at Home. Nurs Res Pract. 2018;2018:1–9.
• Orak O, Sezgin S. The investigation of caregiver burden in family members of cancer patients. J Psychiatr Nurs. 2015;6(1):33-39.
• Akgul N, Ozdemir L. Caregiver burden among primary caregivers of patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: A cross sectional study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(4):372–7.
• Yildiz E, Karakaş SA, Güngörmüş Z, Cengiz M. Levels of care burden and self-efficacy for informal caregiver of patients with cancer. Holist Nurs Pract. 2017;31(1):7–15.
• Deniz H, Inci F. Caregivers of leukemia and lymphoma patients following peripheric stem cell transplantation. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015;33(3):250–62.
• Gülseren L, Çam B, Karakoç B, Danaci AE, Çubukçuoğlu Z, Taş C, et al. The perceived burden of care and its correlates in schizophrenia. Turkish J Psychiatry. 2010;21(3):203–12.
• Tanrıverdi D, Ekinci M. The effect psychoeducation intervention has on the caregiving burden of caregivers for schizophrenic patients in Turkey. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012 Jun;18(3):281–8.
• Durmaz H, Okanlı A. Investigation of the effect of self-efficacy levels of caregiver family members of the individuals with schizophrenia on burden of care. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2014;28(4):290–4.
• Aydin A, Eker SS, Cangur S, Sarandol A, Kirli S. The association of the level of caregiver burden with the sociodemographic variables and the characteristics of the disorder in schizophrenic patients. Archıves of Neuropsychıatry. 2009;46:10–4.
• Cil Akinci A, Pinar R. Validity and reliability of Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale among family caregivers of haemodialysis patients. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(3–4):352–60.
• Avsar U, Avsar UZ, Cansever Z, Set T, Cankaya E, Kaya A, et al. Psychological and emotional status, and caregiver burden in caregivers of patients with peritoneal dialysis compared with caregivers of patients with renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2013;45(3):883–6.
• Cantekin I, Kavurmacı M, Tan M. An analysis of caregiver burden of patients with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Hemodial Int. 2016;20(1):94–7.
• Mollaoǧlu M, Kayataş M, Yürügen B. Effects on caregiver burden of education related to home care in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Hemodial Int. 2013;17(3):413–20.
• Avşar U, Avşar UZ, Cansever Z, Yucel A, Cankaya E, Certez H, et al. Caregiver burden, anxiety, depression, and sleep quality differences in caregivers of hemodialysis patients compared with renal transplant patients. Transplant Proc. 2015;47(5):1388-91.