Validity and Reliability of the Work-Family Balance Scale among Turkish Academicians

Year 2023, , 60 - 69, 31.03.2023

Zehra Gök Metin , Edagül Durmaz Esra Akı

https://doi.org/10.31125/hunhemsire.1273044

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to adapt the Work-Family Balance Scale to Turkish and test its validity and reliability.
Material and Methods: This methodological study was conducted with 134 academicians. The data were collected through an online survey using the Academician Information Form and the Work-Family Balance Scale. The scale was finalized and back-translated following expert opinions. Confirmatory factor analysis was carried out for the construct validity, and content validity was performed. Test-retest and Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient was used for the reliability.
Results: The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was found as 0.89. The test-retest analysis of the study was conducted with 42 participants, and no significant difference was found between the test-retest reliability (t= 1.126, p=0.197). Pearson's correlation coefficient was also found (r=0.83, p<0.001). The content validity index was 0.94. According to factor analysis, the factor loads ranged from 0.64 to 0.87. The explained variance was found to be 68.70%, and the structure of the scale was one-dimensional and consistent with the original version. The model’s comparative fit indexes, χ2/SD (2.29) (<2), and GFI (0.95) (>0.90) were found between acceptable.
Conclusion: The scale was valid and reliable for Turkish academicians, and the results should be confirmed in different employee groups.

Keywords

Academician, occupational health, scale, validity, work-family balance

Türk Akademisyenlerde İş-Aile Dengesi Ölçeği’nin Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği

Abstract

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, İş-Aile Dengesi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanarak geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin test edilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu metodolojik araştırma 134 akademisyen ile yürütülmüştür. Veriler, online anket yolu ile Akademisyen Bilgi Formu ve İş-Aile Dengesi Ölçeği-Türkçe kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Uzman görüşü alınarak İş-Aile Dengesi Ölçeği-Türkçenin son hali verilmiş ve geri-çeviri yapılmıştır. Dil ve kapsam geçerliği yapılan ölçeğin Türkçe versiyonunun yapı geçerliği için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirliği için test-tekrar test ve Cronbach alfa iç tutarlılık katsayısı kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Ölçeğin Cronbach alfa değeri 0.89 olarak belirlenmiştir. Çalışmanın test-tekrar analizi 42 katılımcı ile yapılmış ve iki ölçüm arasında anlamlı bir fark olmadığı bulunmuştur (t= 1.126, p=0.197). Test- tekrar test güvenirliği için Pearson korelasyon katsayısı sonucu (r=0.83, p<0.001) bulunmuştur. Kapsam geçerlik indeksinin 0.94 olduğu hesaplanmıştır. Faktör analizine göre, faktör yükleri 0.64-0.87 arasında değişmektedir. Açıklanan varyans %68.70 olarak bulunmuş, ölçeğin yapısının tek boyutlu ve orijinaliyle tutarlı olduğu görülmüştür. Karşılaştırmalı uyum indekslerinin, χ2/SD (2.29) (<2) ve GFI (0.95) (>0.90), kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür.
Sonuç: İş-Aile Dengesi Ölçeği’nin Türk akademisyenlerde geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğe yönelik sonuçların farklı çalışan gruplarında doğrulanmalıdır.

Keywords

Akademisyen, iş-aile dengesi, iş sağlığı, ölçek, geçerlik

References

• Hirschi A, Shockley KM, Zacher H. Achieving work-family balance: An action regulation model. Academy of Management Review. 2019;44(1):150-71.
• Chung H, Van der Lippe T. Flexible working, work-life balance, and gender equality: Introduction. Soc Indic Res. 2020;151(2):365-81.
• Rahman MM, Ali NA. Does work-family balance mediate the relationship between work-family conflicts and job satisfaction of academicians?. J Community Psychol. 2021;49(2):361-74.
• Carlson DS, Grzywacz J, Zivnuska S. Work-family balance: Is balance more than conflict and enrichment?. Hum Relat. 2009;20:1-28.
• Greenhaus JH, Collins KM, Shaw JD. The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behaviors. 2003; 63:510-31.
• Gragnano A, Simbula S, Miglioretti, M. Work-life balance: weighing the importance of work–family and work–health balance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):907.
• Greenhaus JH, Ziegert JC, Allen TD. When family supportive supervision matters: Relations between multiple sources of support and work-family balance. Journal of Vocational Behaviors. 2012;80(2):266-75.
• Wattoo MA, Zhao S, Xi M. High‐performance work systems and work–family interface: job autonomy and self‐efficacy as mediators. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 2020;58(1):128-48.
• Talukder AMH. Supervisor support and organizational commitment: The role of work-family conflict, job satisfaction, and work-life balance. J Employ Couns. 2019;56(3):98-116.
• Katou A. Examining the mediating role of work-family balance in the core self-evaluations–organizational performance relationship: a multilevel study. Employee Relations. 2022;44(1):136-55.
• Rahman MM, Ali NA, Jantan AH, Dato'Mansor Z, Rahaman MS. Work to family, family to work conflicts and work family balance as predictors of job satisfaction of Malaysian academic community. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy. 2020;14(4):621-42.
• Žnidaršič J, Bernik M. Impact of work-family balance results on employee work engagement within the organization: The case of Slovenia. PLos One. 2021;16(1):e0245078.
• Gragnano A, Simbula S, Miglioretti M. Work-life balance: Weighing the importance of work-family and work-health balance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):907.
• Grzywacz JG, Butler AB, Almeida DM. Work, family, and health: Work-family balance as a protective factor against stresses of daily life. Marcus-Newhall A, Halpern, DF, Tan SJ, editors, The changing realities of work and family: A multidisciplinary approach. Wiley Blackwell; 2018.
• Medina-Garrido JA, Biedma-Ferrer JM, Ramos-Rodríguez AR. Relationship between work-family balance, employee well-being and job performance. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración. 2017;30(1):40-58.
• Jiménez-Figueroa A, Gómez-Urrutia V. Incidence of subjective well-being and work-family balance in terms of work-family culture in workers of the Chilean judicial branch. Revista Costarricense de Psicología. 2021;40(1):23-36.
• Nordenmark M, Almén N, Vinberg S. Work/family conflict of more importance than psychosocial working conditions and family conditions for mental wellbeing. Societies. 2020;10(3):67.
• Presti AL, Molino M, Emanuel F, Landolfi A, Ghislieri C. Work-family organizational support as a predictor of work-family conflict, enrichment, and balance: Crossover and spillover effects in dual-income couples. Eur J Psychol. 2020;16(1):62-81.
• Verhoef NC, De Ruiter M, Blomme RJ, Curfs EC. Relationship between generic and occupation-specific job demands and resources, negative work-home interference and burnout among GPs. Journal of Management & Organization. 2021;1-29.
• Phelan A, Katz R, Gostin LO. The novel coronavirus originating in Wuhan, China: Challenges for global health governance. JAMA.2020;323(8):709-10.
• Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet.2020;395:470-3.
• WHO Archived: WHO Timeline COVID-19. [Internet]. 2021 [Erişim Tarihi 10 Ağustos 2021]. Erişim Adresi: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-04-2020-who-timeline-covid-19
• Guyot K, Sawhill I. Telecommuting will likely continue long after the pandemic. Brookings. [Internet]. 2021 [Erişim Tarihi 10 Ağustos 2021]. Erişim Adresi: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2020/04/06/telecommuting-will-likely-continue-long-after-the-pandemic/
• Bueno C. Teletrabajo y Salud Mental: Avances y Desafíos Más Allá de la Pandemia. [Internet]. 2021 [Erişim Tarihi 08 Ağustos 2021]. Erişim Adresi:https://www.ilo.org/santiago/publicaciones/reflexionestrabajo/WCMS_757609/lang--es/index.htm
• Tresierr CEV, Pozo ACL. Fatigue and mental workload among workers: About social distancing. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020;94:202010112.
• Palumbo R. Let me go to the office! An investigation into the side effects of working from home on work-life balance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;33:771-90.
• Thulin E, Vilhelmson B, Johansson M. New telework, time pressure, and time use control in everyday life. Sustainability.2019;11:3067.
• Ghasemi F, Zarei M, Heidarimoghadam R, Hosseini SM. Exploring unprecedented problems of academicians during the COVID 19 pandemic and their relationships with fatigue and mental health. Gene Reports. 2021;23:101098.
• Yilmaz Ince E, Kabul A, Diler I. The opinions of academicians on distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sahin M. Shelley, editors, Educational practices during the COVID-19 viral outbreak: International perspectives; ISTES Organization, 2021.
• Karakuzu M, Canlı Z, Canlı B. Effects of lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic on Turkish academicians’ academic writing productivity performance in ELT. Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching. 2020;5(3):179-94.
• Bulińska-Stangrecka H, Bagieńska A, Iddagoda A. Work-life balance during covid-19 pandemic and remote work: A systematic literature review. Emerging trends and strategies for industry 4.0: during and beyond COVID-19, 2021;59.
• Fisher J, Languilaire JC, Lawthom R, Nieuwenhuis R, Petts RJ, Runswick-Cole K, et al. Community, work, and family in times of COVID-19. Community, Work & Family. 2020;23(3):247-52.
• Schieman S, Badawy PJA, Milkie M, Bierman A. Work-life conflict during the COVID-19 pandemic. Socius. 2021;7:1-19.
• Sharma I, Khurape A. How academicians’ journey mapping can bolster their transition from Pre-COVID–Post COVID?. Test Engineering and Management. 2020;83:3385-93.
• Ekinci H, Sabancı A. İş-Yaşam Dengesi Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi.2021;11(1):151-63.
• Landolfi A, Presti AL. A psychometric examination of the work-family balance scale. A multi-sample study on Italian workers. Current Psychology. 2020 (41):1-10:
• Anthoine E, Moret L, Regnault A, Sébille V, Hardouin JB. Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):1-10.
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine.2000;25(24):3186-91.
• Shrotryia VK, Dhanda U. Content validity of assessment instrument for employee engagement. SAGE Open. 2019; 9(1): 2158244018821751.
• Black B, De Carvalho AG, Khanna V, Kim W, Yurtoğlu B. Corporate governance indices and construct validity. Corporate Governance: An International Review.2017;25(6):397-410.
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2001.
• Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1966;1:245.
• Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. RINAH. 2006;29(5):489-97.
• Gu Y, Wang R. Job demands and work-family conflict in preschool teachers: The buffering effects of job resources and of job recovery experiences. Current Psychology Advance Online Publication.2019; 40:3974-85.
• Bellmann L, Hübler O. Working from home, job satisfaction and work–life balance–robust or heterogeneous links?. Int J Manpow. 2021;42(3):424-41.
• White JM. Work-family stage and satisfaction with work-family balance. J Comp Fam Stud. 1999;30:163-75.
• Krisor SM, Diebig M, Rowold J. Is cortisol as a biomarker of stress influenced by the interplay of work-family conflict, work-family balance, and resilience?. Personnel Review. 2015; 44(4):648-61.
• Omran SKA. Work-family balance dilemma among employed parents (An empirical study). International Journal of Business and Economic Development. 2016;4(1):31-46.
• Weinzimmer LG, Baumann HM, Gullifor DP, Koubova V. Emotional intelligence and job performance: The mediating role of work-family balance. J Soc Psychol. 2017;157(3):322-37.
• Fan P. Person-organization fit, work-family balance, and work attitude: The moderated mediating effect of supervisor support. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 2018;46(6):995-1010.
• Büyüköztürk Ş. Factor analysis: Basic concepts and using to development scale. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice. 2002;32:470-83.
• Yaşlıoğlu M. Factor analysis and validity in social sciences: Application of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 2017;46(Special Issue):74-85.
• Collier JE. Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. Routledge; 2020.
• Wang M, Kwan HK, Zhou A. Effects of servant leadership on work-family balance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 2017;55(4):387-407.
• Ercan İ, Kan İ. Ölçeklerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2004;30(3):211-6.
• Karasar N. Ölçme ve araçlarında aranan nitelikler. bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. 19. Baskı. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım; 2009. s. 147-53.