Ameliyat Kaynaklı Basınç Yaralanmalarını Önlemede Etkili Kanıt Temelli Girişimler

Year 2021, , 85 - 92, 31.03.2021

Didem Kandemir Serpil Yüksel

https://doi.org/10.31125/hunhemsire.907916

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Cerrahi girişim geçiren hastalar, basınç yaralanmaları açısından yüksek risk altındadır. Özellikle uzun süren cerrahi girişimler sırasında basıncın etkisiyle dokuda oluşan değişim, ameliyat sonrası 3-7. günlerde ciddi basınç yaralanmaları ile sonuçlanabilmektedir. Bu derlemede, ameliyat kaynaklı basınç yaralanmalarını önlemede etkili kanıt temelli girişimleri literatür ışığında tartışmak amaçlandı. Derlemede, elektronik veri tabanları taranarak elde edilen, 2006-2020 yılları arasında yayınlanmış, tam metnine ulaşılabilen, ameliyat kaynaklı basınç yaralanmaları ile ilgili çalışma ve rehberler incelendi. Ameliyat sırasında basınç yaralanması oluşma sıklığı %1.3-51 arasında değişmekte olup, tüm hastane kaynaklı basınç yaralanmalarının %45’ini oluşturmaktadır. Ameliyat kaynaklı basınç yaralanmalarını önlemede etkili kanıt temelli girişimler; risk değerlendirmesi, pozisyon verme, koruyucu örtü ve destek yüzey kullanımı başlıkları altında ele alınmıştır. Bu yaralanmaları önlemek amacıyla öncelikle uzun ameliyat süresi, hipotermi ve hipotansif ataklar gibi basınç yaralanması riskini artıran faktörler belirlenmelidir. Ameliyat masasında, basıncı dağıtan destek yüzeyler kullanılmalıdır. Ameliyat sırasında hastaya basınç yaralanması riskini azaltacak şekilde pozisyon verilmeli ve topuklar elevasyona alınmalıdır. Gerekirse, topuk süspansiyon cihazları kullanılmalıdır. Ameliyat sonrası dönemde mutlaka ameliyat sırasında verilen pozisyondan farklı bir pozisyon verilmelidir. Sonuç olarak, ameliyat kaynaklı basınç yaralanmalarını önlemede, bireysel ve cerrahi girişim ilişkili risk faktörlerinin dikkatle değerlendirilmesi ve önleme girişimlerinin bu faktörler ve kanıt temelli girişimler dikkate alınarak planlanması önemlidir.

Keywords

Ameliyathane, ameliyat sırası, basınç yaralanması, kanıta dayalı uygulamalar, önleme

Effective Evidence-Based Practices in Preventing Intraoperatively Acquired Pressure Ulcers

Abstract

Patients undergoing surgery are at high risk for pressure injuries. Especially during long-term surgical interventions, the change in tissue caused by pressure may result in serious pressure injuries in the 3-7. days after surgery. In this review, it was aimed to discuss evidence-based interventions that are effective in preventing intraoperatively acquired pressure in the light of the literature. In the review, studies and guides on intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers, which were obtained by scanning electronic databases, published between 2006-2020, and whose full text was available, were examined. The incidence of intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers varies between 1.3-51%, and this ratio constitutes 45% of all hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. Effective evidence-based interventions in preventing intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers were discussed under the titles of risk assessment, positioning, use of prophylactic dressing, and support surface. In order to prevent these injuries, factors that increase the risk of pressure injuries such as long operation time, hypothermia, and hypotensive attacks should be determined. On the operating table, pressure redistributing mattresses should be used. During the operation, the patient should be positioned in a way that reduces the risk of pressure injury, and the heels should be elevated. If necessary, heel suspension devices should be used. In the postoperative period, a different position should be given from the position given during the operation. In conclusion, in preventing surgical pressure injuries, it is important to carefully evaluate individual and surgical intervention-related risk factors and plan prevention interventions by considering these factors and evidence-based interventions.

Keywords

Evidence-based practice, intraoperative, operating room, pressure injury, prevention

References

• 1. Shoemake S, Stoessel K. Pressure ulcers in the surgical patient an independent study guide [Internet]. 2007 [Erişim Tarihi 5 Ağustos 2020]. Erişim adresi: https://es.halyardhealth.com/media/1513/h0277-0701_ci_pressure_ulcer.pdf
• 2. Black J, Clark M, Dealey C, Brindle CT, Alves P, Santamaria N, et al. Dressings as an adjunct to pressure ulcer prevention: Consensus panel recommendations. Int Wound J. 2015;12(4):484-8.
• 3. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP), Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA). Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: Quick reference guide. [Internet]. 2014 [Erişim Tarihi 5 Ağustos 2020]. Erişim adresi: http://www.epuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Quick-Reference-Guide-DIGITAL-NPUAP-EPUAP-PPPIA-16Oct2014.pdf
• 4. Edsberg LE, Black JM, Goldberg M, McNichol L, Moore L, Sieggreen M. Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel pressure injury staging system: Revised pressure injury staging system. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016;43(6):585-97.
• 5. Yoshimura M, Ohura N, Santamaria N, Watanabe Y, Akizuki T, Gefen A. High body mass index is a strong predictor of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in spinal surgery patients when prophylactic film dressings are applied: A retrospective analysis prior to the BOSS trial. Int Wound J. 2020;17(3):660-9.
• 6. Webster J, Lister C, Corry J, Holland M, Coleman K, Marquart L. Incidence and risk factors for surgically acquired pressure ulcers. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2015;42(2):138-44.
• 7. Primiano M, Friend M, McClure C, Nardi S, Fix L, Schafer M, et al. Pressure ulcer prevalence and risk factors during prolonged surgical procedures. AORN J. 2011;94(6):555-66.
• 8. Karadag M, Gümüskaya N. The incidence of pressure ulcers in surgical patients: A sample hospital in Turkey. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15(4):413-21.
• 9. Bulfone G, Marzoli I, Quattrin R, Fabbro C, Palese A. A longitudinal study of the incidence of pressure sores and the associated risks and strategies adopted in Italian operating theatres. J Preoper Pract. 2012;22(2):50-6.
• 10. Engels D, Austin M, McNichol L, Fencl J, Gupta S, Kazi H. Pressure ulcers: Factors contributing to their development in the OR. AORN J. 2016;103(3):271-81.
• 11. Kim JM, Lee H, Ha T, Na S. Perioperative factors associated with pressure ulcer development after major surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71(1):48-56.
• 12. Chen Y, He L, Qu W, Zhang C. Predictors of intraoperative pressure injury in patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017;44(5):445-9.
• 13. Lin S, Hey HWD, Lau ETC, Tan KA, Thambiah JS, Lau LL, et al. Prevalence and predictors of pressure injuries from spine surgery in the prone position. Spine. 2017;42(22):1730-6.
• 14. Riemenschneider KJ. Prevention of pressure injuries in the operating room. J Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurs. 2018;45(2):141-5.
• 15. Chen HL, Chen XY, Wu J. The incidence of pressure ulcers in surgical patients of the last 5 years: A systematic review. Wounds. 2012;24(9):234-41.
• 16. Celik B, Karayurt Ö, Ogce F. The effect of selected risk factors on perioperative pressure injury development. AORN J. 2019;110(1):29-38.
• 17. Minnesota Hospital Association. Pressure ulcer prevention in the OR recommendations and guidance. [Internet]. 2013 [Erişim Tarihi 5 Ağustos 2020]. Erişim adresi: https://www.mnhospitals.org/Portals/0/Documents/ptsafety/skin/OR-pressure-ulcer-recommendations.pdf
• 18. Guo Y, Zhao K, Zhao T, Li Y, Yu Y, Kuang W. The effectiveness of curvilinear supine position on the incidence of pressure injuries and interface pressure among surgical patients. J Tissue Viability. 2019;28(2):81-6.
• 19. Lumbley JL, Ali SA, Tchokouani LS. Retrospective review of predisposing factors for intraoperative pressure ulcer development. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26(5):368-74.
• 20. Burlingame BL. Guideline implementation: Positioning the patient. AORN J. 2017;106(3):227-37.
• 21. Kitamura A, Yoshimura M, Nakagami G, Yabunaka K, Sanada H. Changes of tissue images visualized by ultrasonography in the process of pressure ulcer occurrence. J Wound Care. 2019;28(4):S18-22.
• 22. Gould L, Stuntz M, Giovannelli M, Ahmad A, Aslam R, Mullen-Fortino M, et al. Wound Healing Society 2015 update on guidelines for pressure ulcers. Wound Rep Reg. 2016;24(1):145-62.
• 23. Goodwin CR, Recinos PF, Omeis I, Momin EN, Witham TF, Bydon A, et al. Prevention of facial pressure ulcers using the Mayfield clamp for sacral tumor resection. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(1):85-7.
• 24. O’Brien DD, Shanks AM, Talsma A, Brenner PS, Ramachandran SK. Intraoperative risk factors associated with postoperative pressure ulcers in critically ill patients: A retrospective observational study. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(1):40-7.
• 25. Aloweni F, Ang SY, Fook Chong S, Agus N, Yong P, Goh MM, et al. A prediction tool for hospital‐acquired pressure ulcers among surgical patients: Surgical pressure ulcer risk score. Int Wound J. 2019;16(1):164-75.
• 26. Haisley M, Sørensen JA, Sollie M. Postoperative pressure injuries in adults having surgery under general anaesthesia: Systematic review of perioperative risk factors. Brit J Surg. 2020;107(4):338-47.
• 27. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP), National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA). Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: Quick reference guide. [Internet]. 2019 [Erişim Tarihi 5 Ağustos 2020]. Erişim adresi: https://www.epuap.org/download/11182/
• 28. Tschannen D, Talsma A, Guo Y. Patient specific and surgical characteristics in the development of pressure ulcers. Am J Crit Care. 2012;21(2):116-25.
• 29. Tschannen D, Anderson C. The pressure injury predictive model: A framework for hospital acquired pressure injuries. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(7-8):1398-421.
• 30. Gao L, Yang L, Li X, Chen J, Du J, Bai X, Yang X. The use of a logistic regression model to develop a risk assessment of intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcer. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(15-16):2984-92.
• 31. Xiong C, Gao X, Ma Q, Yang Y, Wang Z, Yu W, et al. Risk factors for intraoperative pressure injuries in patients undergoing digestive surgery: A retrospective study. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(7-8):1148-55.
• 32. Yoshimura M, Nakagami G, Iizaka S, Yoshida M, Uehata Y, Kohno M, et al. Microclimate is an independent risk factor for the development of intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers in the park‐bench position: A prospective observational study. Wound Repair Regen. 2015;23(6):939-47.
• 33. Kirkland-Walsh H, Teleten O, Wilson M, Raingruber B. Pressure mapping comparison of four OR surfaces. AORN J. 2015;102(1):61.e1-61.e9.
• 34. Yoshimura M, Ohura N, Tanaka J, Ichimura S, Kasuya Y, Hotta O, et al. Soft silicone foam dressing is more effective than polyurethane film dressing for preventing intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers in spinal surgery patients: The Border Operating room Spinal Surgery (BOSS) trial in Japan. Int Wound J. 2018;15(2):188-97.
• 35. Robertson J, Stern M, Buelow-Smith L, Birt J, Buchel E, Campbell A, et al. Pressure ulser prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers clinical practices guideline [Internet]. 2012 [Erişim Tarihi 28 Temmuz 2020]. Erişim adresi: http://www.wrha.mb.ca/extranet/eipt/files/EIPT-013-004.pdf
• 36. Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN). Guideline summary: Positioning the patient. AORN J. 2017;106(3):238-47.
• 37. Malkoun M, Huber J, Huber D. A comparative assessment of interface pressures generated by four surgical theatre heel pressure ulcer prophylactics. Int Wound J. 2012;9(3):259-63.
• 38. Haleem S, Mihai R, Rothenfluh DA, Reynolds J. Preventing iatrogenic facial pressure ulcers during spinal surgery: Prospective trial using a novel method and review of literature. Int Wound J. 2020; 1-5.
• 39. Feuchtinger J, de Bie R, Dassen T, Halfens R. A 4‐cm thermoactive viscoelastic foam pad on the operating room table to prevent pressure ulcer during cardiac surgery. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15(2):162-7.
• 40. Ezeamuzie O, Darian V, Katiyar U, Siddiqui A. Intraoperative use of low-profile alternating pressure mattress for prevention of hospital acquired pressure injury. Perioper Care Oper Room Manag. 2019;17:100080.
• 41. Joseph J, McLaughlin D, Darian V, Hayes L, Siddiqui A. Alternating pressure overlay for prevention of intraoperative pressure injury. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019;46(1):13-7.
• 42. Gao XL, Hu JJ, Ma Q, Wu HY, Wang ZY, Li TT, et. al. Design and research on reliability-validity for 3S Intraoperative Risk Assessment Scale of Pressure Sore. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2015;35(2):291-4.
• 43. Munro CA. The development of a pressure ulcer risk-assessment scale for perioperative patients. AORN J. 2010;92(3):272-87.
• 44. Lopes CMDM, Haas VJ, Dantas RAS, Oliveira CGD, Galvão CM. Assessment scale of risk for surgical positioning injuries. Rev Lat-Am Enferm. 2016;24:e2704.
• 45. Peixoto CDA, Ferreira MBG, Felix MMDS, Pires PDS, Barichello E, Barbosa MH. Risk assessment for perioperative pressure injuries. Rev Lat-Am Enferm. 2019;27:e2e3117.
• 46. Soyer Ö, Özbayır T. 3S Ameliyathane Basınç Yarası Risk Tanılama Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Uluslararası Hakemli Hemşirelik Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2018;13:46-64.