Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Yeni Kamu Yönetiminin Kamu Kurumlarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Birleşik Krallık Yerel Yönetimlerinde Zorunlu Rekabetçi Sunum

Year 2001, Volume: 19 Issue: 1, 105 - 122, 01.07.2001

Abstract


 



Yeni Kamu Yönetimi
(YKM) bir yönetim teknikleri seti olarak görülebilir. Yeni kamu hizmetleri
dağıtım sistemi, idare tarafından uygulamadaki parçalanmanın önlenmesi için
kullanılmıştır. YKM bir kamu örgütünün yapısını, sistemini, personelini ve
kültürünü değiştirmeye çalışmaktadır. Bundan dolayı, YKM uygulamaya sokulurken
aynı zamanda bir kamu örgütü yukarıdaki dört konu açısından incelenmelidir. Bu
çalışmada YKM tartışması, Birleşik Krallık yerel yönetimleri tarafından
uygulanmaya başlayan zorunlu rekabetçi hizmet sunumu ile aydınlatılmaya
çalışılmıştır. Bu çalışma ortaya koymaktadır ki, zorunlu rekabetçi hizmet
sunumu, yerel yönetimler üzerinde geleneksel yerel yönetim otoritesi yerine
yenisinin geçmesi esnasında derin etkiler bırakmıştır ve yerel yönetimlerde çok
karmaşık değişiklikleri beraberinde getirmiştir.



 

References

  • AUCOIN, Peter (1990) “Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums,” Governance, 3 (2), 115-137.
  • BORINS, Sandford (1995) “The New Public Management is Here to Stay,” Canadian Public Administration, 38 (1), 122-132.
  • CHANDLER, Jim (1996) “New Public Management: Does it Exist?” J. Stanyer&Hampsher-Monk ed., Contemporary Public Studies, Political Studies Association, Belfast.
  • COCHRANE, Allan (1993) “Local Government,” Richard Maidment & Graheme Thompson ed., Managing The United Kingdom, Sage Publication, London, Ch. 10.
  • DUNLEAVY, Patrick, HOOD, Christopher (1994) “From Old Public Administration to New Public Management,” Public Money & Management, 14 (July- September), 9-16.
  • ELCOCK, Howard (1994) Local Government: Policy and Management in Local Authorities, Routledge, London.
  • EVANS, Mark (1996) Public Organisation Theory; A Department of Politics Module Guide, University of York. FENWICK, J., SHAW, K., A. FOREMAN. (1994) “Managing Competition in UK Local Government,” International Journal of Public Sector Management, 7(6), 4-14.
  • FLYNN, Norman (1990) “The Impact of Compulsory Competition on Public Sector Management: Competition within the Field,” Public Policy and Administration, 5 (1), 33-43.
  • FLYNN, Norman, STREHL, eds. (1996) Public Sector Management in Europe, Prentice Hall, London. GRAND, Julian Le, BARTLETT, Will (1993) Quasi-Market and Social Policy, The Macmillan Press Ltd, London.
  • HOOD, Christopher (1990a) “De-Sir Humphreyfying the Westminster Model of Bureaucracy: A New Style of Governance?” Governance, 3 (2), 205-214.
  • HOOD, Christopher (1990b) “Public Administration: Lost An Empire, Not Yet Found A Role?”, Adrian Leftwich ed., New Development in Political Science, Aldershot, Edward Elgar.
  • HOOD, Christopher (1991) “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration, 69 (Spring), 3-19.
  • HOOD, Christopher (1995) “The New Public Management in the 1980s Variations on a Theme,” Accounting, Organisation and Society, 20 (2/3), 93-109.
  • HOOD, C., JACKSON, M. (1991) Administrative Argument, Dartmouth Publish Comp. Ltd., Aldershot, England.
  • HUGHES, Owen E. (1994) Public Management & Administration, The Macmillian Press Ltd., London.
  • ISAAC-HENRY, K., C. PAINTER, C. BARNES, (1993) Management in the Public Sector: Challenge and Change, Chapman & Hall, London
  • KANE, Michael (1996) “The Nature of Competition in British Local Government,” Public Policy and Administration, 11 (3), 51-66.
  • LAWTON, A., A. G. ROSE. (1991) Organisation & Management in the Public Sector, Pitman Publishing, London.
  • PARKER, David (1990) “The 1988 Local Government Act and Compulsory Competitive Tendering,” Urban Studies, 27 (5), 653-668.
  • POLLIT, Christopher (1990) Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo- American Experience, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • RHODES, R. A. W. (1991) “Theory and Methods in British Public Administration,” Political Studies, 39 (3).
  • RHODES, R. A. W. (1994) “The Hollowing Out of the State: The Changing Nature of the Public Service in Britain,” The Political Quarterly, 138-151.
  • SHAW, K., FENWICK, J., A. FOREMAN. (1994) “Compulsory Competitive Tendering for Local Government Services: The Experiences of Local Authorities in the North of England 1988-1992,” Public Administration, 72, 201-217.
  • SHAW, K., FENWICK, J., A. FOREMAN. (1995) “Compulsory Competition for Local Government Services in the UK: A Case of Market Rhetoric and Camouflaged Centralism,” Public Policy and Administration, 10 (1), 63-75.
  • WALSH, Kieron, Howard DAVIS (1993) Competition and Service: The Impact of the Local Government Act 1988, HMSO, London.
  • WALSH, Kieron (1995a) Public Services and Market Mechanism, Macmillan Press Ltd., Hampshire, London.
  • WALSH, Kieron (1995b) “Competition and Public Service Delivery,” John Stuart and Gerry Stoker ed. Local Government in the 1990s, The Macmillan Press Ltd., London.
  • WILSON, David, Chris GAME (1994) Local Government in the United Kingdom, The Macmillan Press Ltd., London

ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT ON PUBLIC ORGANISATIONS: COMPULSORY COMPETITIVE TENDERING IN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

Year 2001, Volume: 19 Issue: 1, 105 - 122, 01.07.2001

Abstract

The New
Public Management (NPM) may be seen as a set of managerial techniques used by
administration for the prevention of fragmentation during the adoption of new
public service delivery system. NPM attempts to change the structure, system,
staff and culture of a public organisation. Therefore, when NPM is introduced,
it should be examined from the context of these four aspects of public
organisation. This discussion of NPM will be illuminated through a case study
of the introduction of compulsory competitive tendering (CCT) in local
governments in the United Kingdom. It concludes that CCT has had a profound
impact on local government in attempting to replace the traditional model of
local authority. It has brought a number of substantial changes to local
governments.

References

  • AUCOIN, Peter (1990) “Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums,” Governance, 3 (2), 115-137.
  • BORINS, Sandford (1995) “The New Public Management is Here to Stay,” Canadian Public Administration, 38 (1), 122-132.
  • CHANDLER, Jim (1996) “New Public Management: Does it Exist?” J. Stanyer&Hampsher-Monk ed., Contemporary Public Studies, Political Studies Association, Belfast.
  • COCHRANE, Allan (1993) “Local Government,” Richard Maidment & Graheme Thompson ed., Managing The United Kingdom, Sage Publication, London, Ch. 10.
  • DUNLEAVY, Patrick, HOOD, Christopher (1994) “From Old Public Administration to New Public Management,” Public Money & Management, 14 (July- September), 9-16.
  • ELCOCK, Howard (1994) Local Government: Policy and Management in Local Authorities, Routledge, London.
  • EVANS, Mark (1996) Public Organisation Theory; A Department of Politics Module Guide, University of York. FENWICK, J., SHAW, K., A. FOREMAN. (1994) “Managing Competition in UK Local Government,” International Journal of Public Sector Management, 7(6), 4-14.
  • FLYNN, Norman (1990) “The Impact of Compulsory Competition on Public Sector Management: Competition within the Field,” Public Policy and Administration, 5 (1), 33-43.
  • FLYNN, Norman, STREHL, eds. (1996) Public Sector Management in Europe, Prentice Hall, London. GRAND, Julian Le, BARTLETT, Will (1993) Quasi-Market and Social Policy, The Macmillan Press Ltd, London.
  • HOOD, Christopher (1990a) “De-Sir Humphreyfying the Westminster Model of Bureaucracy: A New Style of Governance?” Governance, 3 (2), 205-214.
  • HOOD, Christopher (1990b) “Public Administration: Lost An Empire, Not Yet Found A Role?”, Adrian Leftwich ed., New Development in Political Science, Aldershot, Edward Elgar.
  • HOOD, Christopher (1991) “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration, 69 (Spring), 3-19.
  • HOOD, Christopher (1995) “The New Public Management in the 1980s Variations on a Theme,” Accounting, Organisation and Society, 20 (2/3), 93-109.
  • HOOD, C., JACKSON, M. (1991) Administrative Argument, Dartmouth Publish Comp. Ltd., Aldershot, England.
  • HUGHES, Owen E. (1994) Public Management & Administration, The Macmillian Press Ltd., London.
  • ISAAC-HENRY, K., C. PAINTER, C. BARNES, (1993) Management in the Public Sector: Challenge and Change, Chapman & Hall, London
  • KANE, Michael (1996) “The Nature of Competition in British Local Government,” Public Policy and Administration, 11 (3), 51-66.
  • LAWTON, A., A. G. ROSE. (1991) Organisation & Management in the Public Sector, Pitman Publishing, London.
  • PARKER, David (1990) “The 1988 Local Government Act and Compulsory Competitive Tendering,” Urban Studies, 27 (5), 653-668.
  • POLLIT, Christopher (1990) Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo- American Experience, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • RHODES, R. A. W. (1991) “Theory and Methods in British Public Administration,” Political Studies, 39 (3).
  • RHODES, R. A. W. (1994) “The Hollowing Out of the State: The Changing Nature of the Public Service in Britain,” The Political Quarterly, 138-151.
  • SHAW, K., FENWICK, J., A. FOREMAN. (1994) “Compulsory Competitive Tendering for Local Government Services: The Experiences of Local Authorities in the North of England 1988-1992,” Public Administration, 72, 201-217.
  • SHAW, K., FENWICK, J., A. FOREMAN. (1995) “Compulsory Competition for Local Government Services in the UK: A Case of Market Rhetoric and Camouflaged Centralism,” Public Policy and Administration, 10 (1), 63-75.
  • WALSH, Kieron, Howard DAVIS (1993) Competition and Service: The Impact of the Local Government Act 1988, HMSO, London.
  • WALSH, Kieron (1995a) Public Services and Market Mechanism, Macmillan Press Ltd., Hampshire, London.
  • WALSH, Kieron (1995b) “Competition and Public Service Delivery,” John Stuart and Gerry Stoker ed. Local Government in the 1990s, The Macmillan Press Ltd., London.
  • WILSON, David, Chris GAME (1994) Local Government in the United Kingdom, The Macmillan Press Ltd., London
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Şennur Sezgin This is me

Selami Sezgin This is me

Publication Date July 1, 2001
Submission Date June 5, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2001 Volume: 19 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Sezgin, Ş., & Sezgin, S. (2001). Yeni Kamu Yönetiminin Kamu Kurumlarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Birleşik Krallık Yerel Yönetimlerinde Zorunlu Rekabetçi Sunum. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 105-122.
AMA Sezgin Ş, Sezgin S. Yeni Kamu Yönetiminin Kamu Kurumlarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Birleşik Krallık Yerel Yönetimlerinde Zorunlu Rekabetçi Sunum. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. July 2001;19(1):105-122.
Chicago Sezgin, Şennur, and Selami Sezgin. “Yeni Kamu Yönetiminin Kamu Kurumlarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Birleşik Krallık Yerel Yönetimlerinde Zorunlu Rekabetçi Sunum”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 19, no. 1 (July 2001): 105-22.
EndNote Sezgin Ş, Sezgin S (July 1, 2001) Yeni Kamu Yönetiminin Kamu Kurumlarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Birleşik Krallık Yerel Yönetimlerinde Zorunlu Rekabetçi Sunum. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 19 1 105–122.
IEEE Ş. Sezgin and S. Sezgin, “Yeni Kamu Yönetiminin Kamu Kurumlarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Birleşik Krallık Yerel Yönetimlerinde Zorunlu Rekabetçi Sunum”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 105–122, 2001.
ISNAD Sezgin, Şennur - Sezgin, Selami. “Yeni Kamu Yönetiminin Kamu Kurumlarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Birleşik Krallık Yerel Yönetimlerinde Zorunlu Rekabetçi Sunum”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 19/1 (July 2001), 105-122.
JAMA Sezgin Ş, Sezgin S. Yeni Kamu Yönetiminin Kamu Kurumlarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Birleşik Krallık Yerel Yönetimlerinde Zorunlu Rekabetçi Sunum. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2001;19:105–122.
MLA Sezgin, Şennur and Selami Sezgin. “Yeni Kamu Yönetiminin Kamu Kurumlarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Birleşik Krallık Yerel Yönetimlerinde Zorunlu Rekabetçi Sunum”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 1, 2001, pp. 105-22.
Vancouver Sezgin Ş, Sezgin S. Yeni Kamu Yönetiminin Kamu Kurumlarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Birleşik Krallık Yerel Yönetimlerinde Zorunlu Rekabetçi Sunum. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2001;19(1):105-22.

Manuscripts must conform to the requirements indicated on the last page of the Journal - Guide for Authors- and in the web page.


Privacy Statement

Names and e-mail addresses in this Journal Web page will only be used for the specified purposes of the Journal; they will not be opened for any other purpose or use by any other person.