Emergency General Surgery Experience Of A Tertiary Center
Abstract
Background: We aimed to present the emergency General Surgery patient profile and results of our hospital.
Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital Clinic between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2019. Patients who were admitted to the emergency department and underwent emergency operations at the General Surgery clinic were included in the study. Gender, age, anamnesis, laboratory tests, radiological findings, preoperative diagnoses, surgery notes, and postoperative results of the patients were recorded.
Results: A total number of 2820 cases including 1201 (42.6%) female, and 1619 (57.4%) male patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 37.32 years (min: 14, max: 94). The most common age range was between the ages of 21-30 years.
Most of the emergency surgeries were performed due to nontraumatic indications in 2645 (93.8%) , and 1790 of them (67.67%) were cases of appendicitis. Other indications of nontrau-matic emergency surgeries were abscess, incarcerated hernia, ileus, and perforation. 175 (6.2%) patients who came to our general surgery emergency department were operated on due to trauma. The most common causes of trauma in these patients were sharp force and stab in-juries in 43.4% and gunshot wounds in 39.4% of the cases.
Conclusions: The frequency and distribution of emergency cases vary according to the locations of the hospitals. Epidemiological studies and increasing data on emergency surgery enable the determination of the emergency surgery profile of the regions and the preparation of the hos-pital staff for the patients who will seek medical help.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
References
- 1. Aydın O. Acil servisten genel cerrahiye konsülte edilen olguları tanısal analizi. KÜ Tıp Fak Derg 2014;16(3):1-3.
- 2. Jawaid M, Raza SM, Alam SN, Manzar S. On-call emergency work load of a general surgical team. Journal of Emergencies. Trauma and Shock 2009;2(1):10-5.
- 3. Turan M, Şen M, Koyuncu A, Aydın C, Karadayı K, Canbay E. Yeni gelişmeler ışığında akut karın. C.Ü. Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2002;24(1):45-52.
- 4. Grundmann RT, Petersen M, Lippert H, Meyer F. Theacute (surgical) abdomen-epidemiology, diagnosis and general principles of management. Z Gastroenterol 2010;48(6):696-706.
- 5. Hatipoğlu RA, Karagülle E, Karakaya K, Gökçe SF, Abcı I. Dokuz yıllık travma olgularımız. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2001;7(2):91-5.
- 6. Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V. Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1391-6.
- 7. Lameris W, Randen A, Dijkdraaf M, Bossuyt P, Stoker J, Boermeester M. Optimization of diagnostic imaging use in patients with acute abdominal pain (OPTIMA): Design and raionale. BMC Emergency Medicine 2007;7:9.
- 8. Saleh MA, Troy S, Etienne T. What Clinical and Laboratory Parameters Determine Significant intra-abdominal Pathology for Patients Assessed in Hospital with Acute Abdominal Pain? World J Emerg Surg. 2007;2:26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Clinical Sciences
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
April 28, 2022
Submission Date
February 3, 2022
Acceptance Date
March 7, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 19 Number: 1