Research Article

Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Materials in A Tertiary Hospital

Volume: 22 Number: 1 March 26, 2025
EN TR

Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Materials in A Tertiary Hospital

Abstract

Introduction: Hysterectomy, a frequently used surgical procedure in gynecology, entails the removal of a part or all of the uterus and is employed in treating various benign and malignant diseases. This study aims to evaluate the histopathological analyses of patients underwent hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the histopathological analysis results of hysterectomy materials and compare them with clinical diagnoses. Methods: The clinical and histopathological data of 107 patients who underwent hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital between January and March 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients' age, hysterectomy type, indication, histopathological diagnosis, and other clinical parameters were recorded. Results: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) was the most preferred type of hysterectomy (n=62, %57.94) and patients’ age average was 49.83. Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and myoma uteri was the most prevalent reasons of hysterectomy (n=47, %47.66). While Leiomyoma was the most frequent diagnosis in myometrial lesions (n=52, %47.27), endometrial polyp stood out as the most frequent finding among endometrial lesions. (n=34, %31.77). Conclusion: This study revealed that the histopathological analysis results of hysterectomy materials were largely consistent with clinical diagnoses. AUB and myoma uteri were among the leading indications for hysterectomy. Endometrial polyp stood out as the most common diagnosis among endometrial lesions, whereas leiomyoma emerged as the predominant diagnosis among myometrial lesions.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterec-tomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1091-5.
  2. 2. Sarfraz T, Tariq H. Histopathological findings in menorrhagia: A study of 100 hysterectomy specimens. Pak J Pathol. 2005;16:83-5.
  3. 3. Shahid R, Abbas H, Mumtaz S, Perveen F, Bari MF, Raja T, et al. Hysterectomy and Oophorectomy in Reproductive Age: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital. Cureus. 2020;12(5):e8344. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8344.
  4. 4. Balcı O. Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;11(4):224-227. doi:10.4274/tjod.47108.
  5. 5. Ramachandran T, Sinha P, Subramanium. Correlation between clinicopathological and ultrasonographical findings in hysterec-tomy. J Clin Diag Res. 2011; 5:737-40.
  6. 6. Dhuliya V, Gosai D, Jain H, Goswami H. Histopathological study of uterine and cervical lesion in hysterectomy specimen. BJKines-National Journal of Basic & Applied Science. 2016;8:23-6.
  7. 7. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub3. Update in: Cochrane Da-tabase Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD003677.
  8. 8. Committee Opinion No 701: Choosing the Route of Hysterec-tomy for Benign Disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(6):e155-e159. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002112.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Gastroenterology Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

March 11, 2025

Publication Date

March 26, 2025

Submission Date

January 7, 2025

Acceptance Date

February 2, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 22 Number: 1

APA
Tammo, Ö., Çelik, E., Söylemez, E., Filiz, D., & İncebıyık, M. (2025). Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Materials in A Tertiary Hospital. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 50-53. https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.1615331
AMA
1.Tammo Ö, Çelik E, Söylemez E, Filiz D, İncebıyık M. Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Materials in A Tertiary Hospital. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2025;22(1):50-53. doi:10.35440/hutfd.1615331
Chicago
Tammo, Ömer, Enes Çelik, Esra Söylemez, Dilber Filiz, and Mehmet İncebıyık. 2025. “Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Materials in A Tertiary Hospital”. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 22 (1): 50-53. https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.1615331.
EndNote
Tammo Ö, Çelik E, Söylemez E, Filiz D, İncebıyık M (March 1, 2025) Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Materials in A Tertiary Hospital. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 22 1 50–53.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Tammo, E. Çelik, E. Söylemez, D. Filiz, and M. İncebıyık, “Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Materials in A Tertiary Hospital”, Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 50–53, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.35440/hutfd.1615331.
ISNAD
Tammo, Ömer - Çelik, Enes - Söylemez, Esra - Filiz, Dilber - İncebıyık, Mehmet. “Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Materials in A Tertiary Hospital”. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 22/1 (March 1, 2025): 50-53. https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.1615331.
JAMA
1.Tammo Ö, Çelik E, Söylemez E, Filiz D, İncebıyık M. Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Materials in A Tertiary Hospital. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2025;22:50–53.
MLA
Tammo, Ömer, et al. “Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Materials in A Tertiary Hospital”. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 50-53, doi:10.35440/hutfd.1615331.
Vancouver
1.Ömer Tammo, Enes Çelik, Esra Söylemez, Dilber Filiz, Mehmet İncebıyık. Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Materials in A Tertiary Hospital. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2025 Mar. 1;22(1):50-3. doi:10.35440/hutfd.1615331

Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0).