Vazovagal Senkoplu Hastaların Elektrokardiyografi Ve Ekokardiyografilerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Senkop genel popülasyonda oldukça sıkça görülür ve en sık görülen tipi, nöral (reflex) aracılı senkop olarak, tanımlanan vazovagal senkop türüdür. Bu çalışmada vazovagal senkop tanısı alan hastaların ekokardiyografi ve elektrokardiyografilerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır Materyal ve metod: Kardiyoloji polkliniğinde vazovagal senkop tanısı konan 60 hasta ve kardiyak değerlendirme sonucu herhangi bir patoloji saptanmayan, benzer demografik özelliklere sahip ardışık 30 sağlıklı birey, kontrol grubu olarak çalışmaya dâhil edildi. Hastaların ayrıntılı anamnez, öykü ve fizik muayene sonrası elektrokardiyografik (EKG) ve ekokardiyografi değerlendirmeleri yapıldı Sonuçlar: Vazovagal senkoplu hasta grubu ve kontrol grubu arasında yaş, cinsiyet, temel EKG ve ekokardiyografik bulgular açısından anlamlı farklılık izlenmedi (tüm p değerleri >0,05). Bununa beraber senkoplu hasta grubunda, EKG'de kalp hızı anlamlı olarak daha yüksek iken, E/Em oranı ise anlamlı olarak daha düşük saptandı (sırasıyla, 85±8,7 vs 77±6,9, p=0,033 ve 8,6±1,2 vs 9,2±1,1 p=0,020). Tartışma: Senkoplu hastaların EKG ve ekokardiyografik değerlendirmeleri kardiyak patolojilerin tanınmasının yanında, vazovagalsenkoplu hastalarda sol ventikül doluş basınçlarının değerlendirilmesinde ek ilgiler sağlayabilir

Keywords

• Vazovagal Senkop,Elektrokardiyografi,Ekokardiyografi.

The Assessment of Electrocardiography And Echocardiography in Vasovagal Syncope

Abstract

Objective: Syncope is a common clinical problem in the general population. Vasovagal syncope (a type of neural –reflex syncope) is the most common form of syncope. The aim of this was to evaluate the electrocardiography and echocardiographic parameters in patients with vasovagal syncope Material and method: Atotal of 60 consequently patients with vasovagal syncopeand 30 randomly age/sex matched subjects with no cardiovascular or systemic disease were recruited in this study. Afterall study population underwent a detailed history and physical examination, the electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiographic evaluation performed. Results: Vasovagal syncope group and control group were similar in terms ofthe age, sex, basic ECG and echocardiographic parameters (all p values >0.05).However, heart rate on ECG was significantly higher, while E/Em ratio was significantly lower in vasovagal syncope group (85±8,7vs77±6,9, p=0,033 ve 8,6±1,2 vs 9,2±1,1 p=0,020, respectively). Conclusion: In addition to reveal the possible underlying cardiac pathologyin syncope patients, the assessment of ECG and echocardiography can provide a usefulcontributionregardingleft ventricular filling pressure in patients with vasovagal syncope

Keywords

• Vasovagal Syncope,Electrocardiography,Echocardiography

References

1. 1.Angel M, Richard S, Fabrizio A, et al. Guidelines on diagnosis and management of Syncope- Eur Heart J 2009;30:2631-71.
2. 2.Day SC, Cook EF, Funkenstein H, et al. Evaluation and outcome of emergency room patients with transient loss of consciousness. Am J Med 1982;73:15-23.
3. 3.Brignole M, Disertori M, Menozzi C, et al. Management of syncope referred urgently to general hospitals with and without syncope units. Europace 2003;5:293-8.
4. 4.Bartoletti A, Fabiani P, Adriani P, et al. Hospital admission of patients referred to the Emergency Department for syncope: a single-hospital prospective study based on the application of the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on syncope. Eur Heart J 2006;27:83-8
5. 5.Alboni P. The different clinical presentations of vasovagal syncope. Heart. 2015 May;101(9):674-8.
6. 6.Jardine DL. Vasovagal syncope: new physiologic insights. CardiolClin. 2013 Feb;31(1):75-87.
7. 7.Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am SocEchocardiogr. 2015;28:1–39.
8. 8.Strickerger SA, Benson DW, Biaggioni I, Callans DJ, Cohen MI, Ellenbogen KA. AHA/ACCF Scientific statementionThe evaluation of syncope. Circulation 2006;113(2):316- 327

9. 9.Grubb BP. Clinicalpractice. Neurocardiogenicsyncope. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1004–1010
10. 10.Ammirati F, Colaceci R, Cesario A, Strano S, DellaScala A, Colangelo I, De Santo T, Toscano E, Ricci R, S a n t i n i M. Ma n a g eme n t o f s y n c o p e : clinicalandeconomicimpact of a SyncopeUnit. Europace. 2008;10(4):471–476.
11. 11.Douglas PS, Garcia MJ, Haines DE, Lai WW, Manning WJ, Patel AR, Picard MH, Polk DM, Ragosta M , W a r d R P , W e i n e r R B . ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SC CT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, AmericanSociety of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical CareMedicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 1;57(9):1126-66.
12. 12.Chang NL, Shah P, Bajaj S, Virk H, Bikkina M, Shamoon F. Diagnostic Yield of Echocardiography in Syncope Patients with Normal ECG. Cardiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:1251637. doi: 10.1155/2016/1251637. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
13. 13.Sarasin FP, Junod AF, Carballo D, Slama S, Unger PF, Louis-Simonet M. Role of echocardiography in theevaluation of syncope: a prospectivestudy. Heart. 2002 Oct;88(4):363-7.
14. 14.Anderson KL, Limkakeng A, Damuth E, Chandra A. Cardiac evaluation for structura labnormalitiesmay not be required in patients presenting with syncope and a normal ECG result in an observation unit setting. AnnEmergMed. 2012Oct;60(4):478-84.e1.
15. 15.Wieling W, Colman N, Krediet CT, Freeman R (2004) Nonpharmacological treatment of reflex syncope. ClinAutonRes 14(Suppl 1):62–70