İntraabdominal Sepsiste Bogota BagUygulaması

Abstract

Amaç: İntra abdominal enfeksiyonu, özellikle de abdominal hipertansiyon ile birlikte bulunan hastalara nasıl ve ne tür bir ameliyat yapılacağına karar vermek genel cerrahlar için en önemli sorunlardan birisidir. Son zamanlarda abdominal sepsisi ve hipertansiyonu bulunan hastalara karın tansiyonunu azaltmak ve sepsisi kontrol altına almak için prostetik meshler kullanılarak kapama teknikleri popülarite kazanmıştır. Bu çalışmada intraabdominal sepsis nedeniyle tedavi edilen bazı olgularımızda uyguladığımız açık abdomen veya geçici kapama yöntemlerinden biri olan “Bogota Bag” tekniği ile ilgili tecrübelerimizi sunmayı amaçladık. Materyal ve Metod: Selçuk Üniversitesi Meram Tıp Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi Kliniği’nde Mart 2000-Aralık2003 tarihleri arasında karın içi enfeksiyon sekonder peritonit nedeniyle tedavi edilen ve cerrahi tedavisi esnasındaki bir dönemde Bogota Bag uygulanan 7 hastanın dosya bilgileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bulgular: Olguların 4’ü erkek % 57.14 , 3’ü kadındı %42.86 . Ortalama yaş erkeklerde 51.25 , kadınlarda 60.66 idi. Oluşan intraabdominal enfeksiyonun nedeni 3 olguda gastrointestinal perforasyon sonrası gecikmiş yaygın peritonit, 4 olguda ise postoperatif peritonitti. Sonuç: İntraabdominal sepsise neden olan primer peritonitli hastaların karın içi enfeksiyonlarının kontrolünde birçok cerrahi yöntem birlikte ve ardışık olarak kullanılabilir. Bu hastalarda karınları kapatıldığında intraabdominal basınçları yükseleceği gözönüne alınarak geçici kapatma yöntemlerinden biri olan Bogota Bag tekniği iyi bir alternatif olabilir

Keywords

• İntra abdominal sepsis,Bogota bag,Alternatif tedavi

Applıed Of Bogota Bag In Intraabdominal Sepsis

Abstract

Aim: It’s one of the most important problems for general surgeons to decide on what kind of operation should me applied to patients with intraabdominal infection, specially with concomitant abdominal hypertension. Lately, closing techniques by using prosthetic meshes in order to retain abdominal tension and to control sepsis, for patients with abdominal sepsis and hypertension have become very popular. With this studty, we aimed to present our experiences about the technique “Bogota bag” that we used for some of our patients who are treated for intraabdominal sepsis, which is one of the open abdomen or transient closing methods. Material ve Method: File data of 7 patients who had been treated in Selçuk University Meram Medicine Faculty General Surgery Clinics between March 2000- December 2003 for intraabdominal infection secondary peritonitis and for whom the technique Bogota Bag had been used in a period during surgical treatment, were examined retrospectively. Findings: 4 of the cases were male 57.14% and 3 of them were female 42.86% . Mean ages were 51.25 4371 for men and 60.66 for women. The reasons for intraabdominal infection were late disseminated peritonitis after gastrointestinal perforation at 3 cases and postoperative peritonitis for 4 cases. Result: Lots of surgical methods may be used together and consecutively for the control of intraabdominal infections at patients with primary peritonitis causing intraabdominal sepsis. Considering that the intraabdominal pressure will increase when the abdomen is closed, the technique Bogota bag which is a temporary closing method may be a good alternative

Keywords

• Intraabdominal sepsis,Bogota bag,Alternative treatment

References

1. Wittmann DH Staged abdominal repair: development and current practice of an advanced operative technique for suppurative peritonitis. Acta Chir Austriaca 2000; 32:171– 178
2. Wittmann DH, Aprahamian C, Bergstein JM Etappenlavage: advanced diffuse peritonitis managed by planned multiple laparotomies utilizing zippers, slide fasteners, and Velcro analogue for temporary abdominal closure. World J Surg 1990;14:218–226
3. Schein M, Saadia R, Jamieson JR, Decker GA The ’sandwich technique’ in the management of the open abdomen. Br J Surg 1986;73:369–370
4. McLauchlan GJ, Anderson ID, Grant IS, Fearon KCH Outcome of patients with abdominal sepsis treated in the intensive care unit. Br J Surg;1995; 82:524–529
5. Berger D, Buttenschoen K (1998) Management Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 383:35–43
6. Bosscha K, Hulstaert PF, Visser MR, van Vroonhoven TJMV, van der Werken Chr Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations in severe bacterial peritonitis. Eur J Surg 2000; 166:44–49
7. Ridings PC, Bloomfeld GL, Blocher CR et al. Cardiopulmonaly effects of raised intra- abdominal
8. intravascular volume expansion. J Trauma 1995; 39, 1071–1075.

9. Obeid F, Fath J, Guslits B et al. Increases in intraabdominal pressure a. ect pulmonary compliance. Arch Surg 1995; 130, 544–548.
10. Holzheimer RG, Gathof B. Re-operation for complicated secondary peritonitis - how to identify patients at risk for persistent sepsis. Eur J Med Res. 2003; Mar 27;8(3):125-34.
11. Marvaso A. Surgical strategies in severe abdominal Infez Med. 1998;6(3):129-138.
12. Koperna T, Schulz F Relaparotomy in peritonitis: prognosis and treatment of patients with persisting intraabdominal infection. World J Surg 2000;24:32–37
13. Schein M Planned relaparotomies and open management in critical intra-abdominal infections: prospective experience in 52 cases. World J Surg 1991;15:537–545
14. Teichmann W, Wittmann DH, Androne A Scheduled relaparotomies (etappenlavage) for di.use peritonitis. Arch Surg 1986; 121:147– 152
15. Walsh GL, Chiasson P, Hedderich G, Wexler MJ, Meakins JL The open abdomen. Surg Clin North Am1998; 68:25–40
16. Amid PK Classi.cation of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1997; 1:15–21
17. Doyon A, Devroede G, Viens D, Saito S, Rioux A, Echave´ V, Sauve´ M, Martin M, Poisson J A simple, inexpensive, life-saving way to perform iterative laparotomy in patients with severe intra-abdominal sepsis. Colorectal Dis 2001;3:115–121
18. Mayberry JC, Mullins RJ, Crass RA, Trunkey MD Prevention of abdominal compartment syndrome by absorbable mesh prosthesis closure. Arch Surg 1997;132:957– 962