Factors Affecting on the Prognosis in Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms
Abstract
Background: With improvements in diagnostic methods, the incidence of multiple intracranial aneurysms has increased up to 35%. Factors influential on outcome in multiple intracranial aneurysms are still debatable. We aimed to determine risk factors related to multiple intracranial aneurysms in patients admitted with subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by a ruptured intracranial aneurysm.
Material and Methods: This retrospective study was performed on 105 aneurysms of 48 patients diagnosed with multiple aneurysms using charts, records, and film archives among 250 patients admitted to İstanbul Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital between January 2003-December 2009 who were examined and treated for subarachnoid hemorrhage. Age, gender, medical history, admission/surgery times, clinical features determined on neurological examination at admission (WFNS Score), amount of blood measured on cranial computed tomographic images (Fisher Score), number of aneurysms and systems to which they belonged, complications, and Glasgow outcome scale indicating the morbidity and mortality were recorded.
Results: The mean age was 52.75±14.02(4-90) years. The female/male ratio was 2.2. Most common clinical features were headache (83.7%), and hypertension (56.3%). The most common location was the middle cerebral artery, and aneurysm size was 2-6 mm (66.7%). The most common intervention was an early clipping of as many aneurysms as possible in one session (84.7%). Vasospasm and hydrocephalus were the most common complications (31.1%, 16.6%, respectively). No difference was present between early and late interventions regarding mortality. Glasgow outcome Scale was negatively correlated with Fisher score (r=-0.306), but not with WFNS score.
Conclusions: Age, amount of cisternal blood preoperatively, and postoperative vasospasm are risk factors for mortality, but not hypertension and postoperative hydrocephalus. WFNS Scoring system is not a reliable mortality predictor.
Key Words: Multiple intracranial aneurysms, Fisher score, Glasgow outcome scale, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, WFNS Score
Keywords
References
- 1. Ellamushi HE, Grieve JP, Jager HR, Kitchen ND. Risk factors for the formation of multiple intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2001;94(5):728-32.
- 2. Rinne J, Hernesniemi J, Puranen M, Saari T. Multiple intracranial aneurysms in a defined population: prospective angiographic and clinical study. Neurosurgery. 1994;35(5):803-8.
- 3. Jabbarli R, Dinger TF, Darkwah Oppong M, Pierscianek D, Dammann P, Wrede KH, et al. Risk Factors for and Clinical Consequences of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2018;49(4):848-55.
- 4. Kassell NF, Torner JC, Jane JA, Haley EC, Jr., Adams HP. The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery. Part 2: Surgical results. J Neurosurg. 1990;73(1):37-47.
- 5. Mizoi K, Suzuki J, Yoshimoto T. Surgical treatment of multiple aneurysms. Review of experience with 372 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1989;96(1-2):8-14.
- 6. Rinne J, Hernesniemi J, Niskanen M, Vapalahti M. Management outcome for multiple intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1995;36(1):31-7; discussion 7-8.
- 7. Yaşargil MG. Multiple Aneurysms. In: Yaşargil MG, editor. Microneurosurgery: II Clinical Considerations, Surgery of the intracranial aneurysms and results. 2. Stuttgart: George Thieme Verlag; 1984. p. 305-28.
- 8. Yaşargil MG. Pathological Considerations. In: Yaşargil MG, editor. Microneurosurgery: I Microsurgical Anatomy of the Basal Cisterns and Vessels of the Brain; Diagnostic Studies, General Operative Techniques and Pathological Considerations of the Intracranial Aneurysms. 1. Stuttgart: George Thieme Verlag; 1984. p. 279-349.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Clinical Sciences
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
December 25, 2020
Submission Date
October 6, 2020
Acceptance Date
December 18, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2020 Volume: 17 Number: 3