Bıldırcın Rasyonlarına Polen İlavesinin Besi Performansı ve Karkas Parametreleri Üzerine Etkisi

Abstract

Bu çalışma, bıldırcın (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica) rasyonlarına farklı oranlarda arı poleni ilavesinin canlı ağırlık, canlı ağırlık artışı, yem tüketimi, yemden yararlanma oranı ve bazı karkas parametreleri üzerine etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı. Araştırmada bir günlük yaşta toplam 300 adet bıldırcın civcivi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma grupları, her biri 100 civcivden oluşan 3 ana gruba ve bu ana grupların her biri 25 civcivden oluşan 4 alt gruba ayrılmıştır. Bıldırcınlar için hazırlanan rasyonlarda, kontrol grubunda herhangi bir yem katkı maddesi kullanılmazken, diğer grupların yemlerine % 0.25 (P1) ve 0.50 (P2) arı poleni ilave edilmiştir. Araştırma 42 gün sürmüştür. Deneme genelinde (1-42. günler) canlı ağırlık, canlı ağırlık artışı, yem tüketimi ve yemden yararlanma oranları bakımından gruplar arasında istatistiksel farklılık belirlenmemiştir (P>0.05). Karkas parametrelerinden sıcak ve soğuk karkas ağırlıkları, kalp, karaciğer, taşlık, bağırsak, göğüs, but, kanat, sırt+boyun ve diğer ağırlıkları ve bağırsak uzunluğu bakımından gruplar arasında istatistiksel farklılık belirlenmemiştir. Abdominal yağ ağırlığı ve oranı bakımından P2 grubu kontrol grubuna göre düşük olduğu tespit edilmiştir (P<0.05). Sıcak ve soğuk karkas oranları P1 ve P2 gruplarında kontrol grubundan yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir (P<0.001). Sonuç olarak, bıldırcın rasyonlarına % 0.25 ve 0.50 düzeylerinde arı poleni ilavesinin; 42 günlük araştırma süresince besi performansı üzerinde kontrol grubuna benzer sonuçlar oluşturması, sıcak ve soğuk karkas oranlarını iyileştirmesi ve abdominal yağ oranında azalmaya neden olmasından dolayı yem katkı maddesi olarak kullanılmasının yararlı olacağı kanaatine varılmıştır. 

Keywords

• Besi performansı,Bıldırcın,Karkas ağırlığı,Arı poleni

Effects of Dietary Addition of Pollen on Growth Performance and Carcass Traits of Japanese Quail

Abstract

This study was conducted for the purpose of determining the effects of adding bee pollens at different rates to quail (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica) rations on live weight, live weight gain, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio, and some carcass parameters. A total of 300 daily quail chicks were used in the study. The study groups were divided into 3 main groups each of which consisting of 100 chicks; and these main groups were divided into 4 sub-groups each of which consisting of 25 chicks. There were no additives in the ration that was prepared for the control group quails; and bee pollen was added to the rations of the other groups as 0.25% (P1) and 0.50% (P2). The study lasted 42 days. During the course of the study (1^st-42^nd days) no statistically significant differences were determined among the groups in terms of live weight, live weight gain, feed consumption, and feed conversion ratio (P>0.05). No statistically significant differences were determined among the groups in terms of hot and cold carcass weights, and the weights of heart, liver, gizzards intestines, chest, thighs, back-neck and other organs, and in terms of the length of the intestines, which are among the carcass parameters. In terms of abdominal fat weight and rate, the P2 group was determined to have lower values when compared with the control group (P<0.05). It was determined that hot and cold carcass rates in P1 and P2 groups were higher than those of the control group (P<0.001). As a conclusion, it was concluded that adding bee pollen to quail rations at rates of 0.25% and 0.50% gave similar results with the control group in terms of feeding performance along the 42-day study period. It was also concluded that it would be useful to use bee pollen as an additive to the rations since it improved hot and cold carcass rates; and caused that abdominal fat rates were reduced.

Keywords

• Fattening performance,Quail,Carcass,Bee pollen

References

1. Almaraz-Abarca N, Campos MDG, Avila-Reyes JA, Naranjo-Jim´enez N, Herrera-Corral J, Gonz´alez-Valdez LS, 2004: Variability of antioxidant activity among honeybee-collected pollen of different botanical origin. Interciencia, 29, 574-578.
2. Almeida-Muradian LB, Pamplona LC, Coimbra S, Barth OM, 2005: Chemical composition and botanical evaluation of dried bee pollen pellets. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 18, 105-111.
3. Asafova N, Orlov B, Kozin R, 2001: Physiologically Active Bee Products. edited by: Y. A. Nikolaev. Russia,
4. Attia YA, Al-Hamid AA, Ibrahim MS, Al-Harthi MA, Bovera F, Elnaggar AS, 2014: Productive performance, biochemical and hematological traits of broiler chickens supplemented with propolis, bee pollen, and mannan oligosaccharides continuously or intermittently. Livestock Science, 164, 87-95.
5. Attia YA, Al-Hanoun A, Tag El-Din AE., Bovera F, Shewika Y, 2011: Effect of bee polen levels on productive, reproductive and blood traits of NZW rabbits. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr, 95, 294-303.
6. Babaei S, Rahimi S, Torshizi MAK, Tahmasebi G, Miran SNK, 2016: Effects of propolis, royal jelly, honey and bee pollen on growth performance and immune system of Japanese quails. In Veterinary Research Forum, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. 7, 13-20.
7. Bolacali M, Irak K, 2017: Effect of dietary yeast autolysate on performance, slaughter, and carcass characteristics, as well as blood parameters, in quail of both genders. South African Journal of Animal Science, 47, 460-470.
8. Campos MG, Bogdanov S, De Almeida-Muradian LB, Szczesna T, Mancebo Y, Frigerio C, Ferreira F, 2008: Pollen composition and standardisation of analytical methods. Journal of Apicultural Research, 47, 154-161.

9. Canogullari S, Baylan, M, Sahinler N, Sahin A, 2009: Effects of propolis and polen supplementations on growth performance and body components of Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Arch. Geflugelk, 73, 173-178.
10. Doğan N, Hayoğlu İ, 2012: Propolis ve kullanım alanları. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 16, 39-48.
11. Eraslan G, Kanbur M, Silici S, Liman BC, Altınordulu Ş, Sarıca ZS, 2009: Evaluation of protective effect of bee polen against propoxur toxicity in rat. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 72, 931-937.
12. Ergün A, Çolpan İ, Yıldız G, Küçükersan S, Tuncer Ş D, Yalçın S, Küçükersan MK, Şehu A, 2014: Hayvan besleme ve beslenme hastalıkları. Pozitif Matbaacılık, Ankara, s:47.
13. Farag Soha A, El-Rayes TK, 2016: Effect of Bee-pollen Supplementation on Performance, Carcass Traits and Blood Parameters of Broiler Chickens. Asian Journal of Animaland Veterinary Advances, 11, 168-177.
14. Genchev A, Mihaylov R, 2008: Slaughter analysis protocol in experiments using Japanese quails (Coturnix Japonica). Trakia J. Sci. 6, 66-71.
15. Griggs JP, Jacob JP, 2005: Alternatives to antibiotics for organic poultry production. J, Appl, Poult, Res, 14 750-756.
16. Hascik P, Trembecká L, Bobko M, Kačániová M, Bučko O, Tkáčová J, Kunová S, 2015: Effect of different feed supplements on selected quality indicators of chicken meat. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 9, 427-434.
17. Hascik P, Trembecká L, Bobko M, Kačániová M, Čuboň J, Kunová S, Bučko O, 2016: Effect of diet supplemented with propolis extract and probiotic additives on performance, carcass characteristic sand meat composition of broiler chickens. Potravinarstvo, 10, 223-231.
18. Hašèík P, Elimam I, Garlík J, Kacániová M, Cuboò J, Bobko M, Abdulla H, 2012: Impact of bee pollen as feed supplements on the body weight of broiler Ross 308. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11, 15596-15599.
19. Hosseini SM., Azghandi MV, Ahani S, Nourmohammadi R, 2016. Effect of bee pollen and propolis (bee glue) on growth performance and biomarkers of heat stress in broiler chickens reared under high ambient temperature. J Anim Feed Sci, 25, 45-51.
20. Kleczek K, Wilkiewicz-Wawro E, Wawro K, Makowski W, Murawsk D, Wawro M, 2014: The effect of dietary propolis supplementation on the growth performance of broiler chickens. Pol J Natur Sc, 29, 105-117.
21. Komosinska-Vassev, K, Olczyk P, Kaźmierczak J, Mencner L, Olczyk K, 2015: Bee pollen: chemical composition and therapeutic application. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (Erişim Tarihi:21.11.2017) (http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/297425).
22. Kroyer G, Hegedus N, 2001: Evaluation of bioactive properties of pollen extracts as functional dietary food supplement. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 2, 171-174.
23. NRC. (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
24. Oliveira MC, Da Silva DM, Loch FC, Martins PC, Dias DMB, Simon GA, 2013: Effect of bee pollen on the immunity and tibia characteristics in broilers. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 15, 323-327.
25. Pascoal A, Rodrigues S, Teixeira A, Feás X, Estevinho LM, 2014: Biological activities of commercial bee pollens: Antimicrobial, antimutagenic, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 63, 233-239.
26. Popova M, Silici S, Kaftanoglu O, Bankova V, 2005: Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and ıts qualitative and quantitative chemical composition, Phytomedicine, 12, 221-228.
27. Roulston TH, Cane JH, 2000. Pollen nutritional content and digestibility for animals. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 222, 187-209.
28. Seven İ, Seven PT, Aslan AS, Yıldız N, 2013. Farklı yerleşim sıklığında yetiştirilen Japon bıldırcınlarının (Coturnix coturnix japonica) performans parametreleri üzerine rasyona katılan multi enzimin etkileri. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi, 27, 155-158.
29. SPSS 2015: SPSS Base 23.0 for Windows User’s Guide, Chicago, Illinois
30. Szczesna T, 2006: Long chain fatty acids composition of honeybeecollected pollen. Journal of Apicultural Science, 50, 65-79.
31. Tuncer Hİ, 2007: Karma yemlerde kullanımı yasaklanan hormon, antibiyotik, antikoksidiyal ve ilaçlar. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 47, 29-37.
32. Zeweil HS, Abd El-Rahman MHA, Dosoky WM, Abu Hafsa SH, Abdulhamid ABA, 2016: Effects of gınger and bee propolıs on the performance, carcass characterıstıcs and blood constıtuents of growıng japanese quaıl. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal, 36, 143-159.